Les aventures des enfants du chemin de fer
Titre original : The Railway Children Return
NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
1,7 k
MA NOTE
Suivez un groupe d'enfants évacués dans un village du Yorkshire pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, où ils rencontrent un jeune soldat qui, comme eux, est loin de chez lui.Suivez un groupe d'enfants évacués dans un village du Yorkshire pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, où ils rencontrent un jeune soldat qui, comme eux, est loin de chez lui.Suivez un groupe d'enfants évacués dans un village du Yorkshire pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, où ils rencontrent un jeune soldat qui, comme eux, est loin de chez lui.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Liam Dillon
- Amercian Officer
- (as Liam Dhillon)
Micky Williams
- Children's Dad
- (as Mickey Williams)
Avis à la une
It was a good idea to update the railway children story of the Second World War but an absolutely dumb idea to put modern ideas of racism - presumably to please the woke crowd - into it. Come on this is a children's film. We know that racism existed in the American army but the enemy was not the Americans but the Nazis. Even the murderous Joe Stalin was on our side! The idiots who rewrite history like this give our children the wrong idea, that somehow the brave lads who went to war against one of the most murderous regimes ever were the bad guys. These things are just totally annoying and totally out of place in children's films. Another example of woke virtue signalling. The movie could've been made a lot more entertaining with a lot better and more imaginative screenplay. Hopeless!
Having seen the original Railway Children numerous times since it was first released in 1970, I had high hopes for this film, on the basis that Jenny Agutter had agreed to appear in it. However, I was sorely disappointed, as historical inaccuracies and retrospective applied politically correct ideas totally ruined the film for me. To give just a few examples:
The film is based on children being evacuated from Manchester in 1944 in response to a renewed German bombing offensive. While such an offensive did occur (and was known as the Baby Blitz) it was largely concentrated on London and the south east of England.
Bobbie's grandson, Thomas, had a far too broad Yorkshire accent for someone from a middle-class family.
Lily would not have been detained for a prolonged period by the American MPs, but would have been handed over to the British police at the earliest opportunity.
The British policemen would have been wearing helmets and not flat caps.
Lily seeking to hide Abe's army uniform by giving him civilian clothes is completely ludicrous, as he would have been immediately identifiable by his skin colour (or perhaps color).
A young man with Down's syndrome would not have been employed as a telegraph boy at that time.
The American general at the end of the film would not have been black.
The film is based on children being evacuated from Manchester in 1944 in response to a renewed German bombing offensive. While such an offensive did occur (and was known as the Baby Blitz) it was largely concentrated on London and the south east of England.
Bobbie's grandson, Thomas, had a far too broad Yorkshire accent for someone from a middle-class family.
Lily would not have been detained for a prolonged period by the American MPs, but would have been handed over to the British police at the earliest opportunity.
The British policemen would have been wearing helmets and not flat caps.
Lily seeking to hide Abe's army uniform by giving him civilian clothes is completely ludicrous, as he would have been immediately identifiable by his skin colour (or perhaps color).
A young man with Down's syndrome would not have been employed as a telegraph boy at that time.
The American general at the end of the film would not have been black.
Trading on the goodwill generated by the original,this quickly dispels any such feeling. A plot which has little of the warmth and charm of the original. It then tries to copy the climax of the original. The music is overbearing.
Interesting to see Tom Courtney,other than that a total non event.
Interesting to see Tom Courtney,other than that a total non event.
Where to start :
Good points : none
Pointless sequel, yet another example of the talentless chimps beating on keyboards to produce an awful script for a shameless money making grab on the back of a classic
I hope they paid Jenny Agutter a lot of money for her short appearances.
Absolute rubbish, full of 'woke' B. S.
If you have fond memories of the classic original don't waste your money.
Good points : none
Pointless sequel, yet another example of the talentless chimps beating on keyboards to produce an awful script for a shameless money making grab on the back of a classic
I hope they paid Jenny Agutter a lot of money for her short appearances.
Absolute rubbish, full of 'woke' B. S.
If you have fond memories of the classic original don't waste your money.
I gave up half way through & I rarely do that, some part of me has faith that things will improve, they really didn't!!!
I can't remain PC & give this my honest opinion, but do anything with your time rather than spend it watching this!!
It does of course have Jenny Agutter, but she should not have lowered herself to be involved!!! Lionel Jeffries would be turning in his grave.
I'd watch the original any time, but not this ridiculous pile of ****!
Didn't even see much in the way of actual trains or railways to be honest, just some carriages in a siding!
I wanted it to relight the childhood feelings that the original did, I wanted it to be at least watchable & ideally good, alas no!!!!
Do yourselves a favour and don't bother!!
I can't remain PC & give this my honest opinion, but do anything with your time rather than spend it watching this!!
It does of course have Jenny Agutter, but she should not have lowered herself to be involved!!! Lionel Jeffries would be turning in his grave.
I'd watch the original any time, but not this ridiculous pile of ****!
Didn't even see much in the way of actual trains or railways to be honest, just some carriages in a siding!
I wanted it to relight the childhood feelings that the original did, I wanted it to be at least watchable & ideally good, alas no!!!!
Do yourselves a favour and don't bother!!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesUtilises the same Yorkshire locations as the 1970 film this story follows.
- GaffesThe blackout did not appear to be in force in Oakworth. In many scenes, from Lily climbing out of the window and running down the field with a torch, to front doors being opened in a blaze of light, there was no indication that a blackout was in force at all.
Blackout regulations started on 1st September 1939 and ended in May 1945. Rules were relaxed slightly in September 1944, but only to allow very low levels of lighting, no brighter than moonlight.
Lily's torch would have been pasted over with dark paper to dim the beam, or black paper with a slit in it.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Railway Children Return?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Railway Children
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 466 391 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 245 904 $US
- 25 sept. 2022
- Montant brut mondial
- 4 298 731 $US
- Durée
- 1h 39min(99 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant