Blade Runner 2049
Un jeune agent spécial fait une découverte qui l'amène à la recherche d'un ancien agent nommé Rick Deckard, porté disparu depuis 30 ans.Un jeune agent spécial fait une découverte qui l'amène à la recherche d'un ancien agent nommé Rick Deckard, porté disparu depuis 30 ans.Un jeune agent spécial fait une découverte qui l'amène à la recherche d'un ancien agent nommé Rick Deckard, porté disparu depuis 30 ans.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
- Récompensé par 2 Oscars
- 100 victoires et 164 nominations au total
8,0735.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Blade Runner 2049' is lauded for its visuals, world-building, and themes. Performances by Gosling and Ford, and Villeneuve's direction receive acclaim. Criticisms include slow pace, lack of originality, and plot issues. Some find it inferior to the original, while others see it as a successful expansion. Length and pacing are frequent drawbacks, though many appreciate its artistic ambition and thought-provoking nature.
Avis à la une
Slow and beautiful
I guess if the producers wanted to make another Blade Runner, they totally succeeded - at least so far. As with the original Blade Runner the visuals are the ones that people will refer to when it comes to this movie. And it's not just because of the Academy Awards. You can tell all by yourself and I reckon even without having seen it on an IMAX screen (though I would have recommended it and still am).
Having said all that, the movie has also the same irritating feeling about it, that the original Blade Runner had. So in almost every aspect it is a successor to it. Story wise obviously too, though I guess this one has a couple of shorts that play before this movie, that are supposed to get you in the mood. They are not necessary to watch, but they are also very well made. This movie is an experience and it is one you have to be willing to make.
While it does have some action scenes, while it is Science Fiction, it does play more like a slow moving drama with a lot of mystery elements to it. If that sounds intriguing to you, with some added social commentary flavor, than by all means watch it. But beware that you have to have patience with it ...
Having said all that, the movie has also the same irritating feeling about it, that the original Blade Runner had. So in almost every aspect it is a successor to it. Story wise obviously too, though I guess this one has a couple of shorts that play before this movie, that are supposed to get you in the mood. They are not necessary to watch, but they are also very well made. This movie is an experience and it is one you have to be willing to make.
While it does have some action scenes, while it is Science Fiction, it does play more like a slow moving drama with a lot of mystery elements to it. If that sounds intriguing to you, with some added social commentary flavor, than by all means watch it. But beware that you have to have patience with it ...
pure cinema
It's 2049 Los Angeles. K (Ryan Gosling) is a Blade Runner hunting for old Nexus 8 replicants under LAPD Lieutenant Joshi (Robin Wright). After the 2022 blackout, most records have been erased or corrupted. Tyrell is out of business and replicant production had been outlawed until Niander Wallace (Jared Leto). Wallace is producing a new obedient replicant. Luv (Sylvia Hoeks) is his replicant henchwoman. K hunts down an old Nexus 8 and in the process, he discovers a surprise which leads to Deckard (Harrison Ford). Joi (Ana de Armas) is K's holographic computer girlfriend. Mariette (Mackenzie Davis) is a prostitute.
This is pure cinema although I can see some object to the length and dark depressing sensibilities. For the most part, the action is not intended to be fun. Some people will feel the long running time more than others. An easy test is whether the person likes the original or any cyberpunk sci-fi anime. This takes the original's visual mastery and adds a more compelling detective mystery. Any BR fan will undoubtedly love this unless they are some nitpicking fanatic. Non-fans may find this more appealing... or not.
The original's detective story and pacing are its major flaws. This sequel has a real detective story with a real mystery. The writing is impeccable. The designs take the original vision and dives right in. Roger Deakins' work is beyond beautiful. Villeneuve is at the top of his game. Gosling is a more effective lead. Ford comes in during the second half and is a more fun Deckard. Ana de Armas is a gorgeous vision of girl perfection. Sylvia Hoeks is an amazing villain. The movie tackles all of the ideas without hitting one over the head. This is a great film although I'm not sure if popular modern audience will take to it. The opening box office certainly does not suggest that.
This is pure cinema although I can see some object to the length and dark depressing sensibilities. For the most part, the action is not intended to be fun. Some people will feel the long running time more than others. An easy test is whether the person likes the original or any cyberpunk sci-fi anime. This takes the original's visual mastery and adds a more compelling detective mystery. Any BR fan will undoubtedly love this unless they are some nitpicking fanatic. Non-fans may find this more appealing... or not.
The original's detective story and pacing are its major flaws. This sequel has a real detective story with a real mystery. The writing is impeccable. The designs take the original vision and dives right in. Roger Deakins' work is beyond beautiful. Villeneuve is at the top of his game. Gosling is a more effective lead. Ford comes in during the second half and is a more fun Deckard. Ana de Armas is a gorgeous vision of girl perfection. Sylvia Hoeks is an amazing villain. The movie tackles all of the ideas without hitting one over the head. This is a great film although I'm not sure if popular modern audience will take to it. The opening box office certainly does not suggest that.
Intriguing and engaging
It is 2049, 30 years after the events of the previous movie. K is a Blade Runner, a policeman who tracks down and terminates replicants (androids) whose model are viewed dangerous to society. K is himself a replicant, but has been programmed to be beneficial to society. One day he tracks down and terminates a replicant that has managed to evade detection and capture for over 28 years. In his garden are found the remains of a female replicant. Shockingly, the woman died during childbirth and the baby appears to have survived. Replicants cannot reproduce. If word gets out that they can, the human-replicant hierarchy will forever be disturbed. K must find the child, quickly. Also after it is Niander Wallace, a billionaire whose company makes replicants and whose main interest is in changing the world order.
An intriguing and engaging movie, directed by Denis Villeneuve (Prisoners, Incendies, Sicario, Arrival) and co-written by Hampton Francher, who co-wrote the screenplay for the original Blade Runner. Good plot with some great twists and turns. Some clever manipulation of the viewer too, as you are funneled down one way of thinking, only to have things turn out in another direction. This unpredictability, and requirement that you use your brain, makes for some intriguing viewing.
Great special effects, without being too show-offy and gratuitous. Great action scenes too.
While I have seen the original Blade Runner (in all three forms), you don't have to have seen it in order to enjoy, or even understand, this one. It works fine as a standalone movie.
Solid performances by all involved.
On the negative side, the plot is not entirely water-tight. There are a few key moments where things take a turn for the implausible and contrived. The end result ultimately justified these turns, making me less critical of them, but the writers could easily have developed the plot around those moments more, in order to make them less loose and clumsy.
Though I thought it was going to be, the running time of 163 minutes is not an issue. The movie never drags and the time just flies by.
Great movie - certainly not your average sequel.
An intriguing and engaging movie, directed by Denis Villeneuve (Prisoners, Incendies, Sicario, Arrival) and co-written by Hampton Francher, who co-wrote the screenplay for the original Blade Runner. Good plot with some great twists and turns. Some clever manipulation of the viewer too, as you are funneled down one way of thinking, only to have things turn out in another direction. This unpredictability, and requirement that you use your brain, makes for some intriguing viewing.
Great special effects, without being too show-offy and gratuitous. Great action scenes too.
While I have seen the original Blade Runner (in all three forms), you don't have to have seen it in order to enjoy, or even understand, this one. It works fine as a standalone movie.
Solid performances by all involved.
On the negative side, the plot is not entirely water-tight. There are a few key moments where things take a turn for the implausible and contrived. The end result ultimately justified these turns, making me less critical of them, but the writers could easily have developed the plot around those moments more, in order to make them less loose and clumsy.
Though I thought it was going to be, the running time of 163 minutes is not an issue. The movie never drags and the time just flies by.
Great movie - certainly not your average sequel.
The Truth in the Rain
To chase after an iconic masterpiece, to imitate or to try and supplant its rightful place, is a fool's errand.
Thankfully director Denis Villeneuve along with his talented collaborators never succumbs to imitating or trying to super-cede Ridley Scott's 1982 landmark "Blade Runner".
Hampton Fancher, who created the story of the original, has crafted a new screenplay with Michael Green, that not only builds on the themes of "Blade Runner", but ties them together with larger questions about the current human state and its challenges.
Ryan Gosling stars as a replicant of the latest generation, who tries to solve a puzzle that leads him into the realm of real and manufactured life, and walks along the same noirish paths that made the original so gripping. Gosling imbues his character with a very compelling façade, which starts to crumble as his humanity takes over his mechanical design.
The equally thrilling performances by Jared Leto, Ana De Armas, Robin Wright, Carla Juri and of course Mr. Harrison Ford, forge a credible bond with the audience and enhance the visual grandeur created by cinematographer Roger Deakins and production designer Dennis Gassner.
And although "Blade Runner 2049" may not achieve the same level of force as its predecessor, it is a tremendously immersive, philosophical and touching experience, that should be enjoyed on the largest screen possible.
The movie's pace is deliberately patient, which may confuse some members of the audience. But by slowing down and observing, the audience can revel in the immensity of the images.
The more we move, inexorably it seems, towards the do-or-die reality of "Blade Runner", the more vital these stories become.
Whatever the box-office-fate of "Blade Runner 2049" will be, the long wait has paid off. It is far more than just a quick cash-in on a cult classic or an overly devoted sequel. It stands on its own and adds many new layers to the question: "What makes us human?"
And it urges us on to find the truth in the rain.
