Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA man is on a plane when he sees his daughter being stalked via the Home security systemA man is on a plane when he sees his daughter being stalked via the Home security systemA man is on a plane when he sees his daughter being stalked via the Home security system
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Vanessa Deleon
- Flight Attendant
- (as Jessica Vanessa)
Alexandria Kristin Sanders
- Airline Clerk
- (as Alexandria Sanders)
Avis à la une
How can an experienced filmmaker Chris Stokes with over 40 directorial credits and almost as many writing and producing credits come up with such nonsense... aren't you supposed to get better the more films you make instead of worse? Aside from the obvious Scream rip-off, adding a predictable and infantile 5-minute twist at the end doesn't justify wasting viewers time with this mess.
Stokes also seems he hasn't learned how to direct his cast properly, because aside from MJW (who was the only draw to see this mess) who can carry his own without cast direction, every other actor seemed like this was their first acting job. And if you want to see this film because of MJW, trust me, you will see zero of his martial arts skills, he was only cast to draw an audience, that like myself, will be very disappointed.
Aside from MJW, all casting and performances were amateur hour. The story was riddled with plot and technical issues, and aside from being cliched, you will get more eyerolls and cringe with the laughable dialogue and nonsense screenplay. Even at a normally comfortable 85 min runtime, this film dragged on and felt never-ending with it's sappy dialogue, terrible acting, and cringeworthy story. Even the pin-hole camera shots were more annoying than effective. There's nothing redeemable about this mess, and I can go on and on how bad this was, but I've already wasted enough time watching this mess so you don't have to, so enough said. It's a generous 2/10 all going to MJW who was miscast and underutilized. My tittle says it all.
Stokes also seems he hasn't learned how to direct his cast properly, because aside from MJW (who was the only draw to see this mess) who can carry his own without cast direction, every other actor seemed like this was their first acting job. And if you want to see this film because of MJW, trust me, you will see zero of his martial arts skills, he was only cast to draw an audience, that like myself, will be very disappointed.
Aside from MJW, all casting and performances were amateur hour. The story was riddled with plot and technical issues, and aside from being cliched, you will get more eyerolls and cringe with the laughable dialogue and nonsense screenplay. Even at a normally comfortable 85 min runtime, this film dragged on and felt never-ending with it's sappy dialogue, terrible acting, and cringeworthy story. Even the pin-hole camera shots were more annoying than effective. There's nothing redeemable about this mess, and I can go on and on how bad this was, but I've already wasted enough time watching this mess so you don't have to, so enough said. It's a generous 2/10 all going to MJW who was miscast and underutilized. My tittle says it all.
I have no idea why I finished watching this, but I'm glad I did because it really did get worse at the end, which seemed pretty impossible. The acting was just horrible. The only thing worse was the stilted, cliched dialog. It was like the actors were reading cue cards of a script they hadn't read before too, with the same measured talking. And then when we get to what should have been the last scene, we're thrown what the writer thinks is a plot twist. But what it really does is rewrite the whole movie in 5 minutes, even down to reshooting the last scene with new dialog. Just dreadful. From acting to directing and writing, this movie has no redeeming qualities. Even the soundtrack is awful and doesn't support the scenes at all. It doesn't even qualify as so bad, it's good. It's just bad.
Sorry but this might be the worst movie ever made. I actually can't believe I sat through it all-well, if you consider playing Call of Duty and eating snacks at the same time.
The acting was horrendous, and it was obviously backed by the poor writing from Marques Houston. The story was so ridiculous that I don't even want to describe what happened.
The only thing good was the smoking hot stewardess on the airplane, which Michael Jai wound up .... Smh, never mind.
Actually, I wouldn't say the acting was bad-the cast did alright. It's just that when the story is written like a high school play, it just doesn't work. You don't feel invested.
I'm done writing. This movie .. it just ... yes, it belonged on Tubi. I wonder if it had a premiere? That must have been a funny night seeing all the reactions. LMAO.
The acting was horrendous, and it was obviously backed by the poor writing from Marques Houston. The story was so ridiculous that I don't even want to describe what happened.
The only thing good was the smoking hot stewardess on the airplane, which Michael Jai wound up .... Smh, never mind.
Actually, I wouldn't say the acting was bad-the cast did alright. It's just that when the story is written like a high school play, it just doesn't work. You don't feel invested.
I'm done writing. This movie .. it just ... yes, it belonged on Tubi. I wonder if it had a premiere? That must have been a funny night seeing all the reactions. LMAO.
So some of you hated it.
Academy award winner? No. Far from it. But here's a tidbit for the haters: It's a m-o-v-I-e.
A few gaps here and there, several facepalms, a head slap or two accompanied by the occasional groan. But still entertaining enough.
As far as we were concerned, we did t have any problems with and watched, as was our prerogative , the entire movie. Sometimes you just want to sit and chill, relax, have a snack, and watch a flick. Watching the agony of a major player as he watches what's going on helplessly at 30,000 feet is pretty intense. And what really hits home is that with our technology nowadays, his predicament is believable.
Academy award winner? No. Far from it. But here's a tidbit for the haters: It's a m-o-v-I-e.
A few gaps here and there, several facepalms, a head slap or two accompanied by the occasional groan. But still entertaining enough.
As far as we were concerned, we did t have any problems with and watched, as was our prerogative , the entire movie. Sometimes you just want to sit and chill, relax, have a snack, and watch a flick. Watching the agony of a major player as he watches what's going on helplessly at 30,000 feet is pretty intense. And what really hits home is that with our technology nowadays, his predicament is believable.
I resent that anyone put up funds to make this stinker. You need to look no further than the opening scene where they have an actress who is at least 10 years older than she is supposed to be portraying. She keeps answering her phone even though she knows it is a prank caller. It even showed on her phone that the incoming caller's phone number was blocked yet she still continues to answer it. Then she goes downstairs and unlocks the front door and goes outside. If she was frightened she would invite an intruder in by unlocking the front door. Stop pushing garbage, go back to film school and leave filmmaking to the pros.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsFeatures Juste pour une nuit (2016)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is You're Not Alone?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ти не сама
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 6 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was You're Not Alone (2023) officially released in India in English?
Répondre