Dans la Venise de l'après-guerre, Poirot, désormais à la retraite et vivant dans son propre exil, assiste à contrecœur à une séance de spiritisme.Dans la Venise de l'après-guerre, Poirot, désormais à la retraite et vivant dans son propre exil, assiste à contrecœur à une séance de spiritisme.Dans la Venise de l'après-guerre, Poirot, désormais à la retraite et vivant dans son propre exil, assiste à contrecœur à une séance de spiritisme.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Whereas the last two Branagh Agatha Christie adaptations were movies I sort of liked at first and started to realise were "meh" over time, this latest entry is one that I recognised as mediocre upon first viewing.
Granted, it was really refreshing to see that this time, the filmmakers clearly put effort into the locations and production design. The film looks authentic and gorgeous, as opposed to its predecessors that were over reliant on unnecessary CGI backgrounds.
The story does have some interesting ideas and compelling character interactions, but they unfortunately take a back seat half the time. For the other half, we get a lot of weak attempts at horror and red herring plot points that really do amount to nothing.
I don't know what happened with the performances, but half of them are pretty great and the others are...well, awful. The actors clearly didn't agree on what kind of movie they were in, with some thinking it ought to be straight drama and others thinking they should play it corny.
Like the previous films, this is a middling whodunnit, with all the rote machinations you expect from the genre, nothing shocking, nothing gripping, but nothing so bad as to tank the experience.
It's the definition of mediocre.
Granted, it was really refreshing to see that this time, the filmmakers clearly put effort into the locations and production design. The film looks authentic and gorgeous, as opposed to its predecessors that were over reliant on unnecessary CGI backgrounds.
The story does have some interesting ideas and compelling character interactions, but they unfortunately take a back seat half the time. For the other half, we get a lot of weak attempts at horror and red herring plot points that really do amount to nothing.
I don't know what happened with the performances, but half of them are pretty great and the others are...well, awful. The actors clearly didn't agree on what kind of movie they were in, with some thinking it ought to be straight drama and others thinking they should play it corny.
Like the previous films, this is a middling whodunnit, with all the rote machinations you expect from the genre, nothing shocking, nothing gripping, but nothing so bad as to tank the experience.
It's the definition of mediocre.
Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) has retired and is living in Venice where he is visited by his old friend Ariadne Oliver (Tina Fey) who asks him to come to a seance held in a palatial Venetian house by top medium played by Michelle Yeoh who is seeking to speak with the spirit of a girl who apparently killed herself jumping from the building. Oliver wants Poirot to expose Yeoh as a fraud or start believing in the afterlife. He attends and there is a murder.
Branagh's third go at a Poirot story and depending on your fondness for these things, potentially the best. It is very different from the previous 2 mysteries in that whilst the usual interviews and ripping up of alibis takes place, there is a very distinct supernatural element here, which may or may not be real. What Branagh does though is use this to create a much darker and decidedly well crafted spooky story (he should definitely make a straight ghost story) which is looking both for a murderer and proof that the ghostly bit is true or false. So whilst the gloss and usual extravagant beautifully dressed characters might be missing there is still a great mystery to enjoy. I hope he does another one.
Branagh's third go at a Poirot story and depending on your fondness for these things, potentially the best. It is very different from the previous 2 mysteries in that whilst the usual interviews and ripping up of alibis takes place, there is a very distinct supernatural element here, which may or may not be real. What Branagh does though is use this to create a much darker and decidedly well crafted spooky story (he should definitely make a straight ghost story) which is looking both for a murderer and proof that the ghostly bit is true or false. So whilst the gloss and usual extravagant beautifully dressed characters might be missing there is still a great mystery to enjoy. I hope he does another one.
A Haunting in Venice is the best of Kenneth Branagh's trilogy of Poirot adventures. This one being a smaller scale whodunit with a supernatural edge fixes any remaining issues whilst still being an engaging mystery with a satisfying answer to whodunit.
Kenneth Branagh is still endlessly entertaining as Hercule Poirot, the humour is toned down here due to the darker story and yet again he's grown as a character by the end. Each one has tested something different, first it was his morality then his humanity and here it's his sanity that is pushed to breaking point.
The cast is still undeniably star studded but still smaller than the predecessor which means no one goes unnoticed. Highlights include Tina Fey who makes for a great double act with Branagh's Poirot and Michelle Yeoh, given her best role in a Western film in ages (excluding EEAAO of course).
Mostly being confined to one smaller, interior heavy location, Branagh's direction is even better that what's come before. His trademark canted angles have never been more at home and even though the film isn't massively scary, Branagh is still able to craft some effectively uncomfortable moments.
Thanks to the location this franchise is finally free of the distracting CG that's been its biggest flaw. Being majority practical just makes the whole thing infinitely more immersive and means the stylish visual composition on display isn't having to make up for shoddy effects.
Kenneth Branagh is still endlessly entertaining as Hercule Poirot, the humour is toned down here due to the darker story and yet again he's grown as a character by the end. Each one has tested something different, first it was his morality then his humanity and here it's his sanity that is pushed to breaking point.
The cast is still undeniably star studded but still smaller than the predecessor which means no one goes unnoticed. Highlights include Tina Fey who makes for a great double act with Branagh's Poirot and Michelle Yeoh, given her best role in a Western film in ages (excluding EEAAO of course).
Mostly being confined to one smaller, interior heavy location, Branagh's direction is even better that what's come before. His trademark canted angles have never been more at home and even though the film isn't massively scary, Branagh is still able to craft some effectively uncomfortable moments.
Thanks to the location this franchise is finally free of the distracting CG that's been its biggest flaw. Being majority practical just makes the whole thing infinitely more immersive and means the stylish visual composition on display isn't having to make up for shoddy effects.
A Haunting in Venice is the third installment of Kenneth Branagh's adaptation of Agatha Christie's novels, featuring the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot. Set in post-World War II Venice, the film follows Poirot as he investigates a murder at a seance in a haunted palazzo, where he faces a surprise from his own past.
The film boasts an impressive cast, including Branagh himself as Poirot, Michelle Yeoh as the medium Joyce Reynolds, Jamie Dornan as the doctor Leslie Ferrier, Tina Fey as the mystery writer Ariadne Oliver, and Kelly Reilly as the opera singer Rowena Drake. However, none of the characters are likable or charming, and that makes it a bit challenging as the story requires a lot of patience. The film attempts to be eerie, but the camera work and the actors do not seem to be believable or convincing, despite its atmospheric setting and stellar location views of Venice.
The plot is loosely based on Christie's novel Hallowe'en Party, but with several changes and additions that make it more complex and modern. The film explores themes such as guilt, revenge, faith, and justice, and touches on the historical and social context of post-war Italy. The twist is detailed but not too convoluted, however, not very believable. The film also relies too much on CGI effects and jump scares, which undermine the suspense and mystery.
A Haunting in Venice is not a bad film, but it is not a great one either. It is a decent adaptation of Christie's work, but it lacks the charm and wit of the original. It is a film that tries to do too much, but fails to deliver on its promises. I liked it, but not very much. I gave it just a 6/10 rating.
The film boasts an impressive cast, including Branagh himself as Poirot, Michelle Yeoh as the medium Joyce Reynolds, Jamie Dornan as the doctor Leslie Ferrier, Tina Fey as the mystery writer Ariadne Oliver, and Kelly Reilly as the opera singer Rowena Drake. However, none of the characters are likable or charming, and that makes it a bit challenging as the story requires a lot of patience. The film attempts to be eerie, but the camera work and the actors do not seem to be believable or convincing, despite its atmospheric setting and stellar location views of Venice.
The plot is loosely based on Christie's novel Hallowe'en Party, but with several changes and additions that make it more complex and modern. The film explores themes such as guilt, revenge, faith, and justice, and touches on the historical and social context of post-war Italy. The twist is detailed but not too convoluted, however, not very believable. The film also relies too much on CGI effects and jump scares, which undermine the suspense and mystery.
A Haunting in Venice is not a bad film, but it is not a great one either. It is a decent adaptation of Christie's work, but it lacks the charm and wit of the original. It is a film that tries to do too much, but fails to deliver on its promises. I liked it, but not very much. I gave it just a 6/10 rating.
This was surprisingly spookier than I thought it would be but it was happily welcomed during this Halloween Season. It was spooky without being cheesy or goofy which is what a lot of traditional horror movies tend to lean towards. I saw it in theaters but can definitely see myself cuddling up on the couch with a hot chocolate and a blanket to watch this film in the autumn.
You can tell Tina Fey isn't used to playing more serious roles but she pulled it off enough. It was definitely a surprise to see her in this film, especially as such a large character.
I would love to see more Poirot in the future as Kenneth Branagh does a great job portraying him.
This film was a good length too. Not too long and not too short.
I'd recommend this to those who enjoy a little spook and mystery but not for anyone looking for light hearted Halloween fun.
You can tell Tina Fey isn't used to playing more serious roles but she pulled it off enough. It was definitely a surprise to see her in this film, especially as such a large character.
I would love to see more Poirot in the future as Kenneth Branagh does a great job portraying him.
This film was a good length too. Not too long and not too short.
I'd recommend this to those who enjoy a little spook and mystery but not for anyone looking for light hearted Halloween fun.
All About 'A Haunting in Venice'
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe screenplay is inspired by Dame Agatha Christie's 1969 novel "Hallowe'en Party," with the setting changed from the UK to Venice, Italy. This is not the first time that Hallowe'en Party was adapted to film. In July of 2011, ITV Studios and WGBH released an 89-minute feature length film adaptation, Hallowe'en Party (2010), starring David Suchet as Poirot.
- GaffesThe statue's hand upon which Ms. Reynolds is impaled should be covered with blood and gore, yet it is clean.
- Citations
Ariadne Oliver: Scary stories make real life a little less scary
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Épisode datant du 22 septembre 2023 (2023)
- Bandes originalesWhen the Lights Go on Again
Written by Bennie Benjamin, Sol Marcus and Eddie Seiler
Performed by Vera Lynn
Courtesy of Decca Music Group Limited
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is A Haunting in Venice?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Cacería En Venecia
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 60 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 42 471 412 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 14 279 529 $US
- 17 sept. 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 122 290 456 $US
- Durée
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant