Alors que la guerre froide fait rage, l'espion réticent Harry Palmer se retrouve au centre d'une dangereuse mission d'infiltration, dans laquelle il doit utiliser ses ressources pour retrouv... Tout lireAlors que la guerre froide fait rage, l'espion réticent Harry Palmer se retrouve au centre d'une dangereuse mission d'infiltration, dans laquelle il doit utiliser ses ressources pour retrouver un scientifique nucléaire britannique disparu.Alors que la guerre froide fait rage, l'espion réticent Harry Palmer se retrouve au centre d'une dangereuse mission d'infiltration, dans laquelle il doit utiliser ses ressources pour retrouver un scientifique nucléaire britannique disparu.
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
You can't compare this to an excellent movie made in the 60s.
This is of its time and more faithful to book and the casting is not as bad as some of the other reviews would make you think.
Watch it and make your own mind up! Don't let the detractors brainwash you!
That's a job for the Ipcress file.
This is of its time and more faithful to book and the casting is not as bad as some of the other reviews would make you think.
Watch it and make your own mind up! Don't let the detractors brainwash you!
That's a job for the Ipcress file.
While some may be overly critical of this show by comparing it to the classic 1965 movie, I think this show can stand on its own. I loved the "vintage" cinematic look they achieved. They could have done something atrocious as many remakes do, of "re-imagining" to the modern era (and they certainly could have--the cold war is back). As this show sets out to be a very different animal than the earlier classic, there's no need to compare.
The story moves quickly and smoothly, though it meanders a bit in the middle episodes to establish a second arc. But very little is wasted; no unnecessary side arcs, no eyerolling overtures to politically correctness or woke agenda. It stays laser-focused on telling the story.
The acting is very good if not excellent. Cole doesn't fit the stereotype British agent, but he makes it work, though he deadpans most scenes. Boynton is well cast as a beautiful but cold and bitter agent who warms up to Palmer in a believable way, and really carries the show. Hollander gives an excellent performance, as well, as a pragmatic veteran spook who finds himself trapped by his past.
I'm not sure if they will fabricate a second series, but this first one can stand alone very nicely.
The story moves quickly and smoothly, though it meanders a bit in the middle episodes to establish a second arc. But very little is wasted; no unnecessary side arcs, no eyerolling overtures to politically correctness or woke agenda. It stays laser-focused on telling the story.
The acting is very good if not excellent. Cole doesn't fit the stereotype British agent, but he makes it work, though he deadpans most scenes. Boynton is well cast as a beautiful but cold and bitter agent who warms up to Palmer in a believable way, and really carries the show. Hollander gives an excellent performance, as well, as a pragmatic veteran spook who finds himself trapped by his past.
I'm not sure if they will fabricate a second series, but this first one can stand alone very nicely.
I think the reviews here are overly negative.
Sure, we all like to stand up for old movies with actors like Michael Cain and proudly announce how superior that is to anything that's new. This is also the people that think vinyl is superior due to the warmer sound....
I thought this show was pretty entertaining. Sure, it has its flaws - it struggles to find its place in comedy, drama and thriller - but does it have to be one thing?
And sure the angled camera shots gets REALLY old already half-way through episode one - but, I just felt that it added to the whole 'cartoonish' take on the story. It doesn't take itself too seriously. It has some fun with the source material.
I for one rather enjoyed the ride.
Sure, we all like to stand up for old movies with actors like Michael Cain and proudly announce how superior that is to anything that's new. This is also the people that think vinyl is superior due to the warmer sound....
I thought this show was pretty entertaining. Sure, it has its flaws - it struggles to find its place in comedy, drama and thriller - but does it have to be one thing?
And sure the angled camera shots gets REALLY old already half-way through episode one - but, I just felt that it added to the whole 'cartoonish' take on the story. It doesn't take itself too seriously. It has some fun with the source material.
I for one rather enjoyed the ride.
I have just seen episode two and this is getting better and better. Hard not to compare to the original, but the leads all do a good job. A slow burner, yes, and not for anyone who lives at a fast pace. But an evolving story, believable characters and on gripping plot. Sit down, bin your phone and watch this.
New six part TV adaptation of Len Deighton's classic spy thriller with the protagonist spy Harry Palmer played so memorably by Michael Caine in the 1965 film.
I liked it, excellent period detailing, a snappy soundtrack, a strong ensemble cast throughout, so stylish and a script as sharp as Harry Palmer's suits. Production values were high and it was really well directed.
Joe Cole vs. Michael Caine - well who was ever going to top Caine? But he put up a good fight and played it well in his own understated way - Lucy Boynton was a revelation and Tom Hollander also excelled. All round a winner and the ending was satisfying and very neatly done.
Congrats to all involved, can see a few Bafta's heading its way..
I liked it, excellent period detailing, a snappy soundtrack, a strong ensemble cast throughout, so stylish and a script as sharp as Harry Palmer's suits. Production values were high and it was really well directed.
Joe Cole vs. Michael Caine - well who was ever going to top Caine? But he put up a good fight and played it well in his own understated way - Lucy Boynton was a revelation and Tom Hollander also excelled. All round a winner and the ending was satisfying and very neatly done.
Congrats to all involved, can see a few Bafta's heading its way..
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe character names "Harry Palmer" and Jean Courtney" are retained for the central characters from the 1965 film. In the novel, the hero has no name - although it is specifically stated that his name is NOT Harry - whilst Jean is surnamed "Tonneson".
- GaffesWhilst in the South Pacific, Harry has no trouble making a phone call to Britain. In 1963, before satellite communications, this would in fact have been very difficult and time consuming. He would have had to call the operator and book a call, which would have had to travel over copper cables. At that time you could not even call the USA from Britain without booking a call with the operator.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Épisode #5.55 (2022)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Ipcress File have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Ipcress File
- Lieux de tournage
- Zagreb, Croatie(Berlin, Vienna, Helsinki exteriors)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant