Un régime autoritaire est sur le point de s'effondrer. L'histoire d'une année passée entre les murs de son palais.Un régime autoritaire est sur le point de s'effondrer. L'histoire d'une année passée entre les murs de son palais.Un régime autoritaire est sur le point de s'effondrer. L'histoire d'une année passée entre les murs de son palais.
- Nommé pour 1 Primetime Emmy
- 7 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
There's a lot to like about this show. The depiction of a geographically vague old dictatorship in Europe is spot on. It reminds of old autocracies like Romania or present-day Belarus , and constantly balances between amusingly farcical and quietly frightful. And Kate Winslet is absolutely at her peak here, as a nutty, narcissistic ruler.
It's a good thing that they've written it as a mini-series too, because the absurdities could have easily become stale after too many episodes. Unfortunately, the energy built up by the first five installments is not matched by what is essentially a cowardly sixth and last chapter. It opts for an unfulfilling ending that refuses to pick sides and leaves plenty of unanswered questions.
Still, it's highly entertaining and deserves to be watched.
It's a good thing that they've written it as a mini-series too, because the absurdities could have easily become stale after too many episodes. Unfortunately, the energy built up by the first five installments is not matched by what is essentially a cowardly sixth and last chapter. It opts for an unfulfilling ending that refuses to pick sides and leaves plenty of unanswered questions.
Still, it's highly entertaining and deserves to be watched.
By attempting to merge elements from "The Death of Stalin," "The Grand Budapest Hotel," and "Borat" into a single narrative, the show becomes a bewildering concoction rather than a cohesive piece. The 'satire' - if it can be called that - stumbles significantly, as it appears unanchored from any semblance of reality. Instead, it leans heavily on bizarrely synthesized stereotypes of Eastern Europe in the American imagination.
The characters are shallow caricatures, lacking depth and authenticity, which further distances the narrative from delivering any meaningful or resonant messages. The show oscillates between trying to be a biting political satire (of what, though?) and a slapstick comedy, never fully committing to either.
The production values and the performances by the cast are commendable for the most part, yet they are not nearly enough to salvage the show from its fundamental flaws.
The characters are shallow caricatures, lacking depth and authenticity, which further distances the narrative from delivering any meaningful or resonant messages. The show oscillates between trying to be a biting political satire (of what, though?) and a slapstick comedy, never fully committing to either.
The production values and the performances by the cast are commendable for the most part, yet they are not nearly enough to salvage the show from its fundamental flaws.
Ok, this is an odd one. And worthy of your attention. The premise seems imaginative but if you've an ear to world history and current events, the story is too plausible to be disregarded as fiction inspired by unrealistic fantasy. If you can't see the parallels to the insidious culture of indulging the sickest whims of our out-of-touch rulers, then this will probably be more irritating than relevant. Stop trying to compare it to anything else because you will mislead anyone curious about it. It's dark. Don't expect it to be humorous. Ironic, yes. Funny, no. The concept is relevant and the performances are fantastic. If you're looking for lighthearted entertainment, then this will probably not be for you. It requires a thoughtful, critical, and open mind to appreciate the satire. It's uncomfortable. It's disturbing in a very biting and calculated way to provoke thought. I like it.
I have to say I expected it to be way worse, and after watching 3 episodes I'm pleasantly surprised. Being from a post-communist country, I can definitely sense the satire and sarcasm of this show. They managed to portray the absurdity of dictatorships and its dictators pretty well. It reminds me of Lukashenko's Belarus or Ceausescu's Romania. I liked the subtle references to certain people and events. The "reunification" thing is basically what happened in Crimea, the Corporal practically became Elena's Rasputin for a while, and the whole "rural craze" was a spot on too, as such things really happened in my country during communism, not to mention faking some pseudo-historical theories of one's origin to boost their egos ("The Foundling"). I have to admit I am quite entertained, intrigued and want to watch more. Lastly, I will say that I'm not really surprised at the low rating, as there is many things about this show that your typical western audience simply wouldn't get.
Several people have mentioned that the negative reviews are from people too dense or too uneducated to see this series as anything but brilliant. That's an uneducated take in itself. It is possible to both understand the satirical narrative of the series and its winking lambasting of geopolitics, political theatre, and the delicate dance of those who keep the powerful in power, and still find it unpalatable.
It's not a bad series; the acting and cast are fantastic, and there is an interesting story being told. But it's buried beneath so many layers of mismatched cinematic styles, jaunty musical score, and washed out color palettes that the effect was like a confusing mishmash of distinct film styles like Expressionism, Film Noir, and Postmodernism. Each of these styles are great on their own, and perhaps there is a new genre of television being formed in the making of The Regime. It's promising, it's bold, but was ultimately too distracting for me to get lost in the narrative.
It's not a bad series; the acting and cast are fantastic, and there is an interesting story being told. But it's buried beneath so many layers of mismatched cinematic styles, jaunty musical score, and washed out color palettes that the effect was like a confusing mishmash of distinct film styles like Expressionism, Film Noir, and Postmodernism. Each of these styles are great on their own, and perhaps there is a new genre of television being formed in the making of The Regime. It's promising, it's bold, but was ultimately too distracting for me to get lost in the narrative.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesKate Winslet said of the outrageously dark and twisted spoof "I had never read a script like it, I I had never come across the character quite like her. And I knew that as a role for me, I had never played anything like her before and I wanted to do comedy. I love the fact that, yes, it's about a dictator, but she's also a female dictator. It's not a male dictator. And I knew the nuances and the feminine fragility that I could explore behind that mask."
- ConnexionsReferenced in 82nd Golden Globe Awards (2025)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Regime have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Regime
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant