NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
25 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Richa Amberr
- Reporter
- (as Richa Ambar)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Fukrey 3' garners mixed opinions, with many praising its humor, cast chemistry, and continuation of beloved antics. Fans appreciate the comedic timing and light-hearted nature. However, critics argue the film lacks a coherent plot, with absurd scenarios straining credibility. Complaints about the weak script and diminishing quality compared to earlier installments arise. Some viewers find the humor forced and the movie disappointing, suggesting the franchise should have ended earlier.
Avis à la une
Can't make you laugh. You wait till the end of movie and it doesn't come. Conclusion:
"Drenched in Regret" is a perfect example of how not to make a film. Its lackluster storyline, poor acting, and failed attempts at humor leave audiences feeling like they've been caught in a never-ending rainstorm of disappointment. Perhaps it's best to leave this movie shipwrecked and seek out something that won't make you regret spending your time and money on it.am left with no choice but to give it a dismal 1-star rating. The poor story, abysmal acting, and unfunny jokes all contribute to this sinking ship of a movie.
The movie will seem a bit haphazardly compiled from 2nd quarter. Flashback scenes take a lot of screentime. Whereas main story don't get enough time to have a proper buildup.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
Utter garbage it is. Not anywhere close the first two parts. It's very disgusting at most part of movie as it's all around susu, potty, G dhona, toilet water and what not (Literally). This one has no story, and goes here and there haywire. Too loud in some parts.
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres. Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres. Don't go in theatre even not worthy to watch on OTT platform, inplace of that spent your time to watch other OTT shows, atleast don't spoil your weekend or your 3hrs of the day excluding your travel time to theatres.
The third installment of the successful comedy franchise Fukrey struggles to retain the charm of Fukrey (2013) and Fukrey Returns (2017) and hasn't been able to live up to the expectations. Mrighdeep Singh Lamba's direction was average and he was not able to deliver a compelling slapstick comedy this time due to its thin plot and mediocre writing.
The first half of the film starts off well and it has some entertaining moments that give several occasions of laughter. But the second half becomes a victim of lazy writing and it is comparatively less on humour & the witty one-liners rarely land. Then the story goes off-track and tries to showcase a serious issue of water supply in Delhi and also it has a disappointing climax too. After a point, the screenplay won't be able to hold viewers and humour also gets repetitive.
Varun Sharma in his tailor-made role as Choochaa and Pankaj Tripathi as Pandit ji delivers an entertaining performance. Both the actors keep the audience engaged with their impeccable comic timing. Pulkit Samrat and Manjot Singh were decent in their roles. Richa Chadha shines again as Bholi Punjaban and gave a good performance. All other supporting actors were just fine in their respective roles.
Direction 2.5/5 Acting 3/5 Dialogues 3/5 Story 2/5 Screenplay 2/5.
The first half of the film starts off well and it has some entertaining moments that give several occasions of laughter. But the second half becomes a victim of lazy writing and it is comparatively less on humour & the witty one-liners rarely land. Then the story goes off-track and tries to showcase a serious issue of water supply in Delhi and also it has a disappointing climax too. After a point, the screenplay won't be able to hold viewers and humour also gets repetitive.
Varun Sharma in his tailor-made role as Choochaa and Pankaj Tripathi as Pandit ji delivers an entertaining performance. Both the actors keep the audience engaged with their impeccable comic timing. Pulkit Samrat and Manjot Singh were decent in their roles. Richa Chadha shines again as Bholi Punjaban and gave a good performance. All other supporting actors were just fine in their respective roles.
Direction 2.5/5 Acting 3/5 Dialogues 3/5 Story 2/5 Screenplay 2/5.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRicha Chaddha's character Bholi Punjaban's name is revealed to be Phoolkumari Sehgal.
- Bandes originalesVe Fukrey
Shabbir Ahmed
Dev Negi, Romy & Asees Kaur
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Fukrey 3?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 50 ₹ (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 583 921 $US
- Durée
- 2h 27min(147 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant