Nail bomber: Le terroriste qui a fait trembler Londres
Titre original : The Nailbomber
NOTE IMDb
6,3/10
2,6 k
MA NOTE
Ce documentaire raconte l'histoire des attentats de Londres de 1999 qui ont visé les communautés minoritaires, et la course contre la montre pour retrouver le responsable, un terroriste d'ex... Tout lireCe documentaire raconte l'histoire des attentats de Londres de 1999 qui ont visé les communautés minoritaires, et la course contre la montre pour retrouver le responsable, un terroriste d'extrême droite.Ce documentaire raconte l'histoire des attentats de Londres de 1999 qui ont visé les communautés minoritaires, et la course contre la montre pour retrouver le responsable, un terroriste d'extrême droite.
- Nomination aux 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 nomination au total
David Copeland
- Self - Nail Bomber
- (images d'archives)
Tony Blair
- Self - British Prime Minister
- (images d'archives)
Paul Condon
- Self - Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police
- (images d'archives)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Dictator of Germany
- (images d'archives)
Nick Ross
- Self - Host, Crimewatch UK, BBC
- (images d'archives)
John Tyndall
- Self - British National Party Leader
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
Netflix can been quite hit or miss with It's documentaries and the stylistic presentation can quite often make or break a netflix documentary. As can how long it runs for. Be it 1 episode or 4 episodes.
The Nailbomber did a very good job at telling the story of a lone wolf bomber who let off multiple bombs in attacks that were racially motivated in London in a single solid episode.
My number one desire from a documentary is to get across as much interesting and relavent information as possible and The Nail Bomber certainly did that. I was only 9 or 10 at the time of the attacks and although I'm from the UK, I don't really recall the attacks. Also being from Northern Ireland, terrorism based around The Northern Irish troubles was far more prevalent in my mind and still is when I think back to the 90s. So it was very interesting (and saddening) to learn about other problems occurring in the same decade. The show had interesting interviews with victims and played insightful tape recordings of the perpetrator being interviewed. Unlike other Netflix documentaries (Son of sam). It doesn't mix and match the style of voice over vs interviews. Nor is the the documentary stretched out over many episodes. Someone could have tried that if they had the motivation or had been given the go ahead. Due to it being a multi bomb and court case story. Luckily they stayed with an hour and a bit single episode and it worked.
It's definitely a crime documentary to watch if this genre is your thing and it's better than other recent attempts by Netflix. A good solid 7/10. So give it a go.
The Nailbomber did a very good job at telling the story of a lone wolf bomber who let off multiple bombs in attacks that were racially motivated in London in a single solid episode.
My number one desire from a documentary is to get across as much interesting and relavent information as possible and The Nail Bomber certainly did that. I was only 9 or 10 at the time of the attacks and although I'm from the UK, I don't really recall the attacks. Also being from Northern Ireland, terrorism based around The Northern Irish troubles was far more prevalent in my mind and still is when I think back to the 90s. So it was very interesting (and saddening) to learn about other problems occurring in the same decade. The show had interesting interviews with victims and played insightful tape recordings of the perpetrator being interviewed. Unlike other Netflix documentaries (Son of sam). It doesn't mix and match the style of voice over vs interviews. Nor is the the documentary stretched out over many episodes. Someone could have tried that if they had the motivation or had been given the go ahead. Due to it being a multi bomb and court case story. Luckily they stayed with an hour and a bit single episode and it worked.
It's definitely a crime documentary to watch if this genre is your thing and it's better than other recent attempts by Netflix. A good solid 7/10. So give it a go.
There's certainly an interesting doco in here but it's very poorly produced.
None of the participants in doco are identified and producers try to be way too cute in how it's all presented.
Subject is interesting but program presentation lets it all down.
None of the participants in doco are identified and producers try to be way too cute in how it's all presented.
Subject is interesting but program presentation lets it all down.
What these people did, and their ilk, deserved nothing less than the death sentence. Despicable excuse for human beings.
But once has to ask. Why now? With tensions in the world reaching critical mass, why now choose to bring this story to the globe. Just something to think about.
But once has to ask. Why now? With tensions in the world reaching critical mass, why now choose to bring this story to the globe. Just something to think about.
Refreshing with a true crime documentary on Netflix that isn't 8-10 episodes long. This documentary was a tight 70 minutes, it's actually one of those rare instances where I wouldn't have minded if it spent a little more time on the political climate.
Britain, Germany, Norway, Sweden. The list goes on. All of them countries where the police and other authorities downplay or ignore the threat posed by far right terrorists, with death and destruction in their wake.
Britain, Germany, Norway, Sweden. The list goes on. All of them countries where the police and other authorities downplay or ignore the threat posed by far right terrorists, with death and destruction in their wake.
BOOM!
A documentary about a series of bombings in London in 1999, aiming at minority groups.
This was a boring one. There honestly wasn't really much to the story in the first play. Most parts in the documentary were seen before. There was a person who was a spy within an far-right group. He was potentially interesting, but then there wasn't much revealed from his aspect.
The biggest problems here are that the themes felt underwhelming and I didn't learn much about the event. Except for the spy guy, the other interviewees were all not interesting. Many times in this documentary I was bored and looked at phone instead. For only an hour and 12 minutes, it still felt long.
Overall, it's better to just watch some YouTube videos or go to Wiki to learn about the event. 4/10.
A documentary about a series of bombings in London in 1999, aiming at minority groups.
This was a boring one. There honestly wasn't really much to the story in the first play. Most parts in the documentary were seen before. There was a person who was a spy within an far-right group. He was potentially interesting, but then there wasn't much revealed from his aspect.
The biggest problems here are that the themes felt underwhelming and I didn't learn much about the event. Except for the spy guy, the other interviewees were all not interesting. Many times in this documentary I was bored and looked at phone instead. For only an hour and 12 minutes, it still felt long.
Overall, it's better to just watch some YouTube videos or go to Wiki to learn about the event. 4/10.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Nail Bomber: Manhunt?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 12 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Nail bomber: Le terroriste qui a fait trembler Londres (2021) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre