Victor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dan... Tout lireVictor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dans la tragédie.Victor Frankenstein, savant ambitieux, donne vie à une créature lors d'une expérience interdite. Dans la vision gothique de Guillermo del Toro, le destin du créateur et du monstre sombre dans la tragédie.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 5 victoires et 18 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Biggest disappointment of 2025
I've loved Guillermo Del Toro since I was a teenager and I watched Pan's Labyrinth for the first time, and then I made it my goal to see everything he's ever directed. But I've loved Mary Shelley's Frankenstein since I was in elementary school. After I read it the first time, I kept rereading it over and over again.
My issue with this is that this is not Frankenstein. At least, not Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The story is completely changed, and I'm not sure that it is for the better. I was seeing all these reviewers rage how this is the Frankenstein we deserve and that this is as close as it gets to the actual book. The former is up for debate, but the latter is a straight up lie from someone who's obviously never read or understood the source material.
If this would've been an original story, I would've liked it way more. But seeing as it is supposed to be an adaptation of a childhood favorite of mine, it simply doesn't hold up. Definitely the biggest disappointment of the year for me, and I've been looking forward to this since last year. I was disappointed when I heard that it wasn't playing in theaters near me, but I guess it was for the best.
If you're going to watch this, I would suggest you drop all expectations of it being Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and watch it as it's own original thing.
"...feelings unsatisfied, yet unquenched."
Del Toro doesn't fail, but I think he misses the mark at those moments where he changes the story, revising the characters' awareness and motivations. Walz's Harlander is invented and unnecessary, Isaac's Frankenstein is frenzied rather than haunted. It is Jacob Elordi's monster / creature that redeems the film, in addition to its beautiful gothic style and fine pacing (the runtime is long, but suitable). Overall, a great addition to the lore and worth seeing on the big screen.
Del Toro's Melancholically Radiant Vision for Shelley's Classic
Visually, the film is nothing short of a masterpiece. The set design, costumes, and cinematography are stunning, and every frame is a joy to look at. The visual effects (admirably, mostly practical effects) are spot on, and Desplat's score, albeit a little bit overly dramatic at times, is hauntingly beautiful and elevates the experience to a whole other level.
I will admit this is the first film adaptation of Mary Shelley's classic tale that I watched, but I am familiar with some of the artistic liberties Del Toro took in his adaptation, and I think the vast majority of them are beautiful and help breathe life into the tale at modern times, while also helping differentiate it from other adaptations and giving Del Toro's unique spin to it. Similarly to his work on Pinocchio (2022), you can see his admiration and respect for the source material while you can also see his personal footprint and soul poured all over the project.
Oscar Isaac is brilliant in his role as Dr. Frankenstein, and Jacob Elordi shines in a career-pivoting role. Goth and Waltz are great as well, and the film features some other pleasantly familiar faces, like Game of Thrones alums Charles Dance and David Bradley. An all-around great performance from the amazing cast completes the craft of the film as another career highlight in Del Toro's magical filmography.
I will say the movie is a little bit too long while ironically the plot also takes some shortcuts and contrivances to push things forward; but that's not as dire as it sounds, and the film is enjoyable from start to finish, with great writing and directing from Del Toro.
A poetic tale that mourns and dazzles, Del Toro's adaptation of "Frankenstein" is one of the most beautiful and well-crafted films of the year. While preserving the heart of the original tale and taking brave liberties to unify it as Guillermo's personal work, Frankenstein works on every level and manages to serve as 150 minutes of pure cinema and breathtaking entertainment.
A Symphony
This film is like an operatic symphony.
It's both beautiful and tragic. Breathtaking and challenging. This is what movies are all about. James Whale would be proud.
I saw this in Japan and because the audience is so respectful I couldn't tell if I was the only one silently weeping in the darkness.
Thank you Guillermo.
Gothic Horror is Back!
But I digress, Oscar Isaac is brilliant, no surprise there, from Drive to Ex Machina, his villain arc continues to grow like the hump on Igor's back. I look forward to his next role as usual.
I have to admit, having never seen Euphoria, I didn't know how Jacob Elordi would play out but the dude's got range! He really brought the character to life, killed it, then brought it back to life again.
Mia Goth, great mother of Pearl! I found myself falling in line behind all of the other characters in the film that fell in love with her. She never misses.
Christoph Waltz... need I say more?
Guillermo del Toro delivers once again! The visuals and storytelling kept me engaged, even when scenes would slow down, the emotion picked up. And this film is brutal! The creature does not hold back, he was put together to rip others apart.
Go to the theater to see this one while you can! Every shot is masterfully framed and the grandiose set pieces require eyes to be feasted upon the big screen.
Inside Guillermo del Toro's 'Frankenstein'
Inside Guillermo del Toro's 'Frankenstein'
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesVictor Frankenstein's laboratory and Captain Anderson's ship were fully constructed sets. "I want real sets", director Guillermo del Toro explains. "I don't want digital, I don't want AI, I don't want simulation. I want old-fashioned craftsmanship: people painting, building, hammering, plastering."
- GaffesWhen the dynamite stick explodes, the creature's clothes should have been burned or torn to shreds even if he's indestructible..
- Citations
The Creature: An idea, a feeling became clear to me. The hunter did not hate the wolf. The wolf did not hate the sheep. But violence felt inevitable between them. Perhaps, I thought, this was the way of the world. It would hunt you and kill you just for being who you are.
- Crédits fousThe Netflix logo is formed by two batteries running an electric charge in Victor Frankenstein's laboratory.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Horror's Greatest: Film Scores (2025)
- Bandes originalesRondeau (Abedelazer)
Written by Henry Purcell
Arranged by Jonathan Scott
Performed by Jonathan Scott
courtesy of: Scott Brothers Duo
Meilleurs choix
November 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
November 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
- How long is Frankenstein?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Dr. Frankenstein
- Lieux de tournage
- North Bay, Nipissing, Ontario, Canada(Location / exteriors - Arctic)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 120 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 144 496 $US
- Durée
- 2h 29min(149 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1






