NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
558
MA NOTE
Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Tanya Christiansen
- Catherine
- (as Tanya Christensen)
Morgan Christiansen
- Festival Attendee
- (non crédité)
Sheri Lahris
- Restaurant Patron
- (non crédité)
Luis Reyres
- Archaeology Student
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
One of so many romances suported by impressive locations and a presumed erudition. Nothing original or realistic or romantic. But good ocasion to use a fairy tale theme in superficial manner. And this is, in good measure, what real matters.
Not so bad acting ( sure, with some indulgence), not awful story ( the dose of indulgence becomes more serious ) . The air of presumed air of treasure hunter, the legends and the diaries, books are good tools for reasonable chain of adventures and illusion of romance. The good point - the comunity spirit.
In short, a poor film with some presumed sparkles. And this is all.
Not so bad acting ( sure, with some indulgence), not awful story ( the dose of indulgence becomes more serious ) . The air of presumed air of treasure hunter, the legends and the diaries, books are good tools for reasonable chain of adventures and illusion of romance. The good point - the comunity spirit.
In short, a poor film with some presumed sparkles. And this is all.
The lead actors are some of the most annoying I've seen & the storyline is similar to Pearl in Paradise which has far more credible actors/acting. The only redeeming feature of this film is the stunning location.
It was cute, but so incredibly unrealistic.
Those damn heeled boots she wore to go hiking in?!! I mean, what the hell!? ANY experienced hiker (and archaeologist) would know never to use that kind of footwear! And when they were digging in the sand, with a pickaxe!? Honestly, those might have been little things, but I found them so annoying to the point of hilarity.
I managed to make it to the end, which is something. A one-time watch if you can make it through.
Those damn heeled boots she wore to go hiking in?!! I mean, what the hell!? ANY experienced hiker (and archaeologist) would know never to use that kind of footwear! And when they were digging in the sand, with a pickaxe!? Honestly, those might have been little things, but I found them so annoying to the point of hilarity.
I managed to make it to the end, which is something. A one-time watch if you can make it through.
Must find a lovers stone or the museum closes; how lame. Girl meets bed n breakfast employee, very predictable. He is with island festival committee, who must save the festival. The myth of the lovers stone will bring in tourists. Extras in the movie make up for bad tourists. Girl gets lost in jungle...and is rescued. Senario--girl helps boy with festival, boy helps girl find stone and the same old ending as all other "hallmark" type movie But the dialog is just bad.
Legend based on myth or truth? Of course. Maddie thinks it's true. At least she hopes it's true. The future of her museum depends on it.
Meanwhile, Fitz needs something to save tourism for the island he loves.
Thus starts the search for the lover's stone. And that's the story. It's not surprising they had to throw in Fitz's girlfriend to liven things up. It didn't help. I never saw anyone so unenthusiastic about proposing to his girlfriend and that was before he really got to know Maddie.
I was not familiar with Katrina Norman. I didn't recognize Tilky Jones but I had seen him in a couple of forgettable roles. The two had some mild chemistry. Like the story, nothing very exciting and no surprises.
The ending is more cheesy than sappy. I like sappy, but this was too over the top for me.
Meanwhile, Fitz needs something to save tourism for the island he loves.
Thus starts the search for the lover's stone. And that's the story. It's not surprising they had to throw in Fitz's girlfriend to liven things up. It didn't help. I never saw anyone so unenthusiastic about proposing to his girlfriend and that was before he really got to know Maddie.
I was not familiar with Katrina Norman. I didn't recognize Tilky Jones but I had seen him in a couple of forgettable roles. The two had some mild chemistry. Like the story, nothing very exciting and no surprises.
The ending is more cheesy than sappy. I like sappy, but this was too over the top for me.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe name of the island Cordecil is a misspelling or a corruption of the phrase in French "Coeur du Ciel" which translates as Heart of Heaven.
- GaffesIn the very first scene when Maddie is looking at the art pieces, there is a radical change in her voice when she says a sentence turning to the woman who asks how she can tell they are fakes. She explains "The signature..." in her first recorded voice, but then continues the sentence "is in Arabic, not hieroglyphs" in a deeper, louder voice clearly overdubbed and poorly edited.
- Citations
Andrew Fitzpatrick: So we're currently driving on the first modern road on the island, Highway 1.
Maddie Turner: Is there a Highway 2?
Andrew Fitzpatrick: No.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant