NOTE IMDb
5,0/10
1,4 k
MA NOTE
À l'aube de la guerre froide, deux marshals américains poursuivent un meurtrier recherché dans les déserts du Nevada.À l'aube de la guerre froide, deux marshals américains poursuivent un meurtrier recherché dans les déserts du Nevada.À l'aube de la guerre froide, deux marshals américains poursuivent un meurtrier recherché dans les déserts du Nevada.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 3 nominations au total
Johnny Hoeft
- Little Jim Roscoe
- (as Johnny Ray)
Avis à la une
Let me save you some time, don't watch this.
I decided to watch it based upon other reviews saying it's good, and the description sounded interesting. Well, unfortunately, all the other raving reviews are by people who are extremely intoxicated - or have the worst taste in movies ever. I cannot enjoy this, it's pretty terrible.
The acting is wooden at best, the plot and story isn't terrible, that's what first drew me to the movie after all. Unfortunately the pacing and actions of the characters is pretty ridiculous, almost cartoonish at how bad it all is, the characters are barely 1 dimensional, the pacing is delayed and awkward, almost uncomfortable at times, nothing flows or feels real. The cinematography and sound is completely awful, like someone is using an old camera they found in their parents closet, which of course isn't doing the already struggling actors any favors.
A good director could possibly take this movie and make it good with a lot of work and re-takes. Sadly, it's pretty clear that isn't the case here, there is no chemistry at all. I've been more drawn into and invested in high-school and college theater productions than I am to this movie.
I got halfway through and I had to stop. I hope this review saves someone else from wasting their evening.
I decided to watch it based upon other reviews saying it's good, and the description sounded interesting. Well, unfortunately, all the other raving reviews are by people who are extremely intoxicated - or have the worst taste in movies ever. I cannot enjoy this, it's pretty terrible.
The acting is wooden at best, the plot and story isn't terrible, that's what first drew me to the movie after all. Unfortunately the pacing and actions of the characters is pretty ridiculous, almost cartoonish at how bad it all is, the characters are barely 1 dimensional, the pacing is delayed and awkward, almost uncomfortable at times, nothing flows or feels real. The cinematography and sound is completely awful, like someone is using an old camera they found in their parents closet, which of course isn't doing the already struggling actors any favors.
A good director could possibly take this movie and make it good with a lot of work and re-takes. Sadly, it's pretty clear that isn't the case here, there is no chemistry at all. I've been more drawn into and invested in high-school and college theater productions than I am to this movie.
I got halfway through and I had to stop. I hope this review saves someone else from wasting their evening.
Believe i watched it all the way through, but...i'm glad that i did...
i know part of the reason, at LEAST, was the cast...i don't remember the last time i saw Harvey Keitel in anything... but i was real glad to see that he was part of the cast... and then there's Keith Carradine...Graham Greene...and i'd be remiss if i didn't mention Forrie Smith, who plays Lloyd on Yellowstone...
it was whack central as far as tone and characterizations go...trying to get that 60s feel in the mix...it didn't do a bad job of that, either...making much of it come off as comedic, as far as i was concerned...so i laughed through a lot of it...it has an unexpected turn in the last act, though...which, to a large degree, made it worthwhile sticking around... if any of this sounds appealing and you don't feel like you have anything better to watch(i did. But i just couldn't resist the draw of this cast), then i'd say go for it...interestingly enough, the other reviewers seemed to feel the same way i do...all two of them... ; - )
"Laws of Man" begins with promise, offering an engaging story, immersive 1960s visuals, and strong performances from Jackson Rathbone and Jacob Keohane. Dusty roads and rundown towns set the tone, but the narrative derails midway with unnecessary scenes and an unsatisfying, inconsistent ending. Characters like Frank and Benjamin Bonney feel believable, but others, like Callie and Armstrong, lack credibility, and Cassidy's role is confusing. While Frank's dialogue fits the setting, Tommy's lines and behavior fail to convince as a U. S. Marshal. Emotional impact fades after a strong start, and the missed opportunity to use music for added immersion further weakens the experience. Ultimately, poor story choices and pacing issues leave little rewatchability or lasting impression.
I think the plot, as thin as it is, is maybe the saving grace for this...hm..."movie".
The acting is very wooden and I would bet money on that the cinematographer is straight out of film school as the cinematography is so childishly simple and tries to use tired tropes - and fails. Yikes.
I lasted about 30-35 mins then the acting and camera got the best of me and I had to turn this thing off.
I'd say stay away from this one.
I think the plot, as thin as it is, is maybe the saving grace for this...hm..."movie".
The acting is very wooden and I would bet money on that the cinematographer is straight out of film school as the cinematography is so childishly simple and tries to use tired tropes - and fails. Yikes.
I lasted about 30-35 mins then the acting and camera got the best of me and I had to turn this thing off.
I'd say stay away from this one.
The acting is very wooden and I would bet money on that the cinematographer is straight out of film school as the cinematography is so childishly simple and tries to use tired tropes - and fails. Yikes.
I lasted about 30-35 mins then the acting and camera got the best of me and I had to turn this thing off.
I'd say stay away from this one.
I think the plot, as thin as it is, is maybe the saving grace for this...hm..."movie".
The acting is very wooden and I would bet money on that the cinematographer is straight out of film school as the cinematography is so childishly simple and tries to use tired tropes - and fails. Yikes.
I lasted about 30-35 mins then the acting and camera got the best of me and I had to turn this thing off.
I'd say stay away from this one.
You can taste the Nevada desert dust as the two Feds roll into some godforsaken barely existent town to do their job. Jackson Rathbone immediately draws you in. What happens next sets the tone for the twists and turns in this 1960's original yet throwback movie with early standout performances from Richard Brake and Michael P Walker. Unique and iconic Actors Dermot Mulroney, Harvey Keitel and even Graham Greene get your attention with their respective participation in a story you really don't see coming. You even get Forrie Smith of Yellowstone fame. I think this is a movie I will watch twice to pick up the details I missed the first time. Enjoy an Original;)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesKeith Carradine and Harvey Keitel previously appeared in Welcome to Los Angeles (1976), Les Duellistes (1977) and L'enquête (1987).
- Citations
Sheriff Kutch: I'm telling you they are very dangerous men so you and Barney Fife here better watch your ass.
- ConnexionsReferences The Andy Griffith Show (1960)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Laws of Man?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Законы человечества
- Lieux de tournage
- Las Vegas, Nouveau-Mexique, États-Unis(Last Chance Motel Bar)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 38 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant