NOTE IMDb
7,0/10
4,4 k
MA NOTE
Une histoire captivante qui explore la poursuite du « rêve chinois ». Ce documentaire d'observation présente une vision contemporaine de la Chine qui privilégie avant tout la productivité et... Tout lireUne histoire captivante qui explore la poursuite du « rêve chinois ». Ce documentaire d'observation présente une vision contemporaine de la Chine qui privilégie avant tout la productivité et l'innovation.Une histoire captivante qui explore la poursuite du « rêve chinois ». Ce documentaire d'observation présente une vision contemporaine de la Chine qui privilégie avant tout la productivité et l'innovation.
- Réalisation
- Nommé pour 1 Oscar
- 10 victoires et 25 nominations au total
Avis à la une
1. For one who grow up and live in this country, this documentary gives me no new information than what I've known. It's kind of like a collection of contemporary topics in China. Maybe for foreigners, some parts of it are shocking.
2. And this point 1, kind of a defect, goes directly to the numbness of people, including me. We've lived with so many ridiculous phenomena and how have we got so numb for all these matters?
3. Everyone will become one of the dolls -- not a human, but a thing, a doll.
4. The reason why I'm not giving it a higher score: the problem this film wants to talk about need more materials. It can become a 3 hours film or even longer.
2. And this point 1, kind of a defect, goes directly to the numbness of people, including me. We've lived with so many ridiculous phenomena and how have we got so numb for all these matters?
3. Everyone will become one of the dolls -- not a human, but a thing, a doll.
4. The reason why I'm not giving it a higher score: the problem this film wants to talk about need more materials. It can become a 3 hours film or even longer.
A visually hypnotic documentary that observes the relentless monotony of the enormous Chinese machine. You get a real sense of the plague of absolute capitalism that is driving that machine -- to what is already global domination and will eventually, decades from now, lead to a desperate collapse, similar to the one America is having right now.
This is a visually stunning documentary about the ideology used in China to acquire acquiescence from the lower class workers in the factories, restaurants, resorts, etc who are sold a dream of one day being able to join the elite classes if they work hard enough. Almost mesmerizing with its cinematography, akin to the dreams of consumerism and the narratives of wealth that are being sold to the underclass workers, the film nicely illustrates the Chinese economy of the present: the same old drudgery and toil simply with a bright and shiny demeanor. I very much enjoyed the first time director's attention to detail and storytelling style and I'm excited to see the films that follow.
Was it intriguing to anyone else how luxurious this document looked? Especially as the film in part strongly wishes to state that everything that glitters is not twitter gold.
The film is from 2021 (and footage before) so the tale likely has changed somewhat. Certainly the world has, but there is a core here that does not change over time and over borders/oceans.
There was an Economist Podcast on President Xi I listened to a while back. Granted anything that fits in a short review or even a multi-part podcast trying to describe China will wind up too narrow, however one message from that recalled the old English sententia : a rising tide floats all boats.
That if Xi could spread enough financial success across many classes/divides, some other freedoms and concerns could be overlooked. That seems to wash up here as well, from the aquariums to the wine tasting to the water parks to the technicolor jellyfish. Shot sure lingered on them.
Is that us, consumers consumed by capitalistic tides?
I've seen other reviewers ask how is it possible that Kingdon got such access. First China is not North Korea (although they surely keep that crazy empire afloat). Also is this film pretty damning on the ventures of capitalism. Am I right Young Pioneers? Heard about this via my son's documentary film class at UCSC, and suspect it was met with resounding applause.
The film shows more than it says, which is good for me. Some of the influencer/butler dreaming of a better way are so sad to see for me. Granted my level of desperation and delusion may be intertwined and fortunately low.
Yes I've been to meetings where people want me to chant along to some slogan, and all of my energy goes to not rolling my eyes. And I never think I will be kicked to the ground and have to do push-ups.
But if you really believe such denigration is a (the only?) way up and out, well maybe you would show the right number of teeth, and slap your co-worker as hard as possible.
Clearly the camera is not a candid spy here. People are very aware of its presence. Painfully so at times. Thus I'm hesitant to paint with too broad a brush. People may have more dignity than fits in high-definition clips.
The movie moves with force, and Dan Deacon's soundtrack certainly helps. Turn it off at times and watch, it's quite a different experience. My son and his class are going to watch Koyaanisqatsi too. The films while different share a sort of vibe and approach, dare I say Deacon's soundtrack is more expansive than Glass's?
Some of the drone shots made me think that while an eagle can see a lot from so high, it cannot eat.
Anyways, I will seek out other films from Kingdon, and finish her Tribeca Q&A bonus on this disc, I had to pause that to not have it tell me what I thought about the movie. Thought reform comes in many ways and waves.
Two long shot connections.
First, watching the water park and some other dense scenes eerily reminded me of "Mad God." Which if you want an over-the-top look at mass mulch mankind merchandising, and in often gruesome stop-animation no less, you might want to check out.
Secondly, at times I found myself thinking about the Westworld HBO series. Well, the first season or two, in part due to the effectiveness in Deacon's score. It makes me sad actually, as I need to believe in a little dignity for all people, on all parts of the globe.
My last thought in watching the people on character throwing themselves so into their dream/duties, is that China may not just out-number the USA, but beat us at some of our dangerous delusions.
