NOTE IMDb
5,2/10
15 k
MA NOTE
Jake, un milliardaire de la technologie, réunit ses amis dans sa propriété de Miami pour une partie de poker à fort enjeu. Il a concocté un plan élaboré destiné à leur rendre une certaine ju... Tout lireJake, un milliardaire de la technologie, réunit ses amis dans sa propriété de Miami pour une partie de poker à fort enjeu. Il a concocté un plan élaboré destiné à leur rendre une certaine justice.Jake, un milliardaire de la technologie, réunit ses amis dans sa propriété de Miami pour une partie de poker à fort enjeu. Il a concocté un plan élaboré destiné à leur rendre une certaine justice.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Russell Crowe plays a billionaire who has to confront his own mortality, so he does it in a very billionaire-ish manner. Only problem is his plans are interrupted by art thieves...
It's well filmed and almost worth watching for the scenery and camera work alone. The real issue with Poker Face is that it wants to be too many things and doesn't succeed in any special way at any of them. It's not much of a drama about life and mortality, though it is a little bit; it's not much of a thriller though there's some crime and betrayal; Action? Forget it (though it does try to tease at it with fast cars and a few guns).
It's basically a boyhood to adult buddy film with lots of cash thrown at it. It's okay, you probably won't feel bad for watching it, but you won't be telling many people about it either.
It's well filmed and almost worth watching for the scenery and camera work alone. The real issue with Poker Face is that it wants to be too many things and doesn't succeed in any special way at any of them. It's not much of a drama about life and mortality, though it is a little bit; it's not much of a thriller though there's some crime and betrayal; Action? Forget it (though it does try to tease at it with fast cars and a few guns).
It's basically a boyhood to adult buddy film with lots of cash thrown at it. It's okay, you probably won't feel bad for watching it, but you won't be telling many people about it either.
I think this movie is being absolutely torn to shreds where it probably doesn't deserve that much backlash.
Is it amazing? No. But I didn't finish watching it with a sour taste in my mouth. It was alright.
The Australian shots are spectacular in some scenes, I particularly enjoyed the architecture and homes/apartments that were showcased. Russell Crowe's acting was good, I thought he fit the character well enough and the last 30-60 minutes where the action occurred was actually pretty good.
All of the other characters did have problems being understood and became irrelevant. I was excited to see Liam Hemsworth but became really confused why he was cast as a guy in his late 50s? It just didn't make sense at all. Also the first half of the movie is pretty slow and doesn't really go anywhere.
Overall it's okay to watch.
Is it amazing? No. But I didn't finish watching it with a sour taste in my mouth. It was alright.
The Australian shots are spectacular in some scenes, I particularly enjoyed the architecture and homes/apartments that were showcased. Russell Crowe's acting was good, I thought he fit the character well enough and the last 30-60 minutes where the action occurred was actually pretty good.
All of the other characters did have problems being understood and became irrelevant. I was excited to see Liam Hemsworth but became really confused why he was cast as a guy in his late 50s? It just didn't make sense at all. Also the first half of the movie is pretty slow and doesn't really go anywhere.
Overall it's okay to watch.
Russel Crowe directed this action thriller drama and it was a decent attempt. However, it falls short of the expectations we have from him as an actor at least. His acting also took a dip perhaps due to directorial burden as he was not at his usual best. Movie started off as a fairly good premise and it started to build on the characters but then the plot got very muddled up with too many things going on simultaneously towards the later half. Revenge plot alone could have developed it into a reasonable movie on its own but the addition of the thugs angle made it neither here nor there. Overall a good one time watch and I rate it as 6/10.
It's okay, but took way too long to get going.
This film is just okay, nothing spectacular and it's very low-key. The acting performances are good enough.
Briefly outlining the plot, it's about a man with cancer who gives money to his friends and family and his house gets invaded and people want to steal his art.
There's not much to the plot at all, this 90 minute film could easily be condensed into 20 minutes and not much of the plot would've been lost at all.
The first 30 minutes are a chore to get through, far too slow to show far too little. Additionally, that first third of the film is very very exposition heavy.
Hemsworth is hardly even in the film so if you're watching for him, then I've got bad news.
Overall, just an okay film.
This film is just okay, nothing spectacular and it's very low-key. The acting performances are good enough.
Briefly outlining the plot, it's about a man with cancer who gives money to his friends and family and his house gets invaded and people want to steal his art.
There's not much to the plot at all, this 90 minute film could easily be condensed into 20 minutes and not much of the plot would've been lost at all.
The first 30 minutes are a chore to get through, far too slow to show far too little. Additionally, that first third of the film is very very exposition heavy.
Hemsworth is hardly even in the film so if you're watching for him, then I've got bad news.
Overall, just an okay film.
The bad: this movie has got an artsy fartsy style to it, that was annoying me from the very start. Why? Because I hate it when a director starts using slowmotion photography flashbacks and supposedly spiritual monologues, that dont make sense whatsoever.
BEWARE: this is definitely NOT a straigthforward pokergame movie. Forget about it. Little to none action. Only a tiny bit of supsense.
SKIP the entire first hour. The (little bit) of suspense that there still is, can only be experienced after an entire first hour, wherein nothing much happens AT ALL, besides Russell Crowe looking deep and mysterious into the distance for ages on end and mumbling to himself about deep thoughts and feelings.
What the heck is this movie about?
Ruined by a director, who just doesnt know how to tell a solid story.
It only lasts 1 hour and 20 minutes. I guess they had to cut out a lot of scenes that dragged this movie down even more.
Bad editing. Cheap photography. Even cheaper and ridiculous dialogues. And the story? Pfff, really, this movie is disjointed from the very start.
Not entirely terrible, but definitely missing supsense, missing spark and punch and most of all missing a coherent storyline with credible characters.
Artsy fartsy flop. Sorry...I tried to like it, because I really dig Russell Crowe as an actor, but this time around he couldnt save this movie from failing...
BEWARE: this is definitely NOT a straigthforward pokergame movie. Forget about it. Little to none action. Only a tiny bit of supsense.
SKIP the entire first hour. The (little bit) of suspense that there still is, can only be experienced after an entire first hour, wherein nothing much happens AT ALL, besides Russell Crowe looking deep and mysterious into the distance for ages on end and mumbling to himself about deep thoughts and feelings.
What the heck is this movie about?
Ruined by a director, who just doesnt know how to tell a solid story.
It only lasts 1 hour and 20 minutes. I guess they had to cut out a lot of scenes that dragged this movie down even more.
Bad editing. Cheap photography. Even cheaper and ridiculous dialogues. And the story? Pfff, really, this movie is disjointed from the very start.
Not entirely terrible, but definitely missing supsense, missing spark and punch and most of all missing a coherent storyline with credible characters.
Artsy fartsy flop. Sorry...I tried to like it, because I really dig Russell Crowe as an actor, but this time around he couldnt save this movie from failing...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis movie stars Elsa Pataky and Liam Hemsworth. In real life, Liam is her brother-in-law: Elsa is married to Chris Hemsworth.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Projector: Poker Face (2022, Russell Crowe) (2022)
- Bandes originalesWe Will Always Be Together
Performed by Indoor Garden Party
Written by Russell Crowe, Scott Grimes
Vocals performed by Scott Grimes
Piano performed by Nick Marzock
Strings arranged by Mattias Bylund
Produced and Mixed by Carl Falk
Courtesy of Model 101 Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Poker Face?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Juego Perfecto
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 22 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 633 734 $US
- Durée
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant