NOTE IMDb
3,5/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Une joueuse de haut niveau qui quitte son équipe d'e-sports universitaire en raison du sexisme de ses homologues masculins.Une joueuse de haut niveau qui quitte son équipe d'e-sports universitaire en raison du sexisme de ses homologues masculins.Une joueuse de haut niveau qui quitte son équipe d'e-sports universitaire en raison du sexisme de ses homologues masculins.
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Kevin P. Farley
- Dean Davis
- (as Kevin Farley)
Avis à la une
There are so many faults in this movie it is hard to find a place to start. Firstly the acting, characters, directing, and writing isn't good. Every scene in the movie had so many cringeworthy lines in it and all the characters are either hyperbolized stereotypes or just ultra diverse pandering. Then there is the competitive gaming aspect of it. The way that the team starts just isn't real. Collegiate teams have lots of scouting and tryouts to join the team. Also there are very few women who play games let alone play enough to climb the ladder to pro. You actually need to be good at the game and high ranked. You don't just decide you want to start a team and recruit random people and hold interviews. Also you don't compete in the "collegiate esport league". Also you don't just "train" by drinking and playing nintendo 64 games. Then there is the game part. This is a real game, but as the movie goes on the game gets twisted and is just used as plot armor and the scenes with the chicken burning everything down and the blood character just morphing around are just not real. Overall. The movie is clearly just a stunt made by people who know nothing about the gaming scene. If they wanted to make a movie about diversity or sexism they should have just done that instead of masquerading their intentions with this movie.
I've never rated a movie less than 5/10...
I can usually find some light to bring it up a tad...
This? I'd give it a zero if I could.
The script is horrible. The scenes make no sense. The relationships are completely unbelievable. Ruby Rose's acting is poor.
The gaming events should be intense, but they just put you to sleep.
It was utter cringe.
This? I'd give it a zero if I could.
The script is horrible. The scenes make no sense. The relationships are completely unbelievable. Ruby Rose's acting is poor.
The gaming events should be intense, but they just put you to sleep.
It was utter cringe.
3/10 - I will admit there were a few laughs courtesy of Paris Berelc and Hari Nef in between the constant cringe and near constant attempts to ripoff Pitch Perfect, but my biggest question is how did they manage to get so many big names for this and why these actors haven't fired their agents already.
Production value was not the problem, it was more like the story and what they try to attend with this movie. It´s about a girl who founds an all womens esports team with a few non-professional gamers. At this point you can guess the whole plot already. At the beginning the´re really bad and then they rise and get better and all that stuff...Predictable. Screenwriting wasn´t any better, some dialogues are just cringe, some actions just not fitting. Feels like a B-movie, but not a good one. But I can see it that way, that the filmmakers were given the possibility to make movie, to get experience. Nobody can expect to be pro just in a minute. That´s why I am suprised with the production value, it´s not over the top, but still high for an amateur like movie.
Acting was ok, i guess they intended to overact a little.
The main reason, why this movie is not working out is that they don´t really have choosen a target group. I mean it is about gaming, you can make movie for gamers or you can try to get non-gamers, too. I guess they tried to get the whole audience, but it´s not working out. It´s difficult to get an whole audience, Free Guy would be a good example were it worked out, but this is an another level of filmmaking. If they just focused on gamers, they could´ve focused on a more advanced plot, built tension by using all what competitive gaming contains and not just building a rivaly between teams.
But in the end they missed the gamer audience as well as the non-gamers.
Still 3/10, because I like that they tried and they had the possibility to make this movie. If they learned from it and come up with more experience it was worth it.
Acting was ok, i guess they intended to overact a little.
The main reason, why this movie is not working out is that they don´t really have choosen a target group. I mean it is about gaming, you can make movie for gamers or you can try to get non-gamers, too. I guess they tried to get the whole audience, but it´s not working out. It´s difficult to get an whole audience, Free Guy would be a good example were it worked out, but this is an another level of filmmaking. If they just focused on gamers, they could´ve focused on a more advanced plot, built tension by using all what competitive gaming contains and not just building a rivaly between teams.
But in the end they missed the gamer audience as well as the non-gamers.
Still 3/10, because I like that they tried and they had the possibility to make this movie. If they learned from it and come up with more experience it was worth it.
Just watched this and it was just awful. A lot of amateur actors, and a clinchen story. Save yourself the time and watch something else. This was just another woke-crap movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesElliot Page was originally attached to play Parker, but the role ultimately went to Ruby Rose.
- GaffesAfter Lilly changes her gaming character to a chicken in the semi-finals, the Polygon Captain - from the opposing team - makes a joke about a chicken being fried. Moments later, when Lilly's character dominates the game, the Polygon Captain questions out loud, in surprise, that there's a chicken in the game.
- ConnexionsReferences Le Magicien d'Oz (1939)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 1UP?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 379 $US
- Durée1 heure 40 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant