NOTE IMDb
4,8/10
4,9 k
MA NOTE
Un groupe de touristes rejoint le bateau fluvial "Queen" alors qu'il s'aventure en amont, pour visiter des villages indigènes et explorer la forêt amazonienne. Mais un sombre nuage de vol gr... Tout lireUn groupe de touristes rejoint le bateau fluvial "Queen" alors qu'il s'aventure en amont, pour visiter des villages indigènes et explorer la forêt amazonienne. Mais un sombre nuage de vol gronde à bord, menaçant tous de mort.Un groupe de touristes rejoint le bateau fluvial "Queen" alors qu'il s'aventure en amont, pour visiter des villages indigènes et explorer la forêt amazonienne. Mais un sombre nuage de vol gronde à bord, menaçant tous de mort.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 70 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
All the 9 and 10 star rating are fake.
I am honestly so shocked at how bad this movie was, that I won't even bother explaining it. Story was horrible, acting was horrible, effects were horrible, and the list goes on.
Anyone who gives this movie over a 1 or 2 was either a part of the movie, related to someone in the movie, or paid to rate it highly. Period.
This is a typical f-rated movie. The best way to watch is with the sound off while wearing a blind fold.
I am honestly so shocked at how bad this movie was, that I won't even bother explaining it. Story was horrible, acting was horrible, effects were horrible, and the list goes on.
Anyone who gives this movie over a 1 or 2 was either a part of the movie, related to someone in the movie, or paid to rate it highly. Period.
This is a typical f-rated movie. The best way to watch is with the sound off while wearing a blind fold.
Its true, its not a good film, but from a technical standpoint, its deserves the three stars. The camera work is good and there are some beautiful shots taken by someone who knows what they are doing.
The script is ridiculous, 'some' of the acting is worse than barnyard productions I've seen and the screenplay isn't worthy of the disk space it took to store it. The score is terrible and overdone throughout the whole film and the direction is... I'll not go on, you get the idea.
It's definitely not worth seeing, though as background fodder, it might be something to put on while you do your chores, your taxes or just need something to lull you to sleep.
Its Hallmark channel worthy, and though the high ratings are clearly bogus, I think the one-out-of-ten scores are probably harshly trying to serve up some sort of punishment rather than reflect an accurate assessment.
I cannot recommend it.
The script is ridiculous, 'some' of the acting is worse than barnyard productions I've seen and the screenplay isn't worthy of the disk space it took to store it. The score is terrible and overdone throughout the whole film and the direction is... I'll not go on, you get the idea.
It's definitely not worth seeing, though as background fodder, it might be something to put on while you do your chores, your taxes or just need something to lull you to sleep.
Its Hallmark channel worthy, and though the high ratings are clearly bogus, I think the one-out-of-ten scores are probably harshly trying to serve up some sort of punishment rather than reflect an accurate assessment.
I cannot recommend it.
You know when you are watching something that is done on a shoestring, the only way the makers can.
Rate it how you want, but why with such venom?
I love reading the critical analysis of some of these snobs.
I bet many of them haven't dared take that step, to try and produce something from somewhere within them, and then put it on view for the world to see.
That takes guts alone.. Why such venom, for anything> Hahaha It it was by Hitchcock or Speilberg, then okay. But these people tried to do something.
Not sat behind their screens thinking..... hmmm, I have nothing else to do in my life now, I can't move on until I have vented, hahah It wasn't great, but jeez, hahaha Maybe take up a drug addiction and fill that void in your soul.
Aurevoir (That's Greek)
Rate it how you want, but why with such venom?
I love reading the critical analysis of some of these snobs.
I bet many of them haven't dared take that step, to try and produce something from somewhere within them, and then put it on view for the world to see.
That takes guts alone.. Why such venom, for anything> Hahaha It it was by Hitchcock or Speilberg, then okay. But these people tried to do something.
Not sat behind their screens thinking..... hmmm, I have nothing else to do in my life now, I can't move on until I have vented, hahah It wasn't great, but jeez, hahaha Maybe take up a drug addiction and fill that void in your soul.
Aurevoir (That's Greek)
The scenery was worthwhile, but couldn't carry the film. Nice little ship. A river tour on it might be an interesting voyage, espicially on the Amazon. The indigenous performers were the highlight. We don't often get to see scenes like that these days.
And everythings for free, so lets go hire a boat on the amazonas and shoot the movie weve always wanted to make, and of they went, family and frinds, making the screenplay at the airport, bought a camera or two at the tax free and so goes the fairytail.... just a possible scenario of the origins of this production...
which stinks to such a degree that its only watchable a double or triple speed , and make a benny hill like show outta it. Plot is stupid, acting is amateuristic stumbling, and the main set production are what you may expect in a narrow space, cause its done the difficult way on board a ship. There are only one area of the moviemaking that i can acclaim and that is the beutiful sceneries of nature shot with high quality drones that make the background frame of this production. Actually well filmed and well chosen takes that theyve mingled with the poo-rest.
So a two minus for this amazonian jungle cruise comes from the grumpy old man. I think if i had the doe and the guts i couldve made a sequel with a far better story and plot, including some piranhas and barracudas using crooks for bait, so its a no recommend whatsoever.
which stinks to such a degree that its only watchable a double or triple speed , and make a benny hill like show outta it. Plot is stupid, acting is amateuristic stumbling, and the main set production are what you may expect in a narrow space, cause its done the difficult way on board a ship. There are only one area of the moviemaking that i can acclaim and that is the beutiful sceneries of nature shot with high quality drones that make the background frame of this production. Actually well filmed and well chosen takes that theyve mingled with the poo-rest.
So a two minus for this amazonian jungle cruise comes from the grumpy old man. I think if i had the doe and the guts i couldve made a sequel with a far better story and plot, including some piranhas and barracudas using crooks for bait, so its a no recommend whatsoever.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPortuguese is the primary language spoken in Brazil.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Amazon Queen?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 100 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35:1 (letterboxed in 16:9 HD)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant