Au plus fort de la bataille d'Angleterre, une escadrille de pilotes de Spitfire épuisés se bat jusqu'au dernier pour défendre leur pays.Au plus fort de la bataille d'Angleterre, une escadrille de pilotes de Spitfire épuisés se bat jusqu'au dernier pour défendre leur pays.Au plus fort de la bataille d'Angleterre, une escadrille de pilotes de Spitfire épuisés se bat jusqu'au dernier pour défendre leur pays.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Filmed and produced on a budget of 10 shillings and 6 pence, this utter load of rubbish is a disgrace and a slap in the face of real WWII veterans who fought and died in the conflict. Actors who have no idea of period acting, aircraft straight out of an X-box game, the combat sequences are ridiculous and the use of a garden shed for a flight dispersal defies belief. Background extras walking about wearing odd bits of uniforms, the whole film is complete farce. How anyone can take this level of amateur filmmaking seriously is beyond belief, whoever rated this higher than 2 stars must have been watching something completely different.
This is not a film for watching, it's a film for bypassing and avoiding...
This is not a film for watching, it's a film for bypassing and avoiding...
The earliest WW 2 films featuring pilots are head and shoulders over this production. The production values are extremely limited, even as the actors try their best to make the thin script into something more than it is.
There are no dives or climbs, as one would see in almost every other WW2 plane film, there is just a video-game feeling about the targets, and it is highly impersonal, as we do not get to see any of the German pilots.
Even one scene of an enemy pilot would have added to the emotional content of the film, which, at best, was lukewarm.
I happened to have viewed A Yank in the RAF recently, and their battle scenes were far more effective than these tepid attempts. And that film was primarily a soap. For real airplane action, you are much better off seeing Wings, the WW1 Academy Award winner.
There are no dives or climbs, as one would see in almost every other WW2 plane film, there is just a video-game feeling about the targets, and it is highly impersonal, as we do not get to see any of the German pilots.
Even one scene of an enemy pilot would have added to the emotional content of the film, which, at best, was lukewarm.
I happened to have viewed A Yank in the RAF recently, and their battle scenes were far more effective than these tepid attempts. And that film was primarily a soap. For real airplane action, you are much better off seeing Wings, the WW1 Academy Award winner.
From the point of view of the remains of a squadron, with a new replacement after losing two pilots, this story is more about what it was like for the fighter pilots both during and in-between battle.
The acting is good and the story and characters are interesting enough to keep you engaged to the end.
The evidently low-budget does however impact scenes, flying scenes in particular, with some moments more convincing than others. I swear I saw one Spitfire fly through a Heinkel wing (remember a ship doing something similar in Star Wars?) and the scenes showing battle through the gun sights were poor, whereas, oddly, the shots of German fighters in the rear view mirror were better, if still not that great. In short, the effects were low budget.
There aren't many real "Spits" around anymore and at times it seemed like they only had the use of the same one on the ground.
If you are looking for a non-stop, action-filled Battle of Britain story filled with great air scenes and dog fights, you'll probably be very disappointed by what you see here - but if you are interested in a tale about the psychological strain of war and how different pilots dealt with it, this is worth a watch.
The acting is good and the story and characters are interesting enough to keep you engaged to the end.
The evidently low-budget does however impact scenes, flying scenes in particular, with some moments more convincing than others. I swear I saw one Spitfire fly through a Heinkel wing (remember a ship doing something similar in Star Wars?) and the scenes showing battle through the gun sights were poor, whereas, oddly, the shots of German fighters in the rear view mirror were better, if still not that great. In short, the effects were low budget.
There aren't many real "Spits" around anymore and at times it seemed like they only had the use of the same one on the ground.
If you are looking for a non-stop, action-filled Battle of Britain story filled with great air scenes and dog fights, you'll probably be very disappointed by what you see here - but if you are interested in a tale about the psychological strain of war and how different pilots dealt with it, this is worth a watch.
"Battle Over Britain" attempts to capture the intensity and heroism of World War II aviation but ultimately falters due to its glaring technical flaws, lackluster production values, and uninspired direction.
Visually, the film struggles with immersion. The cinematography is static and uninventive, failing to convey the dynamism of aerial combat. The dogfights, a crucial element in any war film centered on pilots, lack urgency and realism. Instead of sweeping camera movements and pulse-pounding aerial choreography, we get rigid, repetitive shots that resemble outdated flight simulation footage. The overuse of CGI, particularly in battle scenes, only exacerbates this issue, as the digital effects are glaringly unconvincing and fail to blend seamlessly with live-action sequences.
The production design is minimal to the point of distraction. The film's airbase setting is astonishingly sparse, consisting of a single Spitfire (which inexplicably serves multiple pilots), a makeshift shed doubling as squadron headquarters, and barely any support vehicles or personnel. The absence of crucial wartime details-such as proper refueling, rearming procedures, or even period-accurate uniforms-further strips the film of authenticity. These omissions make the film feel less like a historical drama and more like a low-budget reenactment.
