Sarzameen
- 2025
- 2h 17min
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn Army officer will stop at nothing to free Kashmir valley from terrorism, even if it means paying a terrible price.An Army officer will stop at nothing to free Kashmir valley from terrorism, even if it means paying a terrible price.An Army officer will stop at nothing to free Kashmir valley from terrorism, even if it means paying a terrible price.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
I watched the movie Sarzameen. In my opinion, it's a decent movie to watch. The storyline and scenes are quite predictable. The second half brings some excitement, but by the end, it feels like a movie that's good to watch-nothing extraordinary. The lead actor's performance is good. Overall, I would rate it around 5.5 out of 10.
Review: Sarzameen 1.5/5
Sarzameen is a cinematic autopsy of what happens when a powerful premise is murdered by weak writing, hollow emotion, and a complete disconnect from truth. It doesn't move you, it doesn't disturb you-it just leaves you cold and disappointed.
A story that had the potential to explore identity, pain, and the deep scars of conflict instead becomes a confused mess of half-baked dialogue, implausible decisions, and characters who feel more like cardboard than flesh. Even Kajol, with her immense depth, is utterly wasted here. The emotional stakes are spoken of, but never felt. The performances float without weight, and the narrative-built on a critical revelation-falls apart under the simplest scrutiny.
When a supposed twist rests on a DNA test in a region soaked in surveillance and tension, you expect precision. Instead, we get melodrama over meaning. The script treats its audience as passive observers, never inviting them to engage, only to endure.
Cinema like this does more harm than good-because it pretends to speak truth, but it whispers fiction dressed as depth.
A missed opportunity. A wasted canvas. A story that deserved so much more.
Sarzameen is a cinematic autopsy of what happens when a powerful premise is murdered by weak writing, hollow emotion, and a complete disconnect from truth. It doesn't move you, it doesn't disturb you-it just leaves you cold and disappointed.
A story that had the potential to explore identity, pain, and the deep scars of conflict instead becomes a confused mess of half-baked dialogue, implausible decisions, and characters who feel more like cardboard than flesh. Even Kajol, with her immense depth, is utterly wasted here. The emotional stakes are spoken of, but never felt. The performances float without weight, and the narrative-built on a critical revelation-falls apart under the simplest scrutiny.
When a supposed twist rests on a DNA test in a region soaked in surveillance and tension, you expect precision. Instead, we get melodrama over meaning. The script treats its audience as passive observers, never inviting them to engage, only to endure.
Cinema like this does more harm than good-because it pretends to speak truth, but it whispers fiction dressed as depth.
A missed opportunity. A wasted canvas. A story that deserved so much more.
A movie which claims itself to be patriotic fail to deliver patriotism. It shows how a military man is emotionally driven which is totally opposite also harman who is a terrorist is not killed just because he is the son of military man. Is there any mean of the movie?
Producer and Writer must be answerable for the script...
Producer and Writer must be answerable for the script...
The much-hyped Sarzameen, a film that promised a gripping, high-stakes socio-political thriller, arrives with a resounding thud rather than a roar. Instead of a tense and immersive experience, viewers are left with a tedious, formulaic mess that struggles to justify its lengthy runtime. It's a cinematic misstep that fails on almost every conceivable level.
The primary issue lies in the convoluted and deeply unoriginal script. The narrative feels less like a finely tuned clock and more like a collection of discarded plot points awkwardly stitched together. The central mystery is so heavily telegraphed in the first act that any semblance of surprise is lost long before the climax. Subplots involving a generic family drama and a shoehorned romance not only fail to land but actively detract from the already weak main story. The pacing is glacial, with key moments stretched out to the point of exhaustion and crucial emotional beats completely glossed over, leaving the audience feeling detached and bored.
Compounding these script issues are the uninspired performances. The lead actor, often celebrated for their intensity, seems to be going through the motions here, delivering dialogue with a flat, monotonous tone. Their character lacks any real depth or motivation, making it impossible to root for them. The supporting cast fares no better, with many characters existing solely as exposition dumps or as archetypes who react in predictably clichéd ways. The palpable lack of chemistry between the leads makes their romantic arc feel entirely unearned and out of place, serving only to halt the plot's already stuttering momentum.
The direction is equally pedestrian. The camera work is static and uninspired, doing little to build tension or atmosphere. The film's washed-out color palette makes every scene feel drab and unengaging. The director appears content to rely on slow-motion shots and an overbearing background score to convey importance, rather than trusting the story or the actors to do so. In the end, Sarzameen is a monumental disappointment-a film that's neither thrilling nor emotionally resonant. Save your time and money; this "land" is not worth visiting.
The primary issue lies in the convoluted and deeply unoriginal script. The narrative feels less like a finely tuned clock and more like a collection of discarded plot points awkwardly stitched together. The central mystery is so heavily telegraphed in the first act that any semblance of surprise is lost long before the climax. Subplots involving a generic family drama and a shoehorned romance not only fail to land but actively detract from the already weak main story. The pacing is glacial, with key moments stretched out to the point of exhaustion and crucial emotional beats completely glossed over, leaving the audience feeling detached and bored.
Compounding these script issues are the uninspired performances. The lead actor, often celebrated for their intensity, seems to be going through the motions here, delivering dialogue with a flat, monotonous tone. Their character lacks any real depth or motivation, making it impossible to root for them. The supporting cast fares no better, with many characters existing solely as exposition dumps or as archetypes who react in predictably clichéd ways. The palpable lack of chemistry between the leads makes their romantic arc feel entirely unearned and out of place, serving only to halt the plot's already stuttering momentum.
The direction is equally pedestrian. The camera work is static and uninspired, doing little to build tension or atmosphere. The film's washed-out color palette makes every scene feel drab and unengaging. The director appears content to rely on slow-motion shots and an overbearing background score to convey importance, rather than trusting the story or the actors to do so. In the end, Sarzameen is a monumental disappointment-a film that's neither thrilling nor emotionally resonant. Save your time and money; this "land" is not worth visiting.
This film presents a frustrating paradox. On one hand, it is a visual masterpiece, featuring absolutely beautiful and well-composed frame shots that could easily be mistaken for good storyline. The cinematography is, without a doubt, the high point of the entire production.
However, a film cannot survive on visuals alone. The sole spark of life in the narrative comes from Kajol. She is the only believable part of a story that otherwise feels completely empty.
2 Stars extra for Kajol
It's a real shame, then, that the rest of the movie falls apart because it has nothing to say. The plot is empty and feels forced, with other characters so poorly written you barely notice them. To have such a great main actress and such amazing visuals wasted on a story this dull is not just disappointing, it's very annoying. You are left with no feelings for the story, just the clear, irritating feeling that you watched two hours of a wasted chance. See it for Kajol if you have to, but don't say I didn't warn you.
However, a film cannot survive on visuals alone. The sole spark of life in the narrative comes from Kajol. She is the only believable part of a story that otherwise feels completely empty.
2 Stars extra for Kajol
It's a real shame, then, that the rest of the movie falls apart because it has nothing to say. The plot is empty and feels forced, with other characters so poorly written you barely notice them. To have such a great main actress and such amazing visuals wasted on a story this dull is not just disappointing, it's very annoying. You are left with no feelings for the story, just the clear, irritating feeling that you watched two hours of a wasted chance. See it for Kajol if you have to, but don't say I didn't warn you.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn 1991, Saif Ali Khan was supposed to make her debut opposite Kajol in Bekhudi, he had even shot for few days but later dropped off. Years later his son Ibrahim also making his debut with Kajol in his film
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Sarzameen?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 2h 17min(137 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant