NOTE IMDb
3,5/10
14 k
MA NOTE
John Wood laisse derrière lui les morceaux d'une civilisation brisée pour revenir à ses racines dans les bois, après qu'une pandémie de virus a frappé le monde.John Wood laisse derrière lui les morceaux d'une civilisation brisée pour revenir à ses racines dans les bois, après qu'une pandémie de virus a frappé le monde.John Wood laisse derrière lui les morceaux d'une civilisation brisée pour revenir à ses racines dans les bois, après qu'une pandémie de virus a frappé le monde.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Kamil Lemie
- Jorge
- (as Kamil Lemieszewski)
Avis à la une
What an absolute sham of a movie. The fact this is rated above a 5 baffles me. It was atrocious acting, bad violence, and full of more cheesy one liners than an actual script. It looked like I filmed it on my iPhone at time. Just plain pathetic.
Honestly, you have to ask yourself how and why this was made. It's awful on every front. There are no real actors, the script is just terrible. One person wrote in another review "just because you can produce and star in a movie doesn't mean you should." That describes this.
It's supposed to be some end of world type situation where he's living in the woods and a lady comes across his path. The dialog is pretty awful and with their lack of acting skills, it's very hard to get through. You will have to fast forward to get through this mess. Then some bad guys come and there's some terrible fight scenes, they had to be making this up as they went along.
The main guy, who's name is above the title on the poster, it dreadfully awful. The name above the title on the poster is done with big name actors to get people to want to see the movie. There's no one who saw this poster and said "wow, I've got to see that!"
The guy has zero acting skills. He is buffed, clearly spending way more time on his body than his acting. But if you look at his credits, it's all "shorts" (which means it's just him and his buddies making short "films" on his camera) and "uncredited" which is an extra (which literally anyone can do). He has hardlyl any real credits. So why the name above the title? I guess to impress his mom because that's the only person who'd be impressed.
Rarely do I give a one star for something but this one deserves it. Any of the "ten star" reviews you see that rave about this were from people who worked on it. Notice how many other 'reviews' they have.
AVOID.
It's supposed to be some end of world type situation where he's living in the woods and a lady comes across his path. The dialog is pretty awful and with their lack of acting skills, it's very hard to get through. You will have to fast forward to get through this mess. Then some bad guys come and there's some terrible fight scenes, they had to be making this up as they went along.
The main guy, who's name is above the title on the poster, it dreadfully awful. The name above the title on the poster is done with big name actors to get people to want to see the movie. There's no one who saw this poster and said "wow, I've got to see that!"
The guy has zero acting skills. He is buffed, clearly spending way more time on his body than his acting. But if you look at his credits, it's all "shorts" (which means it's just him and his buddies making short "films" on his camera) and "uncredited" which is an extra (which literally anyone can do). He has hardlyl any real credits. So why the name above the title? I guess to impress his mom because that's the only person who'd be impressed.
Rarely do I give a one star for something but this one deserves it. Any of the "ten star" reviews you see that rave about this were from people who worked on it. Notice how many other 'reviews' they have.
AVOID.
Ok, this can be worth having on the TV if you are doing something else, but don't make popcorn to watch this movie like I did, because you will simply be bummed out you ate a bunch of popcorn for nothing. Just go watch an 80's action flick, you will be more entertained.
"No one sets out to make a bad movie." But they all had to know this one is. Some of the worst acting, directing, and writing you'll ever skim through. I only gave it a 3 out of charity. But they got paid; The viewer gets nothing for wasted time. However, I kind of liked the ending after all that muscle and posturing.
This movie is so bad even the nudity is rubbish!!!!
Suck the personality, characters and story out of a movie and what you have left is Last Man Down.
Arnie would not want this guy to 'Get to the chopper'!
Suck the personality, characters and story out of a movie and what you have left is Last Man Down.
Arnie would not want this guy to 'Get to the chopper'!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLocations in and around military museums were used as sets for large parts of the movie. A naval museum and an aviation museum.
- GaffesWhen John extracts the bullet, there is a tracker on it, but there is no way that bullet would go down a barrel with any accuracy.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Last Man Down?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant