NOTE IMDb
6,1/10
5,2 k
MA NOTE
Une jeune orpheline de 18 ans, mourante, veut se rendre en Europe pour retrouver sa mère biologique. Lorsqu'elle rencontre un jeune homme au grand cœur, rongé par la culpabilité d'un acciden... Tout lireUne jeune orpheline de 18 ans, mourante, veut se rendre en Europe pour retrouver sa mère biologique. Lorsqu'elle rencontre un jeune homme au grand cœur, rongé par la culpabilité d'un accident mortel, elle le convainc de l'accompagner.Une jeune orpheline de 18 ans, mourante, veut se rendre en Europe pour retrouver sa mère biologique. Lorsqu'elle rencontre un jeune homme au grand cœur, rongé par la culpabilité d'un accident mortel, elle le convainc de l'accompagner.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Davinia Morales
- Mom
- (générique uniquement)
Avis à la une
Two strangers: Mia, an orphaned girl, and Kyle, a boy reeling from the guilt of a fatal accident, hit the road to find Mia's biological mother. The characters are likeable, their journey is all fun and the Spanish scenery is just beautiful. The story is emotional and a little bit of a tearjerker, too.
Unlike recent YA movies (After, Through My Window, Beautiful Disaster, My Fault), this one is not centered on fighting & sex scenes; instead, it gives off the vibes of good old romances about young love from several years ago. It's the right choice if you want to watch something sweet & cute at the weekend or on a Friday night.
Unlike recent YA movies (After, Through My Window, Beautiful Disaster, My Fault), this one is not centered on fighting & sex scenes; instead, it gives off the vibes of good old romances about young love from several years ago. It's the right choice if you want to watch something sweet & cute at the weekend or on a Friday night.
First of all, I must say that the movie was good, especially for this era where emotions have faded. It can bring the power of love back to the screen. It's true that the movie was cliché, but as we all know, films with clichéd themes can still have a significant impact if well executed. Especially in a world that needs these kinds of films to remind people of the strength of love. Just like there were issues in the movie, I don't have a problem with its clichéd nature. However, the director and the writer could have added depth to the emotions in many places with some changes. The cinematographer could have captured the depth of emotions more effectively in many emotional scenes through skilled camera movement, and at least prevent the cinematography from being too clichéd. The writer could have crafted stronger dialogues, especially during the climax of the film. Personally, I would rate the cinematography a 6 out of 10, the dialogues a 5 out of 10, and overall, I would give the film a rating of 5 to 5.2 for its effort in portraying love.
The lead actress carried this film. The boy was good too in an understated way. But she exuded a rare freshness.
I like the idea that two wounded souls with a connection help each other while on a mission.
I always come back to the same criticism. Lack of character development. Who is the boy? He has white parents and seems to be of some sort of mixed background. That's odd casting without an explanation.
The girl still calls her foster mother "Mrs." after a decade? The kids are the same age and are from a relatively small area, Yet they have never seen each other?
I get the idea of her needing a driver, but I don't believe that she would camp with someone she didn't even know.
I do respect that there was a scene when the boy breaks down with emotion. That is often missing in emotional films where one character never takes their guard down.
It has a lovely theme of healing, and the power of human connection, with beautiful scenery and a good twist.
Part of what sells it is the use of unknown performers. That makes it seem more real.
I like the idea that two wounded souls with a connection help each other while on a mission.
I always come back to the same criticism. Lack of character development. Who is the boy? He has white parents and seems to be of some sort of mixed background. That's odd casting without an explanation.
The girl still calls her foster mother "Mrs." after a decade? The kids are the same age and are from a relatively small area, Yet they have never seen each other?
I get the idea of her needing a driver, but I don't believe that she would camp with someone she didn't even know.
I do respect that there was a scene when the boy breaks down with emotion. That is often missing in emotional films where one character never takes their guard down.
It has a lovely theme of healing, and the power of human connection, with beautiful scenery and a good twist.
Part of what sells it is the use of unknown performers. That makes it seem more real.
It is clear to me that this story contains much more than what appears on the surface. It gives me the feeling that its creator and writer is someone with a sensitivity and talent that has yet to be discovered and honored in cinema. Since her novel in which this film is inspired is working so well and has a depth and dimension I rarely find in others... I'm really looking forward to seeing her next works. I enjoyed watching See you on Venus and loved the charisma and tenderness Virginia Gardner brings to her character, cause is close to Mía from the book. Thanks for creating such a lovely story.
Acting is pretty atrocious from almost every character. Everything is stiff, the music is predictably cheesy and immature, like the background of a barney episode.
Script is predictable, cliche, and well, dorky.
It seems like an AI wrote this script.
All the scenes seem really rushed, like this was a first time director just trying things out for the first time, and wanting to get everything done in one take.
Seriously, you could guess the next line of each character. That's how predictable everything is. Here's the part what they cry, here's the loving father son moment, etc.
Don't waste you time. There are much better movies in this genre.
Script is predictable, cliche, and well, dorky.
It seems like an AI wrote this script.
All the scenes seem really rushed, like this was a first time director just trying things out for the first time, and wanting to get everything done in one take.
Seriously, you could guess the next line of each character. That's how predictable everything is. Here's the part what they cry, here's the loving father son moment, etc.
Don't waste you time. There are much better movies in this genre.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesVirginia Gardner and Rob Estes were also in Beautiful Disaster together and will be in Beautiful Wedding together too
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is See You on Venus?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Hẹn Nhau Trên Sao Kim
- Lieux de tournage
- Segovia, Castilla y León, Espagne(Location)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 170 930 $US
- Durée
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant