Un jeune homme masqué cherche à se venger après la destruction de la maison de ses grands-parents.Un jeune homme masqué cherche à se venger après la destruction de la maison de ses grands-parents.Un jeune homme masqué cherche à se venger après la destruction de la maison de ses grands-parents.
- Récompenses
- 4 nominations au total
Lawrence Oliver Cherry
- News Anchor - Dodley
- (voix)
- (générique uniquement)
Kevin Alexis Rivera
- Store Employee
- (as a different name)
Avis à la une
Good acting with a dark, brooding, bizarre protagonist. Kept my interest but slow going at times. Some will say this is a story about nothing. For me it felt like a 21st century Dickensian social commentary about the haves and have nots. Would have rated higher if not for lackluster ending.
I definitely see why *some* reviewers were turned off or annoyed by this film's slow pacing and lack of an in-your-face plot. The plot is there, but it's definitely not something like a John Wick or Joker where you feel as though every moment of the film is building on it and toward a specific outcome.
The story centers on two disaffected youths from different social backgrounds but who both live in and appreciate Brooklyn and NYC. I haven't seen New York presented as well as in this film in a long time, with long quiet (save for some background music in parts) scenes that capture the city as almost a character.
The dialog is slow and disjointed at times, but that's part of the deal when your protagonists are both somewhat introverted and still feeling out where they fit in their own skin and society at large.
The villain was a little over the top, and the strange (non) sex scene in which nothing actually happens but three semi-nude women writhing around all over each other in front of him was IMO totally unnecessary and, while filmed rather competently, amateurly conceived and included in the first place. That was good for a 2 star reduction right there.
The score was awesome and original. I loved most of the background music.
Look, this is the very definition of "art house" cinema. It reminded me of Uncut Gems but without the frenetic pacing, super uncomfortable situations and borderline psycho characters, not to mention the clear plot.
I give this one 6.8 stars rounded up to 7 as it was mostly a very engaging watch and sucked me in despite the no-frills production and sparse plot development (which, again, was intentional - leaving the viewer to read between the lines). If you're turned off by the negative reviews, then this one probably isn't for you and you can safely skip it. If you're in the mood for something different, relaxing even, give it a try.
The story centers on two disaffected youths from different social backgrounds but who both live in and appreciate Brooklyn and NYC. I haven't seen New York presented as well as in this film in a long time, with long quiet (save for some background music in parts) scenes that capture the city as almost a character.
The dialog is slow and disjointed at times, but that's part of the deal when your protagonists are both somewhat introverted and still feeling out where they fit in their own skin and society at large.
The villain was a little over the top, and the strange (non) sex scene in which nothing actually happens but three semi-nude women writhing around all over each other in front of him was IMO totally unnecessary and, while filmed rather competently, amateurly conceived and included in the first place. That was good for a 2 star reduction right there.
The score was awesome and original. I loved most of the background music.
Look, this is the very definition of "art house" cinema. It reminded me of Uncut Gems but without the frenetic pacing, super uncomfortable situations and borderline psycho characters, not to mention the clear plot.
I give this one 6.8 stars rounded up to 7 as it was mostly a very engaging watch and sucked me in despite the no-frills production and sparse plot development (which, again, was intentional - leaving the viewer to read between the lines). If you're turned off by the negative reviews, then this one probably isn't for you and you can safely skip it. If you're in the mood for something different, relaxing even, give it a try.
This movie had it's moments, but in the end, I was left with nothing. This film was pretty much pointless. Or if there was a point, it went right over my head. Cosmo Jarvis was great in this, but the movie itself goes nowhere. It felt like they were building up to something great but nothing happens. It had some good cinematography and acting but no concrete plot. Not a film I'd recommend. 5 stars.
The entire movie is built around seemingly interesting characters with very abstract personalities. The movie seemed really promising but the plot was not revealed for 70 mins of the film.
The actors were not clear about their personalities and often lost the character they were playing.
Would not recommend
The actors were not clear about their personalities and often lost the character they were playing.
Would not recommend
Honestly, I spent a great deal of this movie wondering what happened to the beautiful, sexy whiskey voice Cosmo had on "Shogun"; about the same amount of time I spent waiting for the plot to show up. The balance of the run-time (and a short time thereafter) included a failed search for the end of the film; not that there was much of a plot from the beginning.
After the incredible success of "Shogun", and Cosmo's performance in it, I was soooo looking forward to watching this movie to see more of his work. I started an attempt to excuse the sub-par performance on youth and inexperience; unfortunately this film is only dated 4 years ago.
Well, sadly, something went very wrong here. Even sadder, the story/plot didn't even show up for work.
Can't wait to see you again... in a GOOD movie, Cosmo. I believe in you.
One last thing, the beautiful young woman in the hijab, (I think her name is Dela Meskienyar) she had a number of really great moments and clearly has talent. Keep up the good work. 😁👍
After the incredible success of "Shogun", and Cosmo's performance in it, I was soooo looking forward to watching this movie to see more of his work. I started an attempt to excuse the sub-par performance on youth and inexperience; unfortunately this film is only dated 4 years ago.
Well, sadly, something went very wrong here. Even sadder, the story/plot didn't even show up for work.
Can't wait to see you again... in a GOOD movie, Cosmo. I believe in you.
One last thing, the beautiful young woman in the hijab, (I think her name is Dela Meskienyar) she had a number of really great moments and clearly has talent. Keep up the good work. 😁👍
Le saviez-vous
- Bandes originalesGive Me Life (Colors Verison)
Written by Simon Andersson (uncredited), Simon Lauridsen (uncredited), and Fine Jensen (uncredited)
Performed by Chinah
Courtesy of N03 / Colors Media UG
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Funny Face?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 18 489 $US
- Durée1 heure 35 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant