Pendant près de 200 ans, les sceptiques et les critiques ont essayé d'expliquer ce que de nombreux témoins du Livre de Mormon ont déclaré: ils avaient vu des anges et soulevé des plaques de ... Tout lirePendant près de 200 ans, les sceptiques et les critiques ont essayé d'expliquer ce que de nombreux témoins du Livre de Mormon ont déclaré: ils avaient vu des anges et soulevé des plaques de métal doré contenant des inscriptions anciennes.Pendant près de 200 ans, les sceptiques et les critiques ont essayé d'expliquer ce que de nombreux témoins du Livre de Mormon ont déclaré: ils avaient vu des anges et soulevé des plaques de métal doré contenant des inscriptions anciennes.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Lily Brady
- Harris Child #2
- (as Lily Bradley)
Avis à la une
I wish I could give Witnesses a higher rating. After all, it means well, and the acting is good. However, as a film, it's a little messy. First of all, it's a frame story, so there's that element, and then they have three different accounts they're trying to tell at the same time. Plus, in addition to all that, they also jump around in time within those accounts. It gets confusing. And I feel like they tried to cram too much into the movie. I'm fairly familiar with the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but I imagine Witnesses would be quite confusing for someone who isn't.
I can't believe some reviewers ase calling this factual in any way. It really proves that Mormons don't know their own history other than the sugar coated stories they're told as children.
This movie is not historically accurate, it's more fan fiction which would be fine but it claims to be accurate.
This movie is not historically accurate, it's more fan fiction which would be fine but it claims to be accurate.
It was good to see that the movie did not just gloss over the negative events of that day. And did not hide the fact that the witnesses all had issues with Joseph Smith and left the church.
I really enjoyed this film.
First, it was not cheesy like many can be in this genre.
Second, the acting, cinematography, music, editing, sets, costumes, etc. Were all very well done and professional. This was a very well-built film.
Third, the story jumped around a lot chronologically. While that can make for a more interesting film - and people already familiar with the origins of the Church probably followed the story just fine - those who are less familiar with the founding of the Church will probably be confused at times.
For example, why is Joseph Smith falling? Oh, never mind; it was just a dream. Wait, he's dead? Was that from the fall or something else?
The scene only makes sense if you already know the story.
But perhaps my favorite thing about the film is that it didn't shy away from the controversial parts of Church history. Rather than gloss over them or skip them altogether, the film showed how those events impacted the decisions of early Church members and leaders.
The film gives color to the black and white understanding many of us think we have of these people.
As a result, I have so much more appreciation and respect for David Whitmer, Martin Harris, and Oliver Cowdery.
If you are a Latter-day Saint, this is a must-see movie.
I'm looking forward to owning it when it comes out on disc.
First, it was not cheesy like many can be in this genre.
Second, the acting, cinematography, music, editing, sets, costumes, etc. Were all very well done and professional. This was a very well-built film.
Third, the story jumped around a lot chronologically. While that can make for a more interesting film - and people already familiar with the origins of the Church probably followed the story just fine - those who are less familiar with the founding of the Church will probably be confused at times.
For example, why is Joseph Smith falling? Oh, never mind; it was just a dream. Wait, he's dead? Was that from the fall or something else?
The scene only makes sense if you already know the story.
But perhaps my favorite thing about the film is that it didn't shy away from the controversial parts of Church history. Rather than gloss over them or skip them altogether, the film showed how those events impacted the decisions of early Church members and leaders.
The film gives color to the black and white understanding many of us think we have of these people.
As a result, I have so much more appreciation and respect for David Whitmer, Martin Harris, and Oliver Cowdery.
If you are a Latter-day Saint, this is a must-see movie.
I'm looking forward to owning it when it comes out on disc.
The movie was very well done, with great acting, videography, and music. And it was historically accurate. I also appreciated how it adeptly handled sometimes difficult periods in the history of the witnesses.
Although I appreciated the flashback approach, I can see how that would be a bit confusing for those who are not familiar with the history. So it may be helpful for someone to briefly familiarize themselves with the basic story of the three witnesses before watching the movie.
But all in all, the movie was very inspiring.
Although I appreciated the flashback approach, I can see how that would be a bit confusing for those who are not familiar with the history. So it may be helpful for someone to briefly familiarize themselves with the basic story of the three witnesses before watching the movie.
But all in all, the movie was very inspiring.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Witnesses?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 855 765 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 134 490 $US
- 6 juin 2021
- Montant brut mondial
- 855 765 $US
- Durée1 heure 50 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant