Consumed

Halverson known for direct to video film called RED Clover, Sava everyone knows him from three seasons of Chucky. Famiglietti known for Terminator 3. The story is about a former cancer patient barely made it and thrown her medical bracelet in the fire because it what we remember by. The creature is intense and dripping nose goop. The Performances are actually not bad Halverson, Famiglietti and Sava does a fantastic job with Resulting with a positive role balances. 20% of this film had lack of smoke-cloud effect and the story does not have enough power to contribute its energy enough. Unexpected surprised creature feature that I'd never heard off, love my lowest expectations indie production films and small cast works for that nature forest woods atmosphere.

Imagine yourself smacking a crippled person. It's not the worst you can do, but it's definitely bad. That represents this movie. Without acknowledging the bad CGI, the awful creature design, the terrible acting, the most terrible thing is its screenplay. A half-baked couple drama, with a half-baked monster movie, with a half-baked character development.

When a young film camera is misbehaving, mom film camera tells it that "if you keep misbehaving, you'll end up being used to film a movie like Consumed".

So i read his super comment and i knew it was a gonna be trash. But he wrote his comment so hilarious that i literally had to watch this movie no matter how bad it is. The marketing team of this movie - if there is such thing - should hire him as a reverse psychology expert. Thank you TopReviewer, because of you i was ready to watch

yet i was not ready by the terrible acting of the Dudette. And making an extremely close shot make her look like a fish, didnt they teach in the art schools that do not reach the person with the camera but zoom it otherwise lenses will show the person like a handicapped. Now the acting and directing was horrible, but i kind of liked the idea of the story but only very bad executed. The limited budget didnt show us wendigo a lot but still makes no sense when that thing in some scenes can travel almost in a speed of light but somehow a woman that carries a crippled husband is not catchable.

Well i watched the movie as fun, not for having fun to watching the movie but to have fun of the movie and it worked up to some level. Thx TopReviewer.

Sometimes you need to Watch a Movie (like: 'Battlefield Earth' 'Blair Witch 2' -or- 'The New Exorcist' ) to fully appreciate just how Truly BAD it is. And despite the abysmal reviews on both sides of the aisle (which may seem hyperbolic to some): I can state with absolute certainty that this Movie is in fact BAD.

The Script, Sound, Editing, Acting & Creature Effects were all acutely terrible. The only saving grace was some of the Photography & Production Value (i.e. The Shot-framing, Establishing Shots -&- Color-grading etc.)

Everything else was done haphazardly & felt just wrong. If this was the filmmakers first journey into the art of celluloid then I could perhaps understand, but that still doesn't change the fact that this film was abominable in it's attempt to entertain, captivate & thrill it's paying audience. (** 2 Stars out of 10)

Horrible movie, so childish, a waste of time!

Deserves 0.5 out of 100.

Weak plot, weak acting and it doesn't scare you at all. So childish as well it's like taken from a fairytale.

And white people if you hear something that sounds crazy scary and you are in the middle of nowhere why the heck would you go out of your tent and look for that sound? It doesn't make any sense to any human being. Why would the actress run directly to see the monster?? Logically you should run away and never look back neverr.

In conclusion, the movie sucks, doesn't deserve your time and it is not scary at all even to young children.