Thankfully director Denis Villeneuve along with his talented collaborators never succumbs to imitating or trying to super-cede Ridley Scott's 1982 landmark "Blade Runner".
Hampton Fancher, who created the story of the original, has crafted a new screenplay with Michael Green, that not only builds on the themes of "Blade Runner", but ties them together with larger questions about the current human state and its challenges.
Ryan Gosling stars as a replicant of the latest generation, who tries to solve a puzzle that leads him into the realm of real and manufactured life, and walks along the same noirish paths that made the original so gripping. Gosling imbues his character with a very compelling façade, which starts to crumble as his humanity takes over his mechanical design.
The equally thrilling performances by Jared Leto, Ana De Armas, Robin Wright, Carla Juri and of course Mr. Harrison Ford, forge a credible bond with the audience and enhance the visual grandeur created by cinematographer Roger Deakins and production designer Dennis Gassner.
And although "Blade Runner 2049" may not achieve the same level of force as its predecessor, it is a tremendously immersive, philosophical and touching experience, that should be enjoyed on the largest screen possible.
The movie's pace is deliberately patient, which may confuse some members of the audience. But by slowing down and observing, the audience can revel in the immensity of the images.
The more we move, inexorably it seems, towards the do-or-die reality of "Blade Runner", the more vital these stories become.
Whatever the box-office-fate of "Blade Runner 2049" will be, the long wait has paid off. It is far more than just a quick cash-in on a cult classic or an overly devoted sequel. It stands on its own and adds many new layers to the question: "What makes us human?"
And it urges us on to find the truth in the rain.
8rgme
I came, I saw, I smiled - BladeRunner Outshines
I wanted to believe the hype, i truly did - don't get me wrong though, the movie was great, the effects and the scenery was amazing; the movie in itself had a peculiar simple message;" Believe in Love and Miracles will happen ".
For Hollywood to tell a tale about love nowadays is unique, even more uncommon to tell it with a huge franchise since most of them are destroyed by clueless, uneducated and privileged writers who lacks the imagination and creativity to write a simple tale about a virtue or any virtue; writing a story isn't hard, it just takes time and dedication to understand the purpose and meaning of a story, and it isn't subjective.
If you want to see a love story in a sci-fi environment;" Its great ". If you want to see an action movie;" Its great ". if you want it to be a BladeRunner sequel,then I'm gonna be honest and say; "It is" - but is it the greatest movie of the year for me; "No".
It is a great movie to see with your friends or with your partner and it has a little of everything for everybody to leave with a smile.
For Hollywood to tell a tale about love nowadays is unique, even more uncommon to tell it with a huge franchise since most of them are destroyed by clueless, uneducated and privileged writers who lacks the imagination and creativity to write a simple tale about a virtue or any virtue; writing a story isn't hard, it just takes time and dedication to understand the purpose and meaning of a story, and it isn't subjective.
If you want to see a love story in a sci-fi environment;" Its great ". If you want to see an action movie;" Its great ". if you want it to be a BladeRunner sequel,then I'm gonna be honest and say; "It is" - but is it the greatest movie of the year for me; "No".
It is a great movie to see with your friends or with your partner and it has a little of everything for everybody to leave with a smile.
Bande-son
Écoutez un extrait de la bande originale ici et continuez à l'écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe first letter of the names of each of the wooden animals that Rick Deckard carved in this movie: Rhino, Antelope, Cat, Horse, Elephant, Lion, spell "RACHEL".
- Gaffes(at around 2h 30 mins) At the end of the film when K leans back against the steps, you can see an indention in the snow where his elbow is about to be placed, leading one to believe that this is a continuity error and that the indentation is from a previous take. However, if you look as he sits down, he places his hand on the step to lower himself down, creating the indentation where his elbow will later rest.
- Citations
Niander Wallace: Pain reminds you the joy you felt was real. More joy, then! Do not be afraid.
- Crédits fousThere are no opening credits, and the title proper is not shown until the ending credits.
- Versions alternativesThe IMAX print viewed by Turkish film critics at the movie's press screening in two days advance of its Turkish theatrical release censors nudity by digital zooming. Since the movie had not yet been classified by Turkish censors at the time of the press screening, this intervention appears to have been carried out by Sony Pictures for the Turkish market, as well as for some non-Western markets in general.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Film '72: Épisode #46.1 (2017)
- Bandes originalesSummer Wind
Written by Johnny Mercer, Hans Bradtke and Henry Mayer
Performed by Frank Sinatra
Courtesy of Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLC
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Blade Runner 2049?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 150 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 92 071 675 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 32 753 122 $US
- 8 oct. 2017
- Montant brut mondial
- 277 937 605 $US
- Durée
- 2h 44min(164 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant




