Resurrected
- 2023
- 1h 37min
NOTE IMDb
5,3/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Dans un futur dystopique, le Vatican sait comment ressusciter les gens. Un prêtre découvre une conspiration derrière ces résurrections et leur lien possible avec une série de meurtres.Dans un futur dystopique, le Vatican sait comment ressusciter les gens. Un prêtre découvre une conspiration derrière ces résurrections et leur lien possible avec une série de meurtres.Dans un futur dystopique, le Vatican sait comment ressusciter les gens. Un prêtre découvre une conspiration derrière ces résurrections et leur lien possible avec une série de meurtres.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Michael Villar
- Frank Collins
- (as Michael Javier Villar)
Maryna Bennett
- Rose Patterson
- (as a different name)
Ahmed Mawas
- Sayid Aboud
- (as Ahmed El-Mawas)
Carolyn Alise
- Anna
- (as Carolyn A'Lise)
Avis à la une
No, it's not revolutionary or even 'good', but it IS okay if found footage is your thing and you've run out. The premise is actually interesting, it would make a good big budget movie/or a series! (maybe there is already one, maybe I've missed it?)
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
I really enjoyed this.
The whole film takes place in the digital sphere...from facetime calls, to webcam chats, and even the metaverse.
With the plot revolving around the Vatican discovering how to resurrect people.
Not clone them...but actually resurrect them...with their memories of dying intact.
Hence, we find ourselves following things from the perspective of the father of the first resurrectee.
A young child that was killed in a car crash, with his father at the helm.
The father survives the ordeal, but his son does not.
Leading the boy's mother to cut him off from contact with his son, after the Vatican steps in to resurrect the boy.
An act which makes them both celebrities, of sorts.
The father, as a newly ordained Catholic priest, who is tasked with counseling new resurrectees- so as to help them readjust to life back on Earth.
And the son, as the face (and spokesperson) of this new class of resurrectees.
However...things start to take a dark turn, when one of his parishioners kills a number of his co-workers in a workplace massacre.
One act, among a trend, that has been turning "One Lifers" against the "R. P.s", as mob mentality starts to set in, in wake of the killings.
Thus, the whole thing ends up being a reflection of the philosophical debate surrounding the potential threats that advancements in the world of AI might bring about.
Spun in with speculation that those murdered by the RPs, will, themselves, be resurrected...only to act in the same manner.
Therefore creating a cascade effect, akin to a zombie apocalypse.
Which makes the film a sort of combination between Caviar and Infinity Pool (to compare it to other recent horror films, from this year).
Or, at least, a middle ground, between the two.
Which is actually pretty clever, if you think about it.
Because this film is, interestingly, oriented around a similar- yet, opposite- philosophical conundrum, compared to the one we find in Brandon Cronenberg's Infinity Pool.
In that, like in Cronenberg's film, death becomes meaningless.
Only, here, we are presented with a situation where, if the death of another no longer has philosophical meaning, what stops those who have lived through such an ordeal, from acting out in a depraved manner, to put others through the same experience they have gone through.
So as to offer them perspective, on what it's like to be a resurrectee.
Which has the same effect as not having to answer for the capital crimes you've committed, like we see in Infinity Pool...only, in the opposite way.
The two actually quite compliment each other...as they form a sort of unity of opposites.
While, the whole thing spirals into a bizarre conspiracy, like we see in Caviar.
Albeit, one much more coherent than we see in that film.
Despite the fact that they share stylistic similarities.
In the end, considering what it is- in regards to it's plot structure, and general construction- it's impressively engaging.
Simple, yet effective.
Which goes to show just what you can do with a little imagination, some decent writing, and solid performances from the cast.
I admit, I found this to be quite a fresh and entertaining story.
Even though it's structure is rather simplistic.
So give it a shot.
Because it's definitely worth a watch.
5.5 out of 10.
The whole film takes place in the digital sphere...from facetime calls, to webcam chats, and even the metaverse.
With the plot revolving around the Vatican discovering how to resurrect people.
Not clone them...but actually resurrect them...with their memories of dying intact.
Hence, we find ourselves following things from the perspective of the father of the first resurrectee.
A young child that was killed in a car crash, with his father at the helm.
The father survives the ordeal, but his son does not.