The acting, while occasionally competent, is often wooden and lacks the gravitas needed for a war epic. Many performances feel modern and out of place, failing to capture the discipline and demeanor of 1940s RAF pilots. Dialogue is stilted, with prolonged, uneventful conversations that add little to character development or dramatic tension. The emotional weight of war-fear, camaraderie, and loss-is barely conveyed, leaving scenes that should be gripping feeling lifeless and mechanical.
Perhaps the most egregious failure is in storytelling. The film lacks a strong narrative arc, instead meandering through loosely connected events with no real stakes or momentum. A historical war film should thrive on tension and character investment, yet Battle Over Britain offers neither. The absence of an enemy perspective also drains the film of depth, reducing aerial combat to an impersonal, video-game-like experience rather than a harrowing fight for survival.
While the film may have been made with genuine enthusiasm, it ultimately falls flat as both a war drama and a cinematic experience. With a more meticulous approach to historical accuracy, stronger direction, and a more engaging screenplay, Battle Over Britain could have been a worthy addition to the WWII film canon. Instead, it serves as a frustrating reminder that ambition alone cannot compensate for technical shortcomings and lack of storytelling finesse.
Of course, the title Battle over Britain is quite an overstatement. What is depicted here, at best, are a few isolated skirmishes rather than a comprehensive vision of what this epic battle truly was. It has been cemented in history with a name that carries weight and significance, yet in this case, it has been undeservedly appropriated-an act of naivety at best, and at worst, a rather sly opportunism.
Visually, the film struggles with immersion. The cinematography is static and uninventive, failing to convey the dynamism of aerial combat. The dogfights, a crucial element in any war film centered on pilots, lack urgency and realism. Instead of sweeping camera movements and pulse-pounding aerial choreography, we get rigid, repetitive shots that resemble outdated flight simulation footage. The overuse of CGI, particularly in battle scenes, only exacerbates this issue, as the digital effects are glaringly unconvincing and fail to blend seamlessly with live-action sequences.
The production design is minimal to the point of distraction. The film's airbase setting is astonishingly sparse, consisting of a single Spitfire (which inexplicably serves multiple pilots), a makeshift shed doubling as squadron headquarters, and barely any support vehicles or personnel. The absence of crucial wartime details-such as proper refueling, rearming procedures, or even period-accurate uniforms-further strips the film of authenticity. These omissions make the film feel less like a historical drama and more like a low-budget reenactment.
The acting, while occasionally competent, is often wooden and lacks the gravitas needed for a war epic. Many performances feel modern and out of place, failing to capture the discipline and demeanor of 1940s RAF pilots. Dialogue is stilted, with prolonged, uneventful conversations that add little to character development or dramatic tension. The emotional weight of war-fear, camaraderie, and loss-is barely conveyed, leaving scenes that should be gripping feeling lifeless and mechanical.
Perhaps the most egregious failure is in storytelling. The film lacks a strong narrative arc, instead meandering through loosely connected events with no real stakes or momentum. A historical war film should thrive on tension and character investment, yet Battle Over Britain offers neither. The absence of an enemy perspective also drains the film of depth, reducing aerial combat to an impersonal, video-game-like experience rather than a harrowing fight for survival.
While the film may have been made with genuine enthusiasm, it ultimately falls flat as both a war drama and a cinematic experience. With a more meticulous approach to historical accuracy, stronger direction, and a more engaging screenplay, Battle Over Britain could have been a worthy addition to the WWII film canon. Instead, it serves as a frustrating reminder that ambition alone cannot compensate for technical shortcomings and lack of storytelling finesse.
Of course, the title Battle over Britain is quite an overstatement. What is depicted here, at best, are a few isolated skirmishes rather than a comprehensive vision of what this epic battle truly was. It has been cemented in history with a name that carries weight and significance, yet in this case, it has been undeservedly appropriated-an act of naivety at best, and at worst, a rather sly opportunism.
I'm sat watching now.
As a film, as a concept of bringing back the Classic British War Film, it's a great attempt. Not a blockbuster, not a study in of human endeavour in any real depth, just a story and a scenario of RAF Pilots 'doing their jobs'.
There is some plotline of sorts revolving around a competition of kills for a prize pot, the main driver of the competition being a bluff Yorkshireman (accent like Sean Bean) who has a cold exterior of a personality, not particularly likeable.
In short, it's ok, 1hr 20 min, and actually worth the time. Makes a change to see a film in slow burn mode and not to be bashed around the head with multi plot line set-ups to be able to play the last 20 mins punchline.
Give it a go.
As a film, as a concept of bringing back the Classic British War Film, it's a great attempt. Not a blockbuster, not a study in of human endeavour in any real depth, just a story and a scenario of RAF Pilots 'doing their jobs'.
There is some plotline of sorts revolving around a competition of kills for a prize pot, the main driver of the competition being a bluff Yorkshireman (accent like Sean Bean) who has a cold exterior of a personality, not particularly likeable.
In short, it's ok, 1hr 20 min, and actually worth the time. Makes a change to see a film in slow burn mode and not to be bashed around the head with multi plot line set-ups to be able to play the last 20 mins punchline.
Give it a go.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Battle Over Britain?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 3 912 $US
- Durée1 heure 20 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant