Notre planète a ses limites: L'alerte de la science
Titre original : Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet
NOTE IMDb
7,7/10
3,5 k
MA NOTE
Il raconte l'histoire de la découverte scientifique la plus importante de notre époque, selon laquelle l'humanité a repoussé les limites qui ont permis à la Terre de préserver sa stabilité p... Tout lireIl raconte l'histoire de la découverte scientifique la plus importante de notre époque, selon laquelle l'humanité a repoussé les limites qui ont permis à la Terre de préserver sa stabilité pendant 10 000 ans, depuis l'aube de la civilisation.Il raconte l'histoire de la découverte scientifique la plus importante de notre époque, selon laquelle l'humanité a repoussé les limites qui ont permis à la Terre de préserver sa stabilité pendant 10 000 ans, depuis l'aube de la civilisation.
Photos
Elena Bennett
- Self - McGill University, Montréal
- (as Prof. Elena Bennett)
Jason Box
- Self - Geological Survey of Denmark & Greenland
- (as Prof. Jason Box)
Terry Hughes
- Self - Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
- (as Prof. Terry Hughes)
Anne Larigauderie
- Self - Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- (as Prof. Anne Larigauderie)
María Neira
- Self - World Health Organisation
- (as Dr. María Neira)
Carlos Nobre
- Self - Institute of Advanced Studies University of Säo Paulo
- (as Prof. Carlos Nobre)
Daniella Teixeira
- Self - Environmentalist at University of Queensland
- (as Dr. Daniella Teixeira)
Greta Thunberg
- Self - Environment Activist
- (images d'archives)
Ricarda Winkelmann
- Self - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
- (as Prof. Ricarda Winkelmann)
Avis à la une
10aerkiner
This is years of research, science-backed information being shared about what has happened due to current normalized daily practices and what will happen if we continue the same way without changing our approach of how we live on plant earth. We all have to take action now!
It's easy to see how humans are responsible for the devastation done to the environment. Industrialists and the governing bodies of every country are 100% responsible for this. It's the end. I'll be gone, and you may be gone, but the future of humanity is without doubt going to be filled with strife, and probably extinction of 99.9% of life on the planet. No one cared, so no one will live. It's the apocalypse, and you are all here to witness.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
A great flood is coming after fires that burn the planet. Wild stuff.
It is a very good documentary for sure. Everyone must understand that it is not just a small problem, but we are facing a global environmental crisis and we do not have 30-50 years more to start changing status quo of destroying everything around us. What was missed is the way how everyone can make an impact right away, without waiting for politicians to finally act. We need to adopt a fully plant-based diet to stop killing billions of animals each year, stop polluting rivers and oceans with cows' and pigs' manure, stop cutting forests so we could eat "less beef". We do not have time anymore for "less meat" and "flexitarian" nonsense. Our planet is dying, and we have mounting evidence that the plant-based diet is the best way how every single person can make the change. And yeah, side effect include better health, normal weight and a great feeling that you are not paying someone to keep living beings in terrible conditions with a brutal slaughter at the end of their short life so you could eat a steak for lunch.
David Attenborough is a hopeless optimist and in connection with the concept of Planetary Boundaries this gets to a point where it becomes nearly comical.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
Dear filmmakers everywhere: it is a good thing you attempt to do by explaining the sorry state of the planet but you all miss the key problem and solution. People are not going to change their behavior or expectations. They aren't going to give up their electronics or other creature comforts. So what is the problem really? It is people. There are too many of us on this planet now and it isn't sustainable. More people are coming so if we don't name the problem, how can we ever fix it? Overpopulation is the entire problem and reducing population is the only solution. Why is it so hard for people to see that?
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferences Mad Max (1979)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 13 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Notre planète a ses limites: L'alerte de la science (2021) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Répondre