Parallel
- 2024
- 1h 28min
NOTE IMDb
5,3/10
2,1 k
MA NOTE
Le parcours de Vanessa, une femme en deuil qui se retrouve mystérieusement à naviguer entre des espaces parallèles.Le parcours de Vanessa, une femme en deuil qui se retrouve mystérieusement à naviguer entre des espaces parallèles.Le parcours de Vanessa, une femme en deuil qui se retrouve mystérieusement à naviguer entre des espaces parallèles.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
Initially skeptical after seeing its unimpressive ratings, I reluctantly decided to watch this multiverse/time travel film after browsing through several user reviews. To my surprise, the movie captivated me with its unique, almost claustrophobic atmosphere, confined to a minimalistic setting with just three characters. Despite its apparent simplicity and limited scope, the film impressively explores its concept, pushing the boundaries of its narrative constraints.
It maintains a delicate balance between innovation and budget constraints, and I found myself wondering if its success was a stroke of luck or a testament to clever filmmaking. Unlike many avant-garde films that tend to meander and conclude on an unsatisfying note, this one managed to weave depth and intrigue throughout, compelling me to invest emotionally in all three protagonists-and their various iterations.
Given the complexity and the slow-burn nature of its storytelling, this movie might not resonate with everyone. It demands the right mood and moment-perhaps catching you in the perfect universe on the perfect evening, as it did with me. That night, I felt rewarded for my patience and was glad to see a film that didn't squander its potential. The industry's standard might hover around mediocrity, but this film stands out, deserving of much more than its initial 4.9 rating. Ultimately, I found myself struggling between 6 and 7 stars, but decided for a 7, appreciative of the heart, thoughts and risk invested by its creators, which set it apart from the pack. In a landscape where genuine innovation is rare, this film is a noteworthy exception.
It maintains a delicate balance between innovation and budget constraints, and I found myself wondering if its success was a stroke of luck or a testament to clever filmmaking. Unlike many avant-garde films that tend to meander and conclude on an unsatisfying note, this one managed to weave depth and intrigue throughout, compelling me to invest emotionally in all three protagonists-and their various iterations.
Given the complexity and the slow-burn nature of its storytelling, this movie might not resonate with everyone. It demands the right mood and moment-perhaps catching you in the perfect universe on the perfect evening, as it did with me. That night, I felt rewarded for my patience and was glad to see a film that didn't squander its potential. The industry's standard might hover around mediocrity, but this film stands out, deserving of much more than its initial 4.9 rating. Ultimately, I found myself struggling between 6 and 7 stars, but decided for a 7, appreciative of the heart, thoughts and risk invested by its creators, which set it apart from the pack. In a landscape where genuine innovation is rare, this film is a noteworthy exception.
And, yes I'm going to tell right away - you can actually understand dialogue. Sound is clear, crisp and easily understood. No noise volume wars in this movie.
Cast is small, plot is simple, some things are a bit generic but it works. It's shot competently.
I'd wager this is a pretty small budget movie. But for what it does, it uses that budget smartly.
I don't like the cumulative score this movie has here. I don't understand it. It is not a bad movie. Yes, it's microbudgeted, small cast, not bombastic and the plot is pretty straightforward. Maybe people got bored during it, who knows.
In any case, I liked it.
Cast is small, plot is simple, some things are a bit generic but it works. It's shot competently.
I'd wager this is a pretty small budget movie. But for what it does, it uses that budget smartly.
I don't like the cumulative score this movie has here. I don't understand it. It is not a bad movie. Yes, it's microbudgeted, small cast, not bombastic and the plot is pretty straightforward. Maybe people got bored during it, who knows.
In any case, I liked it.
Parallel depicts a woman, her husband, and his brother at ther late father's house deep in the woods. There is mention of the father's "crazy conspiracy theories" in their secluded area. The three appear to have some tension or conflict between them, especially the husband and wife. To escape this, thr wife goes for a walk into the woods and sees herself with a rifle, and this person shoots at her. The wife displays more emotional unsteadiness following this encounter.
That acting is well crafted if a bit overly emotive, but they are coping with a recent distressful situation. And the confusion of parallel worlds would be distressing as well. Production is good providing for a well-crafted visual prevention of home and woods.
But, the plot of loss, grief, and misery was too overwhelming for the seriousness of parallel worlds, and the sci-fi aspect complicated the sense of grief and loss without it adding anything to the film.
That acting is well crafted if a bit overly emotive, but they are coping with a recent distressful situation. And the confusion of parallel worlds would be distressing as well. Production is good providing for a well-crafted visual prevention of home and woods.
But, the plot of loss, grief, and misery was too overwhelming for the seriousness of parallel worlds, and the sci-fi aspect complicated the sense of grief and loss without it adding anything to the film.
I was sceptical when I jumped in after watching the previous one of the same name. You the one with two lovers on the bed one goes out and comes back with new mojo.
Also the fact that it's brown ppl on a limited budget.
Well the film really had me interested & my attention captivated.
The lowdown here was lack of resources , in terms of fx in the bushes houses & small details.
As it all depends on the cast for us to realise there is change, my point being it can't be only the ppl with alternations , atleast have flowers , paint etc.
Don't get me wrong they nailed it with what was available.
The story swayed away from the quantum entanglement , which would have been too much for low budget & that worked well.
Dialogue wise, yeah it was mid , not too cringe but cheesy - not bad for something that really worked towards making a time travel, quantum realms etc kind of genre easy for simpletons and not to simple to make you feel like what's the point.
I enjoyed that our main character gets to view the world from a double standard perspective & eventually end up understanding that no one is in control but what she was told in the fire place is actually true.
The ending is also thought provocative to build a cult classic .
Also the fact that it's brown ppl on a limited budget.
Well the film really had me interested & my attention captivated.
The lowdown here was lack of resources , in terms of fx in the bushes houses & small details.
As it all depends on the cast for us to realise there is change, my point being it can't be only the ppl with alternations , atleast have flowers , paint etc.
Don't get me wrong they nailed it with what was available.
The story swayed away from the quantum entanglement , which would have been too much for low budget & that worked well.
Dialogue wise, yeah it was mid , not too cringe but cheesy - not bad for something that really worked towards making a time travel, quantum realms etc kind of genre easy for simpletons and not to simple to make you feel like what's the point.
I enjoyed that our main character gets to view the world from a double standard perspective & eventually end up understanding that no one is in control but what she was told in the fire place is actually true.
The ending is also thought provocative to build a cult classic .
Yeah I really don't understand why the current rating is below 5.
Its a solid low budget sci-fi movie.
Yes, it took like 30 minutes to get going but after that it's a smooth sailing with drama, twists and all of that.
Cast is amazing. Which is no surprise considering all of the previous work of Aldis Hodge and Danielle Deadwyler.
Edwin Hodge also was a nice surprise, cause I only remember him in them Purge movies but he did a solid job here.
Yes, the other review is correct compering Parallel to Coherence sinse they both share a pretty similar premise. Although I gotta say that I found this one a little more tidy. Plus, again, the cast here is superb.
Anyway, give this movie a chance.
Its a solid low budget sci-fi movie.
Yes, it took like 30 minutes to get going but after that it's a smooth sailing with drama, twists and all of that.
Cast is amazing. Which is no surprise considering all of the previous work of Aldis Hodge and Danielle Deadwyler.
Edwin Hodge also was a nice surprise, cause I only remember him in them Purge movies but he did a solid job here.
Yes, the other review is correct compering Parallel to Coherence sinse they both share a pretty similar premise. Although I gotta say that I found this one a little more tidy. Plus, again, the cast here is superb.
Anyway, give this movie a chance.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film co-stars real life brothers Aldis & Edwin Hodge playing brothers.
- GaffesWhen Vanessa leaves the parallel house for the first time, she leaves without her rifle, but then when she gets to the tree, it's back on her shoulder.
- ConnexionsRemake of Parallel Forest (2020)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Parallel?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 28 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant