Shelby Oaks
- 2024
- 12 avec avertissement
- 1h 31min
La recherche désespérée d'une femme pour sa soeur perdue depuis longtemps tombe dans l'obsession lorsqu'elle réalise que le démon imaginaire de leur enfance était peut-être réel.La recherche désespérée d'une femme pour sa soeur perdue depuis longtemps tombe dans l'obsession lorsqu'elle réalise que le démon imaginaire de leur enfance était peut-être réel.La recherche désespérée d'une femme pour sa soeur perdue depuis longtemps tombe dans l'obsession lorsqu'elle réalise que le démon imaginaire de leur enfance était peut-être réel.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
Sloane Burkett
- Young Riley
- (as Sloane Harlow Burkett)
5,57.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis à la une
Generic and contrived
Dark forest? Check.
Baby in danger? Check.
News footage? Check. VHS analog quality footage? Check.
Abandoned building? Attic scene? Check. Check.
Sidenote: what is with all these modern movies that have the "cable TV" "American Horror Story/Walking Dead"-esque title sequences? So offputting and unnecessary.
Baby in danger? Check.
News footage? Check. VHS analog quality footage? Check.
Abandoned building? Attic scene? Check. Check.
Sidenote: what is with all these modern movies that have the "cable TV" "American Horror Story/Walking Dead"-esque title sequences? So offputting and unnecessary.
Horror Trop
A film made to be watched at home. Many dark moments that allowed for the theater guide lighting to wash out the screen. Slow start that take found footage and then turns into a mystery movie only to end with a boring twist and unsatisfying ending. The only real thing that could save this movie is if the home video sleuths are able to frame by frame hidden clues throughout the film otherwise, don't waste your time. C horror film.
Oh the irony
The irony here of a movie "critic" Writing and directing a movie this bad cannot be lost on him.
Boring doesn't even begin to describe the experience of watching... tolerating this vanity project.
The static camera in every scenes, I don't know how big the camera was that they used I'm pretty sure it would pan a room.
The dialogue is generic and cliched, you've heard every line from this "movie" before.
There are no scares or chills and the "monster" is so unimaginative it's almost laughable.
It gets a 3 stars because it did one thing I liked, it didn't use jump scare sound effects where you expect them.
Boring doesn't even begin to describe the experience of watching... tolerating this vanity project.
The static camera in every scenes, I don't know how big the camera was that they used I'm pretty sure it would pan a room.
The dialogue is generic and cliched, you've heard every line from this "movie" before.
There are no scares or chills and the "monster" is so unimaginative it's almost laughable.
It gets a 3 stars because it did one thing I liked, it didn't use jump scare sound effects where you expect them.
Ambitious but disappointing
Now before I begin, I want to say I enjoyed Chris Stuckmann's critic videos and works in the past. Having seen his reviews and talks about his upbringings in the vile Jehovah Witnesses cult was interesting. He seems like a chill person. Now for his first debut feature film, there are some good aspects, yet also not so great aspects.
Starters, the atmosphere and presentation is pretty good. With the tones of supernatural, mystery, found footage style and blended with paranoia themes, it helps add layers of tension within the setting and concept. Alongside with some solid special effects, production designs and camera work, there are some genuinely good moments of creepy sequences, atmospheres within the setting, and the colors too. Stuckmann's direction is decent, as he was able to capture the essence of the themes and balances pretty well. Alright admittedly, there are some direction chops that didn't land very well.
The performances are pretty solid. Camille Sullivan was really good, alongside with the rest of the cast members too. Unfortunately, the writing and execution causes the movie to prevent it from being good. First of all, the story and concept is good and the writing does offer some unique and fun horror ideas. But the issues is that it feels like Stuckmann struggles to blend the writing perfectly with what he wants to present. Because of that, the writing demonstrates a lot of horror cliches that are predictable and moments that feel messy. Which makes the characters of the movie hard to believe in nor engage.
Alongside with some annoying jump scares, the dialogue does feel wonky. As if the dialogue feels like something of a student film project does. On the effects, there are some good animal and blood effects, including sound designs. And the pacing is pretty solid.
At the end, I'm happy Chris Stuckmann is able to finally make his movie. He has talent for sure and I do like to see where he leads next. But, he really needs to get a better writer.
Starters, the atmosphere and presentation is pretty good. With the tones of supernatural, mystery, found footage style and blended with paranoia themes, it helps add layers of tension within the setting and concept. Alongside with some solid special effects, production designs and camera work, there are some genuinely good moments of creepy sequences, atmospheres within the setting, and the colors too. Stuckmann's direction is decent, as he was able to capture the essence of the themes and balances pretty well. Alright admittedly, there are some direction chops that didn't land very well.
The performances are pretty solid. Camille Sullivan was really good, alongside with the rest of the cast members too. Unfortunately, the writing and execution causes the movie to prevent it from being good. First of all, the story and concept is good and the writing does offer some unique and fun horror ideas. But the issues is that it feels like Stuckmann struggles to blend the writing perfectly with what he wants to present. Because of that, the writing demonstrates a lot of horror cliches that are predictable and moments that feel messy. Which makes the characters of the movie hard to believe in nor engage.
Alongside with some annoying jump scares, the dialogue does feel wonky. As if the dialogue feels like something of a student film project does. On the effects, there are some good animal and blood effects, including sound designs. And the pacing is pretty solid.
At the end, I'm happy Chris Stuckmann is able to finally make his movie. He has talent for sure and I do like to see where he leads next. But, he really needs to get a better writer.
Seen this formula in a different light before.
High hopes dashes away midway through film. It started off with a uniquely fresh approach to telling the story, but fell into the cliche of brave person falling in the trappings of a common horror movie. There's a lot of scenes that made no sense that the only conclusion is exactly how most horror films with a supernatural villain ends. The protagonist's conviction after 12 years has finally waned when presented a means to her true desire - succumbs to temptation. A solid 7 for the unique, ala dateline NBC news segment style film intro. 7 for the good actors. An awful 1 score for the predictable ending which diluted the effectiveness of the scare score of 3. See it if you dare sit through another frustratingly cliche horror film.
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Sinister sequels, eerie indies, and blockbuster boo-fests — here are the most exciting horror movies and shows to add to your Watchlist.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Kickstarter campaign for this film reached its initial funding goal of $250,000 within 24 hours. The initial stretchgoals (up to $600,000) were reached with 1,5 weeks of the campaign remaining, which prompted in the addition of further stretchgoals (up to $1,000,000) - which were also reached before the end of the campaign. When the campaign finished after one month, a total sum of $1,390,845 was pledged by 14,720 supporters - making it the most funded horror film on Kickstarter.
- Crédits fousThe opening credits don't start rolling until the 17-minute mark.
- Bandes originales'The Paranormal Paranoids' Theme
Written and Performed by Aaron J. Morton
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Shelby Oaks?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Terror en Shelby Oaks
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 400 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 4 500 051 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 346 918 $US
- 26 oct. 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 6 051 389 $US
- Durée
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant








