Prototype

Dreadful and woefully bad acting all done on a budget of £5. I liked the little girls trainers and I had hoped that "one" was going to strangle Roger with his own tie and then beat the hell out of Michael.

Just to get it over and done with!

Within seconds you can tell this will suck ... boy I wasnt disappointed !!! Oh and the acting was worse than those masks lol. I thought I already watched all the horrible movies.

Oh my, where to start?

The acting: It's inexistant. It is clear and obvious NONE of the people involved in front of the camera - as you can see I refrain from calling them 'actors' - do have ANY knowledge of how to act .... or any skill to start with.

The filming: Someone mentioned an iPhone 6 being used to film this movie and I wouldn't be surprised if this was actually the case. It's so amateurish I would say I have seen better cat and food pictures on social media.

The effects: Yes, I wrote effects, because calling them 'special effects' would imply they are any special .... which they are not. Someone thought it's a great idea to stick a Laerdahl ressuscitation doll's face on a human and call that an android. Believe me, there's more android in a Samsung Galaxy than in this stinker.

The plot: Yes, there is one, which is already more than the rest. Is it any good? Difficult to say because it's difficult to make it out under the amateurish acting, filming, editing and effects.

So why two stars you might ask? Because the cover is well done and actually tricked me into starting to watch this garbage.

Isaac Asimov (the acclaimed Sci-Fi book author) wrote the 3 rules of law concerning, and for, Robot manufacturing... 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by any human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the 1st Law.

3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the 1st or 2nd Laws.

Unbeknownst to many he later added a law numbered "ZERO", before the first one and which has the highest importance: 0. A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

The film begins with a Robot 1 prototype killing a worker from the company that has invented it and is testing them and, we NEVER find out why it has broken the Robot primary directive law of no harm to humans. It progresses like this with never telling the viewer anything about anything!

Nothing to enjoy in this film offering of Robot's 1 and 2 who, are opposing home help family robots. 1 is a prototype model - which is very obvious - and 2 is the new superior improved model. For some reason 2 has become sentient (with the same technical flawed reasoning that the Sky-Net) Terminators had. But, as it is an extremely low, VERY LOW, budget and possibly filmed with an i-Phone, there is no plot development or story arc given to viewers at all. What we do get as viewers however is, a VERY badly acted, dull rendition of an idea that has been done on better scales before!

This is the second film this year that I have had to use my Jedi knowledge of controlling the "Force" (to impose a top level of patience and complete concentration) to in order to wade through an unbelievable heap of junk from the Dark Side!

With visuals that are worse than a moshed together Halloween costume, it had nothing that could ease my displeasure through a single grin etc to break the humdrum routine. A grimace is all I could pull from my inner muscle storage of face expressions.

The only thing good I can say about this film is that its Poster is very nice (as a ex graphic designer and as an artist I notice those things first...usually) though, It is also to blame for my ending up watching this dreary techno trash!

Not only is this a horrible movie, the ONLY positive review here on IMDB was this one:

"Very Thought Provoking, A Gem.

Petermundy-898528 April 2022 Very interesting film with insight and imagination. If a film makes you think, that's got to be a good thing. Very impressed. I was particularly taken by the fine directing and good writing. Also the actors should be complimented. The costumes were very convincing."

Ummm... That review was written by "Peter Mundy" John Peter Mundy was the "DIRECTOR" of this atrocity of a "film. FAKE REVIEW meant to try to boost his score on IMDB.

This "film" has the worst "costumes, the worst writing, the worst "acting," the worst "filming (iPhone 6??) and the worst "Director" ever! Don't waste your time on this!