Leading the boy's mother to cut him off from contact with his son, after the Vatican steps in to resurrect the boy.
An act which makes them both celebrities, of sorts.
The father, as a newly ordained Catholic priest, who is tasked with counseling new resurrectees- so as to help them readjust to life back on Earth.
And the son, as the face (and spokesperson) of this new class of resurrectees.
However...things start to take a dark turn, when one of his parishioners kills a number of his co-workers in a workplace massacre.
One act, among a trend, that has been turning "One Lifers" against the "R. P.s", as mob mentality starts to set in, in wake of the killings.
Thus, the whole thing ends up being a reflection of the philosophical debate surrounding the potential threats that advancements in the world of AI might bring about.
Spun in with speculation that those murdered by the RPs, will, themselves, be resurrected...only to act in the same manner.
Therefore creating a cascade effect, akin to a zombie apocalypse.
Which makes the film a sort of combination between Caviar and Infinity Pool (to compare it to other recent horror films, from this year).
Or, at least, a middle ground, between the two.
Which is actually pretty clever, if you think about it.
Because this film is, interestingly, oriented around a similar- yet, opposite- philosophical conundrum, compared to the one we find in Brandon Cronenberg's Infinity Pool.
In that, like in Cronenberg's film, death becomes meaningless.
Only, here, we are presented with a situation where, if the death of another no longer has philosophical meaning, what stops those who have lived through such an ordeal, from acting out in a depraved manner, to put others through the same experience they have gone through.
So as to offer them perspective, on what it's like to be a resurrectee.
Which has the same effect as not having to answer for the capital crimes you've committed, like we see in Infinity Pool...only, in the opposite way.
The two actually quite compliment each other...as they form a sort of unity of opposites.
While, the whole thing spirals into a bizarre conspiracy, like we see in Caviar.
Albeit, one much more coherent than we see in that film.
Despite the fact that they share stylistic similarities.
In the end, considering what it is- in regards to it's plot structure, and general construction- it's impressively engaging.
Simple, yet effective.
Which goes to show just what you can do with a little imagination, some decent writing, and solid performances from the cast.
I admit, I found this to be quite a fresh and entertaining story.
Even though it's structure is rather simplistic.
So give it a shot.
Because it's definitely worth a watch.
5.5 out of 10.
Is the acting the greatest? No. What makes this movie interesting is the story, the idea itself. That kind of saves the whole movie. It is an interesting story: resurrection... What would happen to the world, if we really could resurrect people... This movie made me think about that. How would people react to it? How would the world look like? And like the movie itself discusses too: Who would be entitled to it? So yes, I do think the movie is worth a watch for the story. And this new concept of making movies with online cameras/Facetime only, I find interesting too. This type of content becomes more popular. Seen worse. The acting isn't the greatest, but overall worth a watch if you find the storyline itself intriguing then you won't be too bored.
Yes, it is a webcam- and chat-based movie. Which makes me wonder how well packed it is with action, that keeps you edge-seated. One third of the time are action scenes, shot again on webcams of all kinds.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
The overall plot of this movie is quite absurd to say the least, but me and my partner had a lot of fun watching it because of it.
All the people who mentioned "bad acting" in their reviews must have been watching a completely different movie than me. The acting was really solid from all of the actors. It was far better than in most of such movies.
It was also fun seeing that the director wasn't afraid to make a movie that openly criticizes the Catholic church and the way that a lot of people perceive it, so as nothing more than a huge criminal organisation hiding in plain sight.
If you like the found footage genre, you'll definitely like this movie. My partner loves this genre and even she said that it's one of the best ones she ever watched!
All the people who mentioned "bad acting" in their reviews must have been watching a completely different movie than me. The acting was really solid from all of the actors. It was far better than in most of such movies.
It was also fun seeing that the director wasn't afraid to make a movie that openly criticizes the Catholic church and the way that a lot of people perceive it, so as nothing more than a huge criminal organisation hiding in plain sight.
If you like the found footage genre, you'll definitely like this movie. My partner loves this genre and even she said that it's one of the best ones she ever watched!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesToutes les informations contiennent des spoilers
- GaffesJust after Stan subdues Agent Ortiz by slashing her throat, he turns back to his computer and accidentally calls to Rat but says "Cat?"
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Resurrected?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 191 359 $US
- Durée
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant