NOTE IMDb
5,4/10
17 k
MA NOTE
Un animateur prend un appel, où un inconnu menace de tuer toute sa famille à l'antenne. Pour sauver ses proches, l'animateur radio devra jouer à un jeu de survie et le seul moyen de gagner e... Tout lireUn animateur prend un appel, où un inconnu menace de tuer toute sa famille à l'antenne. Pour sauver ses proches, l'animateur radio devra jouer à un jeu de survie et le seul moyen de gagner est de découvrir l'identité du criminel.Un animateur prend un appel, où un inconnu menace de tuer toute sa famille à l'antenne. Pour sauver ses proches, l'animateur radio devra jouer à un jeu de survie et le seul moyen de gagner est de découvrir l'identité du criminel.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Alia Seror-O'Neill
- Mary
- (as Alia Seror O'Neill)
Nadia Farès
- Sam
- (as Nadia Fares)
Avis à la une
I probably wasn't planning to watch 'On the Line', however the synopsis sounded like my kind of movie and I realised it had been a long time since I'd seen Mel Gibson in anything. So I gave it a shot. Man, the energy in this one was wild.
The film is clunky, I'll start by saying. Gibson's acting is a class above everyone else. He's so natural on screen that it sort of brings everyone else down a peg, simply by comparison.
The movie gets into the action fairly quickly. In fact that is something I have to give praise to, is that the overall pacing is very good. Once things kick into gear it doesn't really relent.
So I was having a good time with this movie, wondering where it was all headed, when suddenly I felt like I got hit by a sledge hammer. I haven't been that caught off guard by a plot twist in a long time. I thought surely not. But yes, sure enough they went with it.
I found it almost impossible to dislike this film. Is it perfectly made, no. Is it as polished as other films, perhaps not. But is it more entertaining and bold than your average film, absolutely. 7/10.
The film is clunky, I'll start by saying. Gibson's acting is a class above everyone else. He's so natural on screen that it sort of brings everyone else down a peg, simply by comparison.
The movie gets into the action fairly quickly. In fact that is something I have to give praise to, is that the overall pacing is very good. Once things kick into gear it doesn't really relent.
So I was having a good time with this movie, wondering where it was all headed, when suddenly I felt like I got hit by a sledge hammer. I haven't been that caught off guard by a plot twist in a long time. I thought surely not. But yes, sure enough they went with it.
I found it almost impossible to dislike this film. Is it perfectly made, no. Is it as polished as other films, perhaps not. But is it more entertaining and bold than your average film, absolutely. 7/10.
I'm not sure why there are so many negative reviews of this, as my wife and I (and she is hard to please) both really enjoyed this film.
Yes, there are plenty of riffs from other films, as you'd expect with this kind of storyline, but that's not unusual in any film, and there are plenty of unexpected twists and turns to keep you interested and the film was ended very well.
Gibson fell out of favour with filmmakers for too long and is now rebuilding his career in later life, and while he is a little hammy at times in this, and certainly takes cues from his Ransom performance, he is still a fine actor and he steers this film along nicely. All of the supporting cast, many relatively unknown, give solid performances, nothing too outstanding, but nothing terrible either.
Overall then, an enjoyable thriller with some cool twists that might surprise you. A solid watch.
Yes, there are plenty of riffs from other films, as you'd expect with this kind of storyline, but that's not unusual in any film, and there are plenty of unexpected twists and turns to keep you interested and the film was ended very well.
Gibson fell out of favour with filmmakers for too long and is now rebuilding his career in later life, and while he is a little hammy at times in this, and certainly takes cues from his Ransom performance, he is still a fine actor and he steers this film along nicely. All of the supporting cast, many relatively unknown, give solid performances, nothing too outstanding, but nothing terrible either.
Overall then, an enjoyable thriller with some cool twists that might surprise you. A solid watch.
On the line was a very... interesting movie, the concept is fascinating and that was enough for me to give it a watch. Whilst the acting was decent for the most part, some parts that were intended to be serious made me laugh but that was only once or twice. However the ending was shallow- I get why its like that but I'm not sure why they actually went with it. Time absolutely flew whilst I was watching it though and it kept me on the edge of my seat and that's all I can really ask of a thriller. I'm not sure what but something just kept me watching, was it the concept? Was it the characters? I cant say for sure but what I can say is that its a hit or miss film.
A little Die Hard, some The Game, and some good old Mel Gibson fun. While On the Line isn't the greatest movie, it held my interest with non-stop suspense. It is a real nail-biter until you realize what is really happening. Mel does a great job of playing Elvis the Talk-show host, and delivers a good believable portrayal of a man on the edge. The story gets moving very early on and builds to a crescendo that might be a bit too predictable. But still very entertaining. It's good to see Mel Gibson in a decent role again, and while this movie wasn't a Lethal Weapon or a Braveheart it was a pretty decent movie.
Very enjoyable entertainment, good twists and a fabulous Mel Gibson. No masterpiece but a nice flick!
Don't understand the bad reviews.
In my book it's all about managing expectations. If you choose a movie because the plot line interests you, you like the cast and you're in for a relaxing few hours in front of the telly then you're rarely disappointed.
Although if you are a movie Connaisseur or critic, you might want to apply different criteria to pick your movies to avoid disappointment.
In this case it did what it said on the tin and provided very enjoyable light entertainment, a good portion of suspense and a good ending.
Don't understand the bad reviews.
In my book it's all about managing expectations. If you choose a movie because the plot line interests you, you like the cast and you're in for a relaxing few hours in front of the telly then you're rarely disappointed.
Although if you are a movie Connaisseur or critic, you might want to apply different criteria to pick your movies to avoid disappointment.
In this case it did what it said on the tin and provided very enjoyable light entertainment, a good portion of suspense and a good ending.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesKevin Connolly was supposed to play Justin, but due to his first child arriving soon he recommended Kevin Dillon who got the role.
- Gaffes(at around 1h 3 mins) Right before Elvis finds Justin's body, a pair of reading glasses hang from his collar. A few shots later, they're gone.
- Citations
Elvis Cooney: What kind of a B grade movie is this?
- ConnexionsReferenced in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Qatar World Cup (2022)
- Bandes originalesCan't Stop
Written by Flea (as Michael Balzary), John Frusciante, Anthony Kiedis, Chad Smith
Performed by Red Hot Chili Peppers (uncredited)
©Universal Music Publishing on behalf of Moebetoblame Music
(P)2002 Warner Records Inc. for the U.S. and Wea International Inc. for the world outside of the U.S.
With the permission of Universal Music Publishing Film & TV & Warner Music France
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is On the Line?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 112 081 $US
- Durée1 heure 44 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was On the Line (2022) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Répondre