The 101 Scariest Horror Movie Moments of All Time

Don't get me wrong... this is a really well made, entertaining movie but with one huge omission...the masterpiece that is 2008's 'Martyrs' from Pascal Laugier.

A list of the scariest movie moments has to include the frightening revelation we are witness to near the end of this French horror movie. It just adds complete relevance, meaning and substance to everything we have seen in the preceding acts.

Scary, gory and most importantly thought provoking in its brutality ... it's about something for a change, which you can't often say about todays 'jump-scare' let down horrors.

Can't believe it's not featured at all !!!

I enjoy the classic formula they are using my only complaint is that the episodes are too short it feels like as soon as you are settled into each episode it just abruptly ends. Not to nitpick but it is super clean compared to the original it lacks that Gothic punk feel that the original had that just gets you so pumped up to watch horror movies. Also loved all the random people they had on the Original show you never know who you'd see each segment, this is kind of the same few people , mainly some real new age actresses I've never even heard of. But looking forward to each episode! Apparently it needs to be 600 words to submit so just ignore this sentence.

I went in expecting this to play like the old "100 Scariest Movie Moments" I saw on YouTube, but this is different. The commentary goes a lot deeper, with directors like Edgar Wright and Fede Alvarez and film scholars (mostly very smart women) giving some great analysis of how successful horror scenes are constructed. There's also a lot of cross-referencing to other films, some in the genre and some not, and some of the connections are surprising. (For example, Wright compares a scary practical effect from the po-faced film The Witch to the Hammer camp classic Captain Kronos, Vampire Hunter. Wright also gives the funniest breakdown of Hellraiser I have ever heard.) The list is very eclectic and I get the feeling the ratings aren't meant to be taken seriously, which is fine because what scares people is so different from person to person -- my mother was terrified by Jaws and I'm kinda, yeah, I guess so? -- but I thought Sinister was scary and she thought it was "formulaic" and the monster was "uninspired," so there you have it. The numbering is probably a gimmick to get you watching, but I guess it worked because I am watching and liking it. 101 clips from horror films, some that I like and some I don't like, but the pace is fast so it doesn't take long to get to the next one. Good guests, good gender balance, really well-made. Perfect for Halloween. Love it.

Overall, I thought it was a really good list. I enjoyed watching the commentators whether it was a fellow actor, director, or film critic give their take on the movies. Just like with Eli Roth's History of Horror, the series will show small clips of other films while commenting on another film. I didn't care where on the list some of the movies or moments made it, it was just fun to watch. And you get introduced to films that you haven't seen before. And for me, I was reminded of old films that I had forgotten about. I started adding the films that they highlighted to my watch list. I recommend it.

This series, or any series that purports to review productions of this type, is filled with bogus opinions and conclusions. People who participate in the production, writing, directing, etc., of these types of films are selling "snake oil". Films of this genre are not special because of the content they exhibit. Some of these films are good, some are not. But anyone who assigns special qualities to these films in particular moments and describing them as terrific plots or acting, or directing is selling hypocrisy, among other questionable traits. These films are famous for one or two reasons: They are gross and they make money. The acting and the plot are inconsequential. They show blood, guts, horrific special effects and women with cute bodies and that's all; these qualities do not make them special in their impact on the audience. What about a hypothetical movie titled, "Vomitus"? Extraterrestrials land on Earth and spread a virus that causes people to vomit endlessly. They can't stop. They vomit until their stomachs are empty, then vomit their internal organs, then die. How's that for a scary plot? Would such a film be described as a terrific work of art? Would critics be thrilled to see the production value put into such a film? How about another hypothetical film titled, "Fecalmania"? Extraterrestrials land on Earth and spread a virus that causes people to relieve themselves non-stop until they die from losing their internal organs. Would the critics applaud the special effects and the acting in such a film? Of course they would. This is the horror genre at its next level. This is pushing the envelope. This is exploring the next dimension in storytelling. Critics would love the plot and acting in "Vomitus" and "Fecalmania". This is where the horror genre is headed. Won't audiences love the movie? The excitement, the fear, the tension, the vomit and the feces and the stench? Won't people line up to see the movies? Maybe even a second time. The acting would be superb! The plot would be superb! Wouldn't you want to see it, maybe twice? Imagine the endless scenes of people vomiting or people defecating. This is "Night of the Living Dead", only better, right? Of course! And how about the sequels? People who are forced to eat their own or someone else's vomit or feces! WOW! What a breakthrough! How soon can we see the them? Well, that's too long!