And yes, I know the USA has long fed its excesses off of China, from container ships and fentanyl caravans. I hope the USA does not return that dubious favor.
The film is from 2021 (and footage before) so the tale likely has changed somewhat. Certainly the world has, but there is a core here that does not change over time and over borders/oceans.
There was an Economist Podcast on President Xi I listened to a while back. Granted anything that fits in a short review or even a multi-part podcast trying to describe China will wind up too narrow, however one message from that recalled the old English sententia : a rising tide floats all boats.
That if Xi could spread enough financial success across many classes/divides, some other freedoms and concerns could be overlooked. That seems to wash up here as well, from the aquariums to the wine tasting to the water parks to the technicolor jellyfish. Shot sure lingered on them.
Is that us, consumers consumed by capitalistic tides?
I've seen other reviewers ask how is it possible that Kingdon got such access. First China is not North Korea (although they surely keep that crazy empire afloat). Also is this film pretty damning on the ventures of capitalism. Am I right Young Pioneers? Heard about this via my son's documentary film class at UCSC, and suspect it was met with resounding applause.
The film shows more than it says, which is good for me. Some of the influencer/butler dreaming of a better way are so sad to see for me. Granted my level of desperation and delusion may be intertwined and fortunately low.
Yes I've been to meetings where people want me to chant along to some slogan, and all of my energy goes to not rolling my eyes. And I never think I will be kicked to the ground and have to do push-ups.
But if you really believe such denigration is a (the only?) way up and out, well maybe you would show the right number of teeth, and slap your co-worker as hard as possible.
Clearly the camera is not a candid spy here. People are very aware of its presence. Painfully so at times. Thus I'm hesitant to paint with too broad a brush. People may have more dignity than fits in high-definition clips.
The movie moves with force, and Dan Deacon's soundtrack certainly helps. Turn it off at times and watch, it's quite a different experience. My son and his class are going to watch Koyaanisqatsi too. The films while different share a sort of vibe and approach, dare I say Deacon's soundtrack is more expansive than Glass's?
Some of the drone shots made me think that while an eagle can see a lot from so high, it cannot eat.
Anyways, I will seek out other films from Kingdon, and finish her Tribeca Q&A bonus on this disc, I had to pause that to not have it tell me what I thought about the movie. Thought reform comes in many ways and waves.
Two long shot connections.
First, watching the water park and some other dense scenes eerily reminded me of "Mad God." Which if you want an over-the-top look at mass mulch mankind merchandising, and in often gruesome stop-animation no less, you might want to check out.
Secondly, at times I found myself thinking about the Westworld HBO series. Well, the first season or two, in part due to the effectiveness in Deacon's score. It makes me sad actually, as I need to believe in a little dignity for all people, on all parts of the globe.
My last thought in watching the people on character throwing themselves so into their dream/duties, is that China may not just out-number the USA, but beat us at some of our dangerous delusions.
And yes, I know the USA has long fed its excesses off of China, from container ships and fentanyl caravans. I hope the USA does not return that dubious favor.
Documentary nominated for the Oscar 2022 directed by Jessica Kingdon, an American of Chinese origin.
The film differs from many recent documentaries in that it doesn't have those interviews with people sitting there looking at the camera, nor does it have a narrator to drive the story. The director's camera only observes, sometimes from afar, sometimes up close, the daily lives of workers in the poignant Chinese economy.
In the name of productivity, anything goes, especially the exploitation of workers. It is almost incomprehensible to me to see a recruitment of workers by major Chinese industries stating that the work can be done sitting down or that no health examination is required to enter. Others shout that the work is done 100% standing, demand maximum height of the worker, that workers will sleep in rooms with up to eight people in the same room, or hear that whoever decides if the duration the worker worked that day is their boss.
Perhaps because of her origins, in the end, the director tries to glamorize the toughness she showed, putting on the screen moments of relaxation of hundreds of Chinese in a water park, as if she wanted to convey the message: "work without limits pays".
As there are almost no lines, and when there are, they are dialogues between the workers, with long scenes, the documentary gets monotonous from the middle.
Anyway, it was valid to know the reality of Chinese workers.
The film differs from many recent documentaries in that it doesn't have those interviews with people sitting there looking at the camera, nor does it have a narrator to drive the story. The director's camera only observes, sometimes from afar, sometimes up close, the daily lives of workers in the poignant Chinese economy.
In the name of productivity, anything goes, especially the exploitation of workers. It is almost incomprehensible to me to see a recruitment of workers by major Chinese industries stating that the work can be done sitting down or that no health examination is required to enter. Others shout that the work is done 100% standing, demand maximum height of the worker, that workers will sleep in rooms with up to eight people in the same room, or hear that whoever decides if the duration the worker worked that day is their boss.
Perhaps because of her origins, in the end, the director tries to glamorize the toughness she showed, putting on the screen moments of relaxation of hundreds of Chinese in a water park, as if she wanted to convey the message: "work without limits pays".
As there are almost no lines, and when there are, they are dialogues between the workers, with long scenes, the documentary gets monotonous from the middle.
Anyway, it was valid to know the reality of Chinese workers.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsFeatured in La 94e cérémonie des Oscars (2022)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Ascension?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 17 200 $US
- Montant brut mondial
- 17 200 $US
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Ascension (2021) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre