L'histoire d'un officier de marine jugé pour mutinerie après avoir pris le commandement d'un capitaine de navire qu'il juge instable et qui met en danger le navire et son équipage.L'histoire d'un officier de marine jugé pour mutinerie après avoir pris le commandement d'un capitaine de navire qu'il juge instable et qui met en danger le navire et son équipage.L'histoire d'un officier de marine jugé pour mutinerie après avoir pris le commandement d'un capitaine de navire qu'il juge instable et qui met en danger le navire et son équipage.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 nominations au total
- Captain Davis
- (non crédité)
- Military Officer
- (non crédité)
- Lieutenant Emily
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
It was refreshingly taut, and my gut was taut as well during the entire production.....bravo on that point. When these types of proceedings occur, people's lives are irretrievably altered...whether for good or ill.
And the lack of music was awesome! Real life has no soundtrack......
I thought the lighting was accurate, and the whole atmosphere felt like something large was going to happen....whether that was going to be good...or bad....we don't know....
As a lawyer, I was pleased that the objections and decisions by the court were pretty accurate.
Final verdict? We could all benefit from more productions in this sphere...well done.
If you are expecting a clone of "A Few Good Men" you will be disappointed. However this is a story of the trial as a stand-alone event, that benefits from a solid ensemble cast. The late Lance Reddick in one of his last roles, was particularly memorable as the chief justice, and Kiefer Sutherland deftly navigates both Queeg's power and vulnerability on the stand.
I strongly, I strongly encourage you to mute the movie at the start of the credits to maintain the tension of the final scene, and I encourage you to see both this and the 1954 version of this story.
This is a single setting courtroom court martial hearing that expands on the legal themes of the original from the fifties.
The original showed the various incidents of Queeg and then the trial. This is just the trial and aftermath.
Everything is a lot more fleshed out. Jason Clarke is great as the prosecutor and Keifer Sutherland does a passable Borgart homage.
I watched it as a companion piece to the original and would recommend doing it that way.
I always find the ending, where the solicitor speaks to the officers party a wonderful scene. Watch it for that at least.
It's a strong cast with Jake Lacy as the accused, Maryk, Monica Raymund as the Prosecutor and Kiefer Sutherland as Commander Queeg. Sutherland occasionally overplays the neurosis, but it's a good performance. Jason Clarke as the Defense counsel, Greenwald, is superb.
The late Lance Reddick plays Blakely the head Judge. It was nice to see Reddick get a full card dedication at the end of the picture*. A double dedication in this case, along with Friedkin, certainly. It's appropriate in a way that Friedkin would finish with a legal thriller, as his breakthrough was a hard-hitting 1962 crime Documentary The People Vs. Paul Crump.
I feel privileged to have met both men. A hearty RIP to each of them.
* Apparently, there are a couple of more performances by Reddick still to be released.
Right out of the gate, the pace of the movie was off. Cut scene to each witness, no time spend on any transition between them.
Then there's the scene with Lt Keefer. The original movie provided a clear understanding of his motives. In this one the Keefer and Maryk dynamic during the trial is not explored. No dots connected for the viewer, just a simple glazed over opportunity to develop the story.
The final scene left me puzzled. The message it sends is diminished from the takeaway of the original. Moral courage and fortitude are nowhere to be found. Maryk is made to be a one dimensional buffoon.
9/10 for the actors, 4/10 for the message and muddled delivery.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAccording to Guillermo del Toro, who served as a back-up director (due to insurance purposes), the late director William Friedkin was given 15 days to complete the shooting. He had finished shooting at the 14th day.
- GaffesThe President of the Board of Court Martial was a navy captain. Sitting to his left, as a member of the court, was an officer wearing the stripes of a Rear Admiral. In a military court martial the senior officer is automatically the President.
- Citations
Challee: Sir, the witness is obviously and understandably agitated by this ordeal and I request a recess to give him a breathing space.
Lieutenant Commander Phillip Queeg: I'm not agitated in the least. I'm glad to answer any and all questions. In fact, I-I demand the opportunity to set the record straight for any derogatory statements made about me in testimony that's gone before. I didn't make a single mistake in the 15 months I was aboard the Caine, and I-I can prove it. I've had a spotless record up until now and I don't want it being discredited by these lies and distortions told by these disloyal officers.
Captain Luther Blakely: Commander, would you like a recess?
Lieutenant Commander Phillip Queeg: Certainly not. In fact, if I had any say in this, I would ask there be no recess.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 921: Godzilla Minus One (2023)
- Bandes originalesLowdown
Written by Boz Scaggs and David Paich
Published by Boz Scaggs Music (GMR) administered by Concord Global Music (GMR) and Hudmar Publishing Co. Inc. c/o Spirit Four Music Crescendo
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 48 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1