Twisters
- 2024
- Tous publics
- 2h 2min
Une actualisation du film "Twister" de 1996, qui mettait en scène deux chasseurs de tempêtes risquant leur vie pour tester un système expérimental d'alerte météorologique.Une actualisation du film "Twister" de 1996, qui mettait en scène deux chasseurs de tempêtes risquant leur vie pour tester un système expérimental d'alerte météorologique.Une actualisation du film "Twister" de 1996, qui mettait en scène deux chasseurs de tempêtes risquant leur vie pour tester un système expérimental d'alerte météorologique.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 36 nominations au total
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Twisters' is a mixed bag, drawing comparisons to the original 'Twister'. Praise is given for its visual effects, Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones' performances, and updated technology. However, criticisms include lack of originality, shallow plot, and underdeveloped characters. Action sequences and special effects are well-received, but the film's pacing and lead chemistry receive varied feedback. Despite its flaws, 'Twisters' is considered an entertaining, though not entirely satisfying, experience.
Avis à la une
Twister is an almost three decades older movie yet it has unquestionably superior cinematography, editing, sound editing, surround sound mixing, score and soundtrack. It also has much more creative and visually memorable tornado sequences.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
I want to keep this brief because there really isn't so much to say about this film. The plot is beat to death, with the emotional and plot pivot beats being as predictable as a marvel movie. The film doesn't take itself all that seriously, which is certainly an upside considering how mediocre it is. Every now and then the humor is pretty good and Glen Powell's performance easily is the best out of the two leads. One huge shining mark for the film are the gorgeous wide shot visuals and awesome destruction and effects of the tornados. They did a great job of capturing the beauty of the American midwest.
Beisdes these things, it is an entirely predictable and forgettable film about finishing the job after a haunting tragedy. Despite how average it was, I still enjoyed the film, at least enough for a random Wednesday.
Beisdes these things, it is an entirely predictable and forgettable film about finishing the job after a haunting tragedy. Despite how average it was, I still enjoyed the film, at least enough for a random Wednesday.
Twisters is odd because it's not really a sequel to the original Twister (1996), nor is it a remake. It's its own thing. And that's kind of a good thing. This film is highly predictable, which takes away a lot of the suspense, but it still manages to present a few exciting moments. Also, I expected the visual effects to far surpass the ones from the 90s, but they honestly seem about the same. And there are far too many characters for me to care about any of them individually, except for Glen Powell, who is a whirlwind of charisma. Even with all its eye-rolling moments, I enjoyed watching Twisters.
Nowhere near as good as the original. Why did they feel the need to remake this? Why can't studios come up with their own new ideas instead of remaking past great movies? What has happened to Hollywood? Where has creativity gone to? It's like they fired or all the best creators quit in Hollywood. I just don't get it. Why are so many movies so horrible today? It's so sad what's been going on lately.
I would highly recommend just watching the original again instead of this mess. The visuals are OK (sometimes), but the original's effects were really good as well, and that was decades ago. The acting and story was subpar at best.
2 out of 10 - save yourself some money and watch the original instead.
I would highly recommend just watching the original again instead of this mess. The visuals are OK (sometimes), but the original's effects were really good as well, and that was decades ago. The acting and story was subpar at best.
2 out of 10 - save yourself some money and watch the original instead.
Twister is an absolute travesty, a cinematic disaster that not even its colossal budget could save. It's painfully clear that this film was cobbled together with the sole intention of squeezing every last dime out of impressionable teenagers, capitalizing on the nostalgia of the original classic. The sheer audacity of the filmmakers to slap a big, famous headline on this monstrosity is infuriating.
This movie has effectively tarnished the legacy of the original "Twister," dragging it through the mud with a lifeless plot, atrocious dialogue, and special effects that somehow look worse than what we saw in the 90s. They even had the nerve to cast actresses who are so dangerously underweight that they look like ten-year-old boys-it's not just unconvincing, it's downright disturbing.
They must think we're fools, but anyone with a shred of taste will see right through this cash-grab abomination. Avoid this movie like the plague; it's a gross insult to cinema and to anyone who loved the original.
This movie has effectively tarnished the legacy of the original "Twister," dragging it through the mud with a lifeless plot, atrocious dialogue, and special effects that somehow look worse than what we saw in the 90s. They even had the nerve to cast actresses who are so dangerously underweight that they look like ten-year-old boys-it's not just unconvincing, it's downright disturbing.
They must think we're fools, but anyone with a shred of taste will see right through this cash-grab abomination. Avoid this movie like the plague; it's a gross insult to cinema and to anyone who loved the original.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJames Paxton: The son of Bill Paxton, appears during the rodeo scene as the angry hotel guest.
- GaffesIn the movie, tornadoes kept popping up and catching crowds unaware.
In Oklahoma TV stations compete aggressively to offer the best severe weather coverage. When conditions are right for potential severe each station would have at least three - if not more - teams of trained spotters deployed, a helicopter for each station, and multiple forms of advanced radar to track storms.
While there are a number of amateur, academic and even weather-tourism spotters around, the majority of spotters would be affiliated with television stations, and citizens know to be following weather reports, resulting in significant advanced notice of approaching storms.
- Crédits fousThe Warner Bros and Amblin Entertainment logos have stormclouds in the background.
- Bandes originalesSalio el sol
Written by Paul Irizarry, William Rivera, and Armando Rosario
Performed by Don Omar
Courtesy of Machete Music / VI Music
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Twisters?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 155 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 267 762 265 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 81 251 415 $US
- 21 juil. 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 372 262 265 $US
- Durée
- 2h 2min(122 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant