Buckskin

The story is somehow interesting. The script is good but the acting is terrible.

Seems to me the handful of negative reviews are from people who don't have a general understanding of independent film making. I mean, if you're comparing this to The Revenant, then stick with watching multimillion dollar movies. The guy who said the script is bad, did you read the script? The guy who said the editing is bad, are you an editor? Lol. Idk people are so basic minded. This movie is pretty good! Good job.

Watched this film tonight, the script and filming were alright but the setting was more town park than wilderness, some of the acting (not all) was amateurish and dreadful...... Maybe lack of proper funding can explain some of the faults, it is no "Bone Tomahawk" or."Revenant" and not even in the same universe of such great, modern, classic westerns as "Dances with Wolves", "Open Range", or the "Unforgiven".

It reminded me more of an episode of some tv western series from the 60's or 70's in its production values than a film.

Saying that I still watched it to the end and the end did surprise me ......

Terrible, really. The acting is atrocious in the most part, especially the boy, who reads his lines like its a school play. The plot is less than rudimentary and virtually anyone could write something better. The most laughable part are the two 'natives', one of which looks like he'd be more at home on an Aussie beach than prancing around in warpaint. Since I laughed in disbelief (rather similar to seeing 'Amy' the gorilla the first time in 'Congo') i gave this movie a very generous 2 stars.

I can't think of a single thing that made the experience worthwhile. Just give it a miss.

Really couldn't follow it! Seems the editing is all out of whack! One minute he is walking through the woods, the next it's months later and he's bloodied? Lost the plot .. didn't get to halfway.