Pluribus

The moment i start watching,this series stands at 9.2.

Anything exceeding a 9 communicates this show enters GOAT territory,or its massively inflated and strongly subjected to hype and fandom.so when i see scores like this after just 2 episodes, i always get a little bit suspicious.

Regardless,I embraced this show with an immaculate open spirit, only knowing Seehorn stars,whom i tremendously appreciate.

After 2 episodes in now, i can already confidently guarantee you,this is nothing anywhere close of deserving anything near a 9.

People judging this,after just 2 episodes,as brilliant or masterpiece, and rated it to the same category as TV milestones like the Sopranos, Band of brothers or The wire,is wild...very,very wild

Im sure lots of people are going to have fun with it, but this is objectively absolutely not next level television, elevated story telling or anything smashing never seen before groundbreaking stuff you would associate with such insane ratings.

Also subjectively,for me the humor absolutely didn't work. Its just way too many poor attempts for utter meh jokes falling flat, undermining decent story developing. The show create big mystery ,but narrative wise does very little with it, the focus lies entirely on other more trivial and superficial things,the poor jokes is just one of many.

People having fun with this, that i get, but i put money this show is never going to keep up a score above 9 I wish anyone enjoying this lots of fun for the rest of the ride, but im out!

Sorry, just because it was written by Gilligan doesn't mean it will be as good or even better than BB or BCS. The hype surrounding it is absurd. Each episode is getting slower and more boring. The concept is very different and interesting but I would say it's average at best. It's a series that you'll put on the background whilst cooking.

I'm at episode 3 and the premise of this series is pretty interesting and the programmes are certainly well made with good production values, but my problem is that the main character is an utterly vile, horrible excuse for a human, and it's therefore almost impossible to engage with her. I find I'm constantly wondering why someone doesn't just kill her, and wishing that they would.

Quite where the story is going is hard to predict, but at times it feels some scenes are deliberately dragged to make the most of a set, where it would be better to just keep the story moving. Episode 3 is made up almost entirely of these unnecessarily long filler elements and really achieves very little, so why people are giving this a 10 is beyond me.

Unless you've got endless free time to fill, I'd skip this in favour of something better.

Two episodes in, I'm not sure what to think yet. The concept is original and there's definitely something interesting here, but as often happens with Vince Gilligan, it takes a long time to get moving. The slow-burn approach is intentional, yet at times it feels overly drawn out, and I caught myself skipping ahead during a few scenes that just lingered too long.

It looks great, the acting is solid, and the idea has real potential, but I'm struggling to feel fully engaged. I'm more curious than excited, and I still don't really see where the show is heading. It's not bad at all, just a bit too slow, occasionally dull, and not gripping enough from the start.

Hopefully it finds its rhythm.

The premise of the show is great , very intriguing and creates a great sense of expectation of future events.

However, the main character is just horrible, not the actress or her acting, but the character itself is such a horribly annoying person that is impossible to have any connection with her.

I am basically just waiting for her to stop complaining just so I can see what happens with the other guys , but she never stops her incessant self centered winning.

I see people comparing the show with Breaking Bad, but this is like if Marie was like 10 times more annoying and was the main character.

Overall I don't see how this show has a such high rating, doesn't really make sense.