S.O.S. Fantômes : La Menace de glace
- 2024
- Tous publics
- 1h 55min
Lorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'un... Tout lireLorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'une seconde ère glaciaire.Lorsque la découverte d'un ancien artefact libère une force maléfique, les anciens et les nouveaux S.O.S. Fantômes doivent unir leurs forces pour protéger leur maison et sauver le monde d'une seconde ère glaciaire.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 8 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Most of the performances are adequate. It includes a large and diverse cast of all your favorite new, forgettable characters, played by actors from better films.
Perhaps most importantly, the film overflows with member berries and nostalgia bait for product craving consumers of all ages and backgrounds.
And in a financial sense, the corporate entities and creators behind the film were moderately successful, earning over $200 million dollars on a film with a $100 million dollar budget. Truly, a triumph in generic corporate film-making.
It's strange to me how it seems impossible for Hollywood to turn out a decent movie recently. Constant reshashing of old stories or franchises, with the inevitable eye-rolling tropes being added to make it more pc just smacks of desperation.
I could possibly understand the misguided attempts at girl-bossing every movie if it meant interesting plots, good acting, and clever writing, but fails so hard. Whatever happen to story-telling and good complex well-cast characters who are cast for their acting talent rather than immutable characteristics?
It's not awful, but it's definitely not 'great'. The cast is bloated, so it feels like a series of SNL sketches cut together. The main plot thread, Phoebe, is probably the least interesting character they could have chosen for the lead plot line. The handling of her character was heavy-handed and pandering. Yes there were sex jokes in the old movies, but Bill Murray's romance stories in the originals were one of their least interesting aspects, and apparently my distaste for romance stories in Ghostbusters movies has not changed.
The effects, sound, music, cinematography and general production value are of high quality. The acting is across the board because there're a zillion actors.
'Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire' snatches defeat from the jaws of victory in an effort to appeal to modern audiences, leading to a forgettable middle entry to what is likely a string of movies that are already declining in quality at a predictable rate.
This movie however, even though it has all the parts needed, was well shot and looked decent enough, had plenty of stars and the original cast, was just dull. Felt like an obligation. Comes across like the first draft and they just said "yeah go with that"..it's low energy low fun low everything. You won't hate it, but you'll probably lose interest half way through and you'd never watch it a second time. Maybe it was a contractual obligation that they make one in a certain amount of time or something, don't know, but it's disappointing.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBill Murray has frequently been cited as a reason any kind of sequel to S.O.S. fantômes II (1989) took so long to make. The actor's reputation as a "loose cannon" and his desire to distance himself from the franchise for many years led many fans to believe that movies such as S.O.S. fantômes: L'héritage (2021) and this film would never be made. However, director Gil Kenan, who directed Murray in La cité de l'ombre (2008), suggests that getting Murray back for this movie was quite easy, revealing: "Well, you know very well that Bill and I have a history because we made a movie together in 2007, a movie that almost cost [Bill his] life. That was the Hall H experience, and we won't go into too much. But it opened the door for Bill and I to have a relationship that has remained dynamic over the years. We've stayed friends, we've kept in touch. When I reached out to him to say that we were creating a story for Peter Venkman in this film, he was really enthusiastic."
- GaffesAn ancient artifact has been safely kept in a special brass lined room for decades and there are no issues until it is removed from the room. The main characters are aware of this, but nobody even suggests either returning the artifact to the room or making a brass lined container for the artifact. From what is shown, that should solve the problem.
- Citations
Nadeem Razmaadi: Does anyone have a lighter?
Ray Stantz: I quit smoking in the '90s.
Peter Venkman: [dryly] Proud of you then, proud of you now.
- Crédits fousThere is a mid-credits scene with a truck driver at a gas station at night.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Jeremy Jahns: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire - Movie Review (2024)
- Bandes originalesGhostbusters Original Themes
By Elmer Bernstein
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ghostbusters: Apocalipsis Fantasma
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 100 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 113 376 590 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 45 004 673 $US
- 24 mars 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 201 967 521 $US
- Durée
- 1h 55min(115 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1