Godfather

Mainly this whole part belongs to Mohanlal himself (Lucifer), with this movie it's like he slammed a giant sword into a mountain/ground with his acting skills. But i see that a Telugu moderate actor chiranjeevi took hold of this Godfather movie as a remake and thought that he would handle it well more than legendary Mohanlal did, I've seen the movie but i don't see chiranjeevi dominated the movie, it's far worse than expected he failed doing it. Even nayanathara performance is worse,i don't see any prodigy here because the acting levels of everyone are very low and the lead actor has failed to give his best. Original is better to watch again.

This movie in my opinion is one of the worst remakes that I have ever watched. The performance of chiranjeevi was very poor compared to Mr Mohanlal who played the same role in the orginal movie Lucifer. Emotional scene felt funny to me. Roles of Vivek obroi, Manju warrier, Tovino Thomas... were far better than the remake version. It felt like the actors of the remake version haven't watched the orginal version Lucifer before acting in this movie. The direction felt annoying. The camio apprance of Salman khan was also not pleasing. Overall it felt like a bad experience for me and I wouldn't recommend you to watch this movie. Better try watching the Lucifer.

I have seen Lucifer in Malayalam with subtitles and feel of the movie always connects to the hero's characterisation.

God Father clearly missed this and just focused on adding unnecessary masala elements with unconvincing hero characterisation.

Chiranjeevi sir should stop doing these remakes and should give chance to the young directors the way Kamal Hassan done with Vikram.

Audience taste has been changed and chiranjeevis mindset stuck 10 years back when he joined politics. Please update.

Start giving chances to new director's and stop involving in scripts of the successful directors like koratala shiva.

If you have seen the original movie Lucifer then you can compare that suspense level is very high in Lucifer compared to Godfather.

Poster and trailer already reveled that there is some relation between Chiranjeevi and Salmaan and while watching the movie you can guess there is some relation.

Salmaan's role is overexaggerated in the movie and the fight seens are overextended which shifts the audiance attendance to this side character.

Also the plotting of songs are not appropriate and seems like they are trying to fit in the songs for no reason.

Over all It is not worth watching. But the original movie Lucifer deserves a watch.

The story features good content and characters.

However, the screenplay suffers from being excessively slow-paced and lacking excitement.

Both the script and direction fail to match the quality of the original version.

Chiranjeevi is suitable for the role and delivers a commendable performance in many scenes, although some are not handled as effectively.

It would be unfair to compare Chiranjeevi to Mohanlal from the original film.

Sathya Dev also performs well in his role, although not as brilliantly as Vivek Oberoi.

Nayanthara follows her usual pattern of acting, similar to her previous films like "Tulasi," "Viswasam," and "Jayasimha." There's nothing new in her portrayal.

The on-screen pairing of Chiranjeevi and Nayanthara as brother and sister appears odd.

Salman Khan's role feels wasted, or rather, a good role is wasted on Salman.

The background score lifted from Vikram Veda is funny.

The cinematography is well-executed.

Editing seems to focus excessively on slow-motion sequences.

This film is not worth watching in theaters. It would be better to wait for its release on an OTT platform, especially if you haven't seen the original "Lucifer."