The Unbinding
- 2023
- 1h 38min
NOTE IMDb
5,1/10
1,2 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAfter finding a strange statue in the Catskills, hikers become the target of chilling paranormal phenomena. As the activity escalates, occult researchers Greg and Dana Newkirk are called to ... Tout lireAfter finding a strange statue in the Catskills, hikers become the target of chilling paranormal phenomena. As the activity escalates, occult researchers Greg and Dana Newkirk are called to uncover the truth behind the haunted artifact.After finding a strange statue in the Catskills, hikers become the target of chilling paranormal phenomena. As the activity escalates, occult researchers Greg and Dana Newkirk are called to uncover the truth behind the haunted artifact.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Résumé
Reviewers say 'The Unbinding' delves into paranormal investigation, witchcraft, and haunted objects, promoting curiosity and respect. The documentary is lauded for its unique approach, compelling storytelling, and high production values. Critics appreciate the Newkirks' compassionate methodology, distinguishing it from sensational shows. However, some reviewers doubt the documentary's claims and evidence, raising questions about its credibility. Despite mixed views on its factual accuracy, 'The Unbinding' is generally admired for its engaging narrative and thought-provoking themes.
Avis à la une
If it weren't for the fact that it is a blatant attempt to draw susceptible wanna believes to their other content, if it wasn't for the fact that the production value and continuity is so poor, if it wasn't for the fact that the script is so weak, it could have been a good plot for a comedy.
Unfortunately it fails on every level, I did laugh out loud at a couple of the absurd moments in the film but I probably wasn't meant to.
What on earth were you thinking? You should not be making films, you should not be writing scripts and you certainly shouldn't be acting in them.
I have experienced many paranormal events and seen many inexplicable things during my life. This film makes a complete mockery of a rather more serious subject and may actually push people away from wanting to find out the truth.
Dong do it again, it is just a cynical exercise.
Unfortunately it fails on every level, I did laugh out loud at a couple of the absurd moments in the film but I probably wasn't meant to.
What on earth were you thinking? You should not be making films, you should not be writing scripts and you certainly shouldn't be acting in them.
I have experienced many paranormal events and seen many inexplicable things during my life. This film makes a complete mockery of a rather more serious subject and may actually push people away from wanting to find out the truth.
Dong do it again, it is just a cynical exercise.
By no stretch of the imagination is this a documentary, not journalism, not contemporaneously filmed, no suggestion that it is fact, no evidence to demonstrate or support the idea that it is fact.
It reminds me of the mockumentary style of the drowned man by Markiplier or some other similar efforts.
If it weren't for the fact that it is a blatant attempt to draw susceptible wanna believes to their other content, if it wasn't for the fact that the production value and continuity is so poor, if it wasn't for the fact that the script is so weak, it could have been a good plot for a comedy.
Unfortunately it fails on every level, I did laugh out loud at a couple of the absurd moments in the film but I probably wasn't meant to.
What on earth were you thinking? You should not be making films, you should not be writing scripts and you certainly shouldn't be acting in them.
I have experienced many paranormal events and seen many inexplicable things during my life. This film makes a complete mockery of a rather more serious subject and may actually push people away from wanting to find out the truth.
Dong do it again, it is just a cynical exercise.
It reminds me of the mockumentary style of the drowned man by Markiplier or some other similar efforts.
If it weren't for the fact that it is a blatant attempt to draw susceptible wanna believes to their other content, if it wasn't for the fact that the production value and continuity is so poor, if it wasn't for the fact that the script is so weak, it could have been a good plot for a comedy.
Unfortunately it fails on every level, I did laugh out loud at a couple of the absurd moments in the film but I probably wasn't meant to.
What on earth were you thinking? You should not be making films, you should not be writing scripts and you certainly shouldn't be acting in them.
I have experienced many paranormal events and seen many inexplicable things during my life. This film makes a complete mockery of a rather more serious subject and may actually push people away from wanting to find out the truth.
Dong do it again, it is just a cynical exercise.
I enjoyed it. I was hesitant after reading the negative reviews, but I'm glad I watched it. In some ways, this is a typical ghost hunting "documentary" - meaning, of course there's no evidence. Some reviewers seemed surprised there's no irrefutable proof of ghosts here. There never is - there's no scientific peer reviewed journal about to publish a paper on ghosts. You can't prove gods or ghosts are real, that's the root of people's fascination, and kind of the whole point.
What isn't typical about the Newkirks' approach is that they're not afraid to get into the weird complexities. I can't stand typical ghost hunting shows but this is much deeper. They dive into the psychological muck, take their time getting the emotional experience and tone right. They research everything and show how gooey myth and folklore are. It's cool to watch them piece together their research and experiences - