NOTE IMDb
6,0/10
1,1 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTells the harrowing story of a woman trying to use Alabama's Stand Your Ground law after killing a man she says brutally attacked her.Tells the harrowing story of a woman trying to use Alabama's Stand Your Ground law after killing a man she says brutally attacked her.Tells the harrowing story of a woman trying to use Alabama's Stand Your Ground law after killing a man she says brutally attacked her.
Avis à la une
This is an extremely biased piece of work. It muddles an extremely complicated situation to conform to the author, and director's, narrative.
The author, Elizabeth Flock, has written about this case and made this poor piece of film. Rather than using the facts and details to tell the story, she is selective to the point of extreme bias and the utilises victimisation to try to support her point of view, such "there are no perfect victims", which there aren't, but that does not make it ok to try to frame information to shape your narrative.
Ultimately, there is no question that Brittany is a victim of abuse. That does not justify the crime she committed in this instance.
What was played down was the testimony Brittany gave, she lied and changed her story, this makes the ability to trust her account difficult. Additionally, McCallie came back to the house with a gun rather than informing the police, these are only a couple the facts totally played down by Flock.
Just read up on it, this particular case is not a "stand your ground is for white men" example and Elizabeth Flock is our looking for more of these cases now... no one ever seems to have explained let the evidence lead you to the outcome to her, she is clearly working backwards from an outcome.
The author, Elizabeth Flock, has written about this case and made this poor piece of film. Rather than using the facts and details to tell the story, she is selective to the point of extreme bias and the utilises victimisation to try to support her point of view, such "there are no perfect victims", which there aren't, but that does not make it ok to try to frame information to shape your narrative.
Ultimately, there is no question that Brittany is a victim of abuse. That does not justify the crime she committed in this instance.
What was played down was the testimony Brittany gave, she lied and changed her story, this makes the ability to trust her account difficult. Additionally, McCallie came back to the house with a gun rather than informing the police, these are only a couple the facts totally played down by Flock.
Just read up on it, this particular case is not a "stand your ground is for white men" example and Elizabeth Flock is our looking for more of these cases now... no one ever seems to have explained let the evidence lead you to the outcome to her, she is clearly working backwards from an outcome.
It's clear from the start that this documentary is trying to push a narrative. This would be fine if they told the whole story, and had a strong case for that.
The details they left in and inconsistencies they tried to explain away muddied up that narrative as well as implying that the female judge had something against women.
The details they left out, which I looked up after watching this, make it very clear that this isn't a simple stand-your-ground case, as this documentary claims. This made me feel like I wasted 40 minutes on falsehoods.
I watched a 15 min breakdown by Dr. Todd Grande on YouTube on this case, and learned more than watching this.
In retrospect, she is very lucky with the plea they offered her.
The details they left in and inconsistencies they tried to explain away muddied up that narrative as well as implying that the female judge had something against women.
The details they left out, which I looked up after watching this, make it very clear that this isn't a simple stand-your-ground case, as this documentary claims. This made me feel like I wasted 40 minutes on falsehoods.
I watched a 15 min breakdown by Dr. Todd Grande on YouTube on this case, and learned more than watching this.
In retrospect, she is very lucky with the plea they offered her.
8pfne
Living in the UK as I do, only came across this case / story through Netflix late one Sunday night.
I enjoy true crime stories so impressed play.
At a run time of about 40 minutes, it doesn't delve too deep, but it interviews the important people on the case including Brittany herself.
What a woman she is. What a nightmare she's lived through. What a strength she has.
The law, it is said, is an ass, in this case, the judiciary of Alabama should be hanging their heads in shame. Brittany didn't deserve this, they know she didn't, why else offer more time for Manslaughter than for murder? They wanted her convicted for murder.
If she felt a new life in the UK was for her, she'd be welcome at mine for a pot of tea and a biscuit.
I enjoy true crime stories so impressed play.
At a run time of about 40 minutes, it doesn't delve too deep, but it interviews the important people on the case including Brittany herself.
What a woman she is. What a nightmare she's lived through. What a strength she has.
The law, it is said, is an ass, in this case, the judiciary of Alabama should be hanging their heads in shame. Brittany didn't deserve this, they know she didn't, why else offer more time for Manslaughter than for murder? They wanted her convicted for murder.
If she felt a new life in the UK was for her, she'd be welcome at mine for a pot of tea and a biscuit.
This was a simple story; not a fantastical one. Told respectfully. The fact the prosecutor and the judge declined comment, meant this could only be told this far. The take-away from watching this is that the judicial system in Alabama is still heavily prejudice towards women (and as stated, towards minority groups).
I found this an honest portrayal of life for communities, that suffer the ills of neglect and financial hardship. Banality and rampant drug abuse - a common source for this self destruction that leads to the penal system mill; is a forever told story, but one that never ceases to draw attention and doesn't appear to want to fix itself. Selfish, tired and old; this kind of governance eats it's young and tube feeds it's corrupt establishment. This is the story of a broken system with it's pitiful outcome.
Leaves you empty but how else to tell it.
I found this an honest portrayal of life for communities, that suffer the ills of neglect and financial hardship. Banality and rampant drug abuse - a common source for this self destruction that leads to the penal system mill; is a forever told story, but one that never ceases to draw attention and doesn't appear to want to fix itself. Selfish, tired and old; this kind of governance eats it's young and tube feeds it's corrupt establishment. This is the story of a broken system with it's pitiful outcome.
Leaves you empty but how else to tell it.
A completely one-sided and biased presentation with the usual sparse case facts that is common with a low budget Netflix documentary. The documentary is so frustratingly one-sided that you find yourself shaking your head as to the point of the film. Little to no information is given surrounding the event. A ridiculous small amount of time is given to detailing the crime scene. No explanation of the court proceedings. This entire documentary is a showcase for the supposed racist and gender biases in the Stand Your Ground law of Alabama and across the United States. Perhaps there is a compelling story in this extremely poorly presented Netflix documentary... but seemingly no one felt the need to make the effort to do so.
Le saviez-vous
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Stand Her Ground
- Lieux de tournage
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 40min
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant