Emma accepte un emploi d'aide-soignante auprès d'une vieille dame sénile. Des choses étranges commencent à se produire dans la maison. Ce qu'Emma ne sait pas, c'est que la maison cache un se... Tout lireEmma accepte un emploi d'aide-soignante auprès d'une vieille dame sénile. Des choses étranges commencent à se produire dans la maison. Ce qu'Emma ne sait pas, c'est que la maison cache un secret terrifiant.Emma accepte un emploi d'aide-soignante auprès d'une vieille dame sénile. Des choses étranges commencent à se produire dans la maison. Ce qu'Emma ne sait pas, c'est que la maison cache un secret terrifiant.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Avis à la une
You'd be hard pushed to find something worse.
It's not even a B movie, it's much further down the alphabet.
The acting is hideous- just pathetic. It's Hollyoaks with Eastern European accents. The 'action' scenes (I use the phrase lightly) are simply woeful. Laurel and Hardy looked more realistic.
Then there is the effort at suspenseful music- I think the pianist had 7 fingers amputated.
The story is weak as a can of Carling and there is absolutely nothing gripping about tge storyline or tge characters. At one point, I partly wanted the main protagonist to be killed just for being so utterly stupid. Avoid.
It's not even a B movie, it's much further down the alphabet.
The acting is hideous- just pathetic. It's Hollyoaks with Eastern European accents. The 'action' scenes (I use the phrase lightly) are simply woeful. Laurel and Hardy looked more realistic.
Then there is the effort at suspenseful music- I think the pianist had 7 fingers amputated.
The story is weak as a can of Carling and there is absolutely nothing gripping about tge storyline or tge characters. At one point, I partly wanted the main protagonist to be killed just for being so utterly stupid. Avoid.
Whenever I review a film that I rated under 5 stars I tend to start by completely spoiling a plot and pre-checking that "yes" button asking me if my review contains spoilers. I'm doing this for the common viewer. If I spoil it for you, perhaps I'll save you from watching it, but in this case, there isn't really much to spoil. The plot can be summed up in a single sentence, but the creators must have thought it was so deep that it needed a many layered ending.
This should-have-been-a-short disaster contains about 20 minutes of screaming without any score behind it, so if you watch it, make sure you keep the volume down or your neighbors might call 911, because that's what normal people do when they hear scream and numerous gunshots in real life. Shoot. Is that a spoiler. Nah, don't think so.
This should-have-been-a-short disaster contains about 20 minutes of screaming without any score behind it, so if you watch it, make sure you keep the volume down or your neighbors might call 911, because that's what normal people do when they hear scream and numerous gunshots in real life. Shoot. Is that a spoiler. Nah, don't think so.
After reading many negative reviews, I have to say I disagree. While this film's plot isn't Oscar-worthy, I enjoyed it as a solid psychological thriller.
The performances, especially from the main character, were convincing and kept me engaged. It relies on classic horror tools like jump scares and a creepy house, and these elements work well to create a tense and unsettling atmosphere.
The twists were well-timed, and it had moments that genuinely left me unsettled.
If I must criticize something, it would be the ending, which felt like an unnecessary story extension.
But IMHO, it's still worth a watch if you're into suspense and psychological thrillers.
The performances, especially from the main character, were convincing and kept me engaged. It relies on classic horror tools like jump scares and a creepy house, and these elements work well to create a tense and unsettling atmosphere.
The twists were well-timed, and it had moments that genuinely left me unsettled.
If I must criticize something, it would be the ending, which felt like an unnecessary story extension.
But IMHO, it's still worth a watch if you're into suspense and psychological thrillers.
IGNORE POSITIVE COMMENTS THE MOVIE IS TRASH. SHE COULD ESCPAE THE HOUSE 50 TIMES .
THE PRODUCTION IS AWFULL . DONT WASTE TIME.
THE MOVIE HAD POTENTIAL BUT , WAS SO BAD AT THE END.
FIRST 20 MINUTES WERE ACTUALLY PRETTY INTRESTING .
BUT THE REST OF THE MOVIE WAS HARD TO WATCH .
40 % OF MOVIE WAS SCENES WHERE THE MAIN ACTOR OR THE SO CALLED "CAREGIVER" IS MOVING UP OR DOWN STAIR OR JUST CENES OF HER CRYING FOR 50 SECOND.
THE MOVIE HAD POTENTIAL BUT , WAS SO BAD AT THE END.
SHE COULD HAVE KILLET THE GRANNY LIKE 20 TIMES.
SHE KNOCKS HER OUT AND THEM LEAVES THE ROOM GOING TO THE OTHER , INSTEAD LEVING THE HOUSE.
IF YOU WANT TO WASTE YOUR TIME , ENJOY.
THE PRODUCTION IS AWFULL . DONT WASTE TIME.
THE MOVIE HAD POTENTIAL BUT , WAS SO BAD AT THE END.
FIRST 20 MINUTES WERE ACTUALLY PRETTY INTRESTING .
BUT THE REST OF THE MOVIE WAS HARD TO WATCH .
40 % OF MOVIE WAS SCENES WHERE THE MAIN ACTOR OR THE SO CALLED "CAREGIVER" IS MOVING UP OR DOWN STAIR OR JUST CENES OF HER CRYING FOR 50 SECOND.
THE MOVIE HAD POTENTIAL BUT , WAS SO BAD AT THE END.
SHE COULD HAVE KILLET THE GRANNY LIKE 20 TIMES.
SHE KNOCKS HER OUT AND THEM LEAVES THE ROOM GOING TO THE OTHER , INSTEAD LEVING THE HOUSE.
IF YOU WANT TO WASTE YOUR TIME , ENJOY.
The story is actually pretty good but the acting is terrible.
It starts out pretty good and we actually thought this is going to be a very watchable movie. So we were pretty excited. But then reality sets in.
The lead female role plays her part "ok", but you cannot say that for the rest. There will be scenes where you think....it this a joke. You will loose interest but still curious enough to get through it.
It is actually a shame as this could have been way better if they just took their time to really see this through again before release.
We love movies and really wanted to like this more.
The reason for not givning a 1 start is because of the lead role and the story.
It starts out pretty good and we actually thought this is going to be a very watchable movie. So we were pretty excited. But then reality sets in.
The lead female role plays her part "ok", but you cannot say that for the rest. There will be scenes where you think....it this a joke. You will loose interest but still curious enough to get through it.
It is actually a shame as this could have been way better if they just took their time to really see this through again before release.
We love movies and really wanted to like this more.
The reason for not givning a 1 start is because of the lead role and the story.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe story is set in New York, 1989. Days before the falling of the Berlin Wall.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Caregiver?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant