Adam the First

Oakes Fegley, a name familiar to many Person of Interest fans despite his brief three-episode stint as Gabriel Hayward, has carved out a surprisingly successful film career since then.

Adam the First starts off promising enough, but it took an unexpected turn that left me scratching my head. The film abruptly veers into Christian territory, transforming what could have been a compelling narrative into something that feels a bit preachy. While I appreciate stories with religious themes, I'm not a fan of films that come across as overt propaganda, regardless of the political or religious viewpoint.

It's not uncommon for American and Canadian actors to appear in such films, and it seems even the beloved David Duchovny couldn't resist. However, his presence is disappointingly minimal, barely justifying his name in the credits. It's as if he had a personal connection to the project and simply wanted to lend his support, because his impact on the film is negligible.

Fegley, on the other hand, delivers a commendable performance, showcasing the talent that has propelled him to success. He manages to shine even when the script falters, bringing a depth and authenticity to his character that transcends the film's shortcomings.

Despite its missteps, Adam the First isn't a complete disaster. The cinematography is visually appealing, capturing the natural beauty of the Mississippi setting. The film also boasts a few genuinely touching moments that resonate emotionally, even if they are overshadowed by the heavy-handed religious messaging.

In the end, Adam the First is a mixed bag. It's a film with potential that ultimately falls short due to its overemphasis on religious themes. It's a shame, because Fegley's performance and the film's visual appeal deserve better. If you're looking for a thought-provoking drama, you might find something to appreciate here, but be prepared for a dose of Christian messaging that might not be to everyone's taste.

Here is a script which opens with an unexpected scenario which elicits the "usual" sorts of expectations going forward. Now let's go to the end--after the credits roll--the very end of film and then think back over everything that's transpired. All expectations are turned inside out and upside down. Just as you start thinking you know where it's going there's just enough of spin to set you off balance with a surprise. It's not a perfect film --but it is one that makes you think a lot about human nature. And by the end there's a LOT to think about regarding human motives, intentions--and love. An unexpected pleasure for those who appreciate the unexpected instead of formula scripts. Oakes Fegley--yeah, he carries the film very well.

Lush cinematography and a great script make for an excellent movie. The characters are believable and seem real. The film was made in Mississippi and showcases much of the natural beauty that the state offers. The wardrobe is interesting and fits the script well. The characters' hair and makeup are expertly done.

I have ADHD and this movie was so well made that it kept my attention focused the entire time. The storyline is interesting and keeps you wondering what is going to happen next. The movie is full of great actors such as David Duchovny, Oakes Fegley, Larry Pine, Kernesha Steele and many more.

Adam (Oakes Fegley) has been raised in the woods by his not-father James (David Duchovny). They are tracked down and raided by bounty hunters. James and his girlfriend are killed. Before dying, James gives Adam his real father's name and three addresses. Adam sets out to find him.

I don't like Adam and that's as simple as that. I stop caring about him, his quest, and his happily ever after. He is one of those annoying teenage boys who don't think beyond his two feet. The actor is also doing the hesitation while being boldly secure at other times. I really got annoyed with the first Jacob Watterson. If Jacob is a real criminal, he would have told the kid to f off. I couldn't take his patience with the kid. I understand the performance and the writing. I just don't like it.

It's not a sci-fi , fantasy or horror feature but anyway you need gallons of suspension of disbelief to take anything serious in this movie. The stupid, shallow, silly, underscripted story, dialogues and scenes that nobody in not any way possibly can take serious combined with the lack of any possible inspiration on the theme makes you think that this movie was written for the school play of a primary school. The worst thing would be that anyone involved in making this film was thinking that they were really making a serious movie about abundant children. But, wait a minute, maybe I saw a deadpan comedy or a satire? It must be that because I really can't believe that the agent of Oakes Fegley tried to ruin the career of a very talented actor.