Frankenstein

The film succeeds best when it remains close to Mary Shelley's original such as in its storytelling approach and varying perspectives, as well as the dialogue and references that echo the novel. I wish there had been more of this. The book is rich in philosophy, psychology and tragedy.

Del Toro doesn't fail, but I think he misses the mark at those moments where he changes the story, revising the characters' awareness and motivations. Walz's Harlander is invented and unnecessary, Isaac's Frankenstein is frenzied rather than haunted. It is Jacob Elordi's monster / creature that redeems the film, in addition to its beautiful gothic style and fine pacing (the runtime is long, but suitable). Overall, a great addition to the lore and worth seeing on the big screen.

It's no secret that talented and visionary director Del Toro has been working up the courage to complete Frankenstein, his biggest inspiration, for decades now. In interviews tailing many years he has told of his admiration for the story and it's effect upon him. Even some of his previous work has inspirations from the classic gothic novel, of course I'm referencing Blade 2 (believe it or not), where one of the reapers finally confronts his maker. And as a movie lover, nothing makes me happier than to see a director get to shoot his dream picture, especially a director who has contributed so much.

Now compared to some other reviewer's my score may seem pretty low, and let me start by saying it's going to be loved by critics and loved by award shows, and deserves the accolades it will receive, but for me personally, I respect it more than I love it.

Del Toro is a incredible director, and that's more than evident in this picture, I enjoyed the story, and his rendition of it, visually it's stunning. But, sorry to say, I'm just not a huge fan of Gothic horror, I never have been. I've tried over the years, and this movie I surprisingly enjoyed more than most, but it's something that's just not always going to be my cup of tea.

There were large portions of the movie I enjoyed, there did come a part in the movie where it headlined the title 'Part 2' which I dreaded, not because I wasn't enjoying it, but I had already felt like I watched a feature movie, yet I was only half way. It was a bit long for me. Which only felt longer because of the pacing.

On the positives, it looks great visually, set pieces are gothic but brilliant, and I loved the cast performances, especially Jacob Elordi as the The Creature. I was not familiar with this actor, but I give credit where it's due, that was a brilliant performance.

Look. If gothic horror is not your thing, still give it a chance, it can be long winded but it's a great rendition of a classic story, I'd be surprised if you hated it even if it's not your favorite genre. If you rated it higher, I'm not going to argue with you, it probably deserves it.

Experienced Del Toro's latest on the big screen in 35mm print and was left speechless. The film is far from being compact in length but managed to present some of the best cinema of 2025, an expertly crafted culmination of multiple decades of experience from Del Toro.

Visually, the film is nothing short of a masterpiece. The set design, costumes, and cinematography are stunning, and every frame is a joy to look at. The visual effects (admirably, mostly practical effects) are spot on, and Desplat's score, albeit a little bit overly dramatic at times, is hauntingly beautiful and elevates the experience to a whole other level.

I will admit this is the first film adaptation of Mary Shelley's classic tale that I watched, but I am familiar with some of the artistic liberties Del Toro took in his adaptation, and I think the vast majority of them are beautiful and help breathe life into the tale at modern times, while also helping differentiate it from other adaptations and giving Del Toro's unique spin to it. Similarly to his work on Pinocchio (2022), you can see his admiration and respect for the source material while you can also see his personal footprint and soul poured all over the project.

Oscar Isaac is brilliant in his role as Dr. Frankenstein, and Jacob Elordi shines in a career-pivoting role. Goth and Waltz are great as well, and the film features some other pleasantly familiar faces, like Game of Thrones alums Charles Dance and David Bradley. An all-around great performance from the amazing cast completes the craft of the film as another career highlight in Del Toro's magical filmography.

I will say the movie is a little bit too long while ironically the plot also takes some shortcuts and contrivances to push things forward; but that's not as dire as it sounds, and the film is enjoyable from start to finish, with great writing and directing from Del Toro.

A poetic tale that mourns and dazzles, Del Toro's adaptation of "Frankenstein" is one of the most beautiful and well-crafted films of the year. While preserving the heart of the original tale and taking brave liberties to unify it as Guillermo's personal work, Frankenstein works on every level and manages to serve as 150 minutes of pure cinema and breathtaking entertainment.

This film is peak Guillermo del Toro. Stunning cinematography, good story and character development, and stellar performances from Oscar Issac and Jacob Elordi. I went into this film with low expectations, as many films in this genre are so predictable and underwhelming. This was not the case for this film. We got a whole new look at these characters and this story, without compromising the essence of what makes it familiar. Could we have just seen the rebirth of this classic cinematic universe?

Finally someone came very close to capturing the original story. Del Toro has done an excellent job. Perhaps not for everyone, but I was enthralled. I wish it was playing in main theaters but I imagine they are worried the general superhero and monster movie crowd won't get it. Personally, this was very worth my time.