Après qu'un signal d'aide soit parvenu à la Terre depuis un vaisseau de recherche, l'U.S. Space Force envoie un vaisseau de sauvetage sur Pandora, une lune de Saturne.Après qu'un signal d'aide soit parvenu à la Terre depuis un vaisseau de recherche, l'U.S. Space Force envoie un vaisseau de sauvetage sur Pandora, une lune de Saturne.Après qu'un signal d'aide soit parvenu à la Terre depuis un vaisseau de recherche, l'U.S. Space Force envoie un vaisseau de sauvetage sur Pandora, une lune de Saturne.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Mark Ricketson
- Dr. Cliff Ryan
- (as Mark Andrew Ricketson)
Avis à la une
I watches this on SCI FI channel. These days they only show crap like this.
First let me say that actors did do ok. Camera work was also ok. And effects ware also good for B movie. I saw worse. That is why I gave it 3 star.
Now I know it is mockbuster of the Abyss and Avatar franchise but they could try a bit better.
I really hate neoprene bondage-lite suits, pipes from walmart, sportbike gloves....and that should be space suit? And they glow blue when healty, red when not healty...They look stupid.
Not to mention script. Dialog is crazy. Let me make an example. On the planet after shooting: "we have armor piercing holow points". WTF? When it comes to bullets hollow point bullet and armor piercing are exactly the oppsite. Who write this stuff and why??? It is just pointless.
And why not use some interesting looking modern real guns insted of stupid things that they used in the movie. In combination with Walmart made suits and cheap effect plus bad writing it was fiasco that even actors could not save.
Most actors did try the best. Respect to them. They did good. But you cant do magic with bad script and crapy music.
First let me say that actors did do ok. Camera work was also ok. And effects ware also good for B movie. I saw worse. That is why I gave it 3 star.
Now I know it is mockbuster of the Abyss and Avatar franchise but they could try a bit better.
I really hate neoprene bondage-lite suits, pipes from walmart, sportbike gloves....and that should be space suit? And they glow blue when healty, red when not healty...They look stupid.
Not to mention script. Dialog is crazy. Let me make an example. On the planet after shooting: "we have armor piercing holow points". WTF? When it comes to bullets hollow point bullet and armor piercing are exactly the oppsite. Who write this stuff and why??? It is just pointless.
And why not use some interesting looking modern real guns insted of stupid things that they used in the movie. In combination with Walmart made suits and cheap effect plus bad writing it was fiasco that even actors could not save.
Most actors did try the best. Respect to them. They did good. But you cant do magic with bad script and crapy music.
I can only imagine that anyone having anything to do with this abomination and actually releasing it upon the American public is currently seeking out a deep dark remote part of this world to hide in shame, remorse and the deep guilt one would undoubtely feel after creating something such as this and calling it a "Movie".
If you paid for this garbage, you have been legally mugged.
Most of the actors are young and have a chance for redemption providing their families, friends and the movie industry acknowledge their existence again.
The older actors no longer care or have any pride in their trade knowing the fact that the American people are being dumbed down enogh to accept this rubbish and just shut up.
Hopefully I didn't hurt anyone's feeeeliiingsss.
If you paid for this garbage, you have been legally mugged.
Most of the actors are young and have a chance for redemption providing their families, friends and the movie industry acknowledge their existence again.
The older actors no longer care or have any pride in their trade knowing the fact that the American people are being dumbed down enogh to accept this rubbish and just shut up.
Hopefully I didn't hurt anyone's feeeeliiingsss.
And then I see the space suits. But let me tell you the good part first. The actual introduction and the credits was very nice. And some of the buildings and things on the ground and the special effects were so so. However those spacesuits.
I felt like I was watching Lost in Space or something. Maybe Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea?
I'm sure there's some good looking space suits, in a movie supply house somewhere. Aside from that it wasn't so bad. I mean hey they're dealing with limited budget I understand that.
But simple things like camera angles and such could have been better. Once they got inside it went much better. But before then it looked like they were in the some Lagoon somewhere. Hey I'll give him an A+ for effort.
I felt like I was watching Lost in Space or something. Maybe Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea?
I'm sure there's some good looking space suits, in a movie supply house somewhere. Aside from that it wasn't so bad. I mean hey they're dealing with limited budget I understand that.
But simple things like camera angles and such could have been better. Once they got inside it went much better. But before then it looked like they were in the some Lagoon somewhere. Hey I'll give him an A+ for effort.
Arvidmslusarczyk states that Pandora, which is a moon, cannot look like a planet, such as Earth. This is incorrect. A great example would be Saturn's moon Titan. Titan has a strong atmosphere and a surface with lakes and rivers. No plant life because of the freezing temperatures but could be possible in the future.
Also, mproffesa giving this film a 9/10 doesn't help this film. It is not a 9/10 in any shape or form, and that's fine. I've seen limited budget films that didn't attempt to be more than they were while simultaneously givng a moral viewpoint based on the limitation of its budget(s). The poor costuming and set designs could have been overlooked by many if the dialogue was actually accurate within the subject matter in which they are speaking about. Dialogue, in such regard, is more important than those two things. The film, as a whole: says nothing. It's overdramatic, poor acting, set design, costuming; and all that together creates a boring atmosphere. It's an insult to give it a 9/10, and just makes people think you worked on the film or friends with filmmaker(s).
It's a skip for most.
Also, mproffesa giving this film a 9/10 doesn't help this film. It is not a 9/10 in any shape or form, and that's fine. I've seen limited budget films that didn't attempt to be more than they were while simultaneously givng a moral viewpoint based on the limitation of its budget(s). The poor costuming and set designs could have been overlooked by many if the dialogue was actually accurate within the subject matter in which they are speaking about. Dialogue, in such regard, is more important than those two things. The film, as a whole: says nothing. It's overdramatic, poor acting, set design, costuming; and all that together creates a boring atmosphere. It's an insult to give it a 9/10, and just makes people think you worked on the film or friends with filmmaker(s).
It's a skip for most.
I opted to watch the 2022 sci-fi movie "Battle for Pandora" solely because I had the chance to sit down and watch a movie that I hadn't already seen.
I have to say that it wasn't a movie that I was harboring any expectations to, as it was a movie from The Asylum and it had Tom Sizemore as the billed actor on the cover.
Yet I opted to give director Noah Luke's 2022 movie a fair chance.
I found "Battle for Pandora" to be a movie that fell entirely short of entertaining me. The storyline, as written by writers Rolfe Kanefsky and Joe Roche, was a rather trivial, mundane and boring one, and the effects in the movie were dubious.
The acting performances in the movie were adequate enough, I suppose. I wasn't really impressed with what I saw. But then again, the actors and actresses didn't really have all that much to work with.
My lack of general interest in the sci-fi genre didn't exactly help to win me over here either.
My rating of "Battle for Pandora" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
I have to say that it wasn't a movie that I was harboring any expectations to, as it was a movie from The Asylum and it had Tom Sizemore as the billed actor on the cover.
Yet I opted to give director Noah Luke's 2022 movie a fair chance.
I found "Battle for Pandora" to be a movie that fell entirely short of entertaining me. The storyline, as written by writers Rolfe Kanefsky and Joe Roche, was a rather trivial, mundane and boring one, and the effects in the movie were dubious.
The acting performances in the movie were adequate enough, I suppose. I wasn't really impressed with what I saw. But then again, the actors and actresses didn't really have all that much to work with.
My lack of general interest in the sci-fi genre didn't exactly help to win me over here either.
My rating of "Battle for Pandora" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Battle for Pandora?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant