NOTE IMDb
6,6/10
2,2 k
MA NOTE
Une nouvelle adaptation du roman classique The Darling Buds of May de S.E. Bates qui suit les aventures chaleureuses de l'emblématique famille Larkin dans la campagne idyllique du Kent.Une nouvelle adaptation du roman classique The Darling Buds of May de S.E. Bates qui suit les aventures chaleureuses de l'emblématique famille Larkin dans la campagne idyllique du Kent.Une nouvelle adaptation du roman classique The Darling Buds of May de S.E. Bates qui suit les aventures chaleureuses de l'emblématique famille Larkin dans la campagne idyllique du Kent.
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I thought I'd give it a chance, but the insistence on creating a false picture of British country life at the time has finished it for me.
I hope it doesn't return.
I hope it doesn't return.
I know it seems racist to say this and I don't want to be that way but as others have said this would not have been a multi-cultural society at that time. For some of us and what we know about the Darling buds of May etc adding characters of non-Caucasian ethnicity is just more tokenism and sometimes we could live without it. Not that it doesn't have its place it's just lets make it appropriate. Anything else is patronising.
Well I've watched parts of two episodes of this awful remark of the Darling Buds of May and I hope no more episodes are planned. The actors are ill-suited to the characters and the series lacks all the charm and atmosphere of the books and the original. The Christmas episode was embarrassing - so clearly shot on what looked like the hottest day of the year with trees in full leaf and the sun high in the sky. Standing in the shade doesn't make it look like winter you know!! I gather certain characters were changed in order to be inclusive and politically correct. Why?? Why not be true to the book and the times as represented by the author? A poor show all round IMO.
I don't really understand the motivation behind this (extremely loose) adaptation of HE Bates' novels.
A lot of reviewers have commented on the anachronistic racial diversity. It is anachronistic but that doesn't particularly bother me, the problem is more that the script sounds "written by white people" and is very heavy-handed with how it manages that aspect.
What does bother me is jamming 2020s morals and mores into a 1950s setting. The original series and books are very much laid back, laissez-faire, rural romping and hedonism. Amoral, perhaps.
This new series is full of contemporary angst and grating moralising. Ma sounding like a modern-day parenting manual. Lectures on classism. Mariette endlessly wanting to widen her horizons, which cheapens the whole "rural idyll" that the Larkins' village represents.
Then weird plot changes. Why is Oscar no longer their baby? The Larkin children getting it into their heads that Pa is committing adultery. The silly Charley/Tom rivalry.
It's not unenjoyable, but a lot of it just feels pointless, and it lacks the innocent pleasure of the books and the earlier series.
I would urge anyone watching this to give the earlier series a go if you haven't seen it, as well as read the books. There's so much more to love there.
A lot of reviewers have commented on the anachronistic racial diversity. It is anachronistic but that doesn't particularly bother me, the problem is more that the script sounds "written by white people" and is very heavy-handed with how it manages that aspect.
What does bother me is jamming 2020s morals and mores into a 1950s setting. The original series and books are very much laid back, laissez-faire, rural romping and hedonism. Amoral, perhaps.
This new series is full of contemporary angst and grating moralising. Ma sounding like a modern-day parenting manual. Lectures on classism. Mariette endlessly wanting to widen her horizons, which cheapens the whole "rural idyll" that the Larkins' village represents.
Then weird plot changes. Why is Oscar no longer their baby? The Larkin children getting it into their heads that Pa is committing adultery. The silly Charley/Tom rivalry.
It's not unenjoyable, but a lot of it just feels pointless, and it lacks the innocent pleasure of the books and the earlier series.
I would urge anyone watching this to give the earlier series a go if you haven't seen it, as well as read the books. There's so much more to love there.
I can't believe all the negative comments!!! Maybe you have to be English to appreciate this lovely, light-hearted, sunny TV series! It's a real breath of fresh air as well as a great look at life in England during that era! Bradley Walsh is superb as Pop Larkin and the rest of the cast, so well chosen. I can't wait for the next series!!!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Larkins (2021) is not a continuation of the beloved 1990s version The Darling Buds of May (1991), but a brand-new revival of the iconic books for ITV.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Larkins have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant