Hoax: The Kidnapping of Sherri Papini

What or whose perspective is this story? The public? The husband? The direction of the story appears to shift blame to an inattentive husband. He over reacts, underreacts, seems wooden- offish. She a woman described as 'perfect' 'vivacious', 'energetic' 'put together', is portrayed as someone who would be described as dull, disheveled, is conveyed so differently-"depressed, Bored, abused, on the verge of a breakdown?" There is little to no depiction of the torture her husband endured, nor is there empathy.

Don't waste your time.

It's not the acting as eluded to in a previous review. It's the story arc. There's no point of view, no empathy, & the personalities too off.

Sherri Papini (Jaime King) is stressed trying to be the perfect wife to Keith (Matt Hamilton) and the perfect mother to her two kids. She has a contentious relationship with her mother. She is out jogging in the park when she's taken. It's actually her ex Chris (Josh Collins) and she's a cooperating partner. The kidnapping becomes big news and a big police search. Sherri and Chris orchestrates her supposed escape from two Hispanic women. Years later, her story falls apart.

I remember this case although I didn't remember the old boyfriend. For whatever reason, this Lifetime movie feels flat. I had hopes that I would love Jaime King's performance. She's always been great fun. This role is different and she's almost robotic. I never get a sense of her character. Also, the story is known from the start and none of it holds any surprise. All of it adds up to a flat telling of the story.

Whoever directed this movie missed a lot of key points, from what really happened. When Keith found her phone, he said he took a picture before picking it up. In this movie he said I didn't touch anything and left it on the ground. When Sherri was kidnapped and returned home, her hair was cut short, she shackled herself up with zip ties, chains and locks in the back of the truck, prior to being dropped off. Also she had bangs. Also the acting was horrific, I'm not an actor, but I thought the acting was done poorly. So badly written! I'm completely disappointed. I give it 0 stars, I wasted time that I can't get back.

I came here to talk about what a tragedy this feeble LMN attempt at storytelling was, between the terrible acting and the universal blandness, but what you need to do is go look at the VERY comprehensive review from back on 2/19/23 by goodpatron23. They nailed EVERYTHING I had to say and then some - - and with almost-perfect grammar, etc., so I have nothing to add except like I said above -- don't bother. (It has been my experience that ever since Lifetime went Canadian, it has gone tremendously downhill in terms of quality with regard to Lifetime movies. I just don't think the CBC filmmaking standards are the same.)

I was pretty excited to watch this film. Like much of America, I was fascinated by this bizarre, true story we witnessed in the news. Disappointingly this lifetime production was a. Dull retelling.

Even being based on a true story, it is typical in such films that liberties are taken, parts are exaggerated, and facts are changed. However, it seemed that this was unnecessarily done here; and worse, doing so actually took away from the story, rather than adding to it, as is usually intended.

For instance, legitimate details in the interviews and conversations we see/are all privy to online were altered, which made me question more of the film itself...and including them would've actually made the production more interesting!

I found Jamie King, the woman who portrayed Sherri, pretty dull and monotone, though she did at times capture Sherri's anxiety, deflection, and manipulative behavior.

There were a few times where some scenes were rushed or perhaps overedited, which only exacerbated viewer confusion AND boredom. It seemed apparent that this film had little-to-no cooperation from those actually involved In the ordeal. I'm sure that not many were cooperative, most especially Sherri herself, but it seemed so impersonal and amateurly crafted. There were moments where it was lightly comedic, and of course sad in theory, but even then and overall It lacked real soul. There is debate about whether or not the husband was at all aware before the conclusion of the investigation, but certainly their kids weren't; yet I found it difficult to be very sympathetic to anyone here.

The whole story/format felt rushed, and dare I say- after four+ years of that ridiculous case- even rushed to the screen. Like it felt a bit premature. I found the 1.5-hour recording of the concluding police interview online to be more intriguing than this movie of the same length. Perhaps after more time, those personally involved would be a bit more informative, thereby providing a more detailed telling, about which we could muster more understanding and compassion/empathy. Instead, I was actually ready for it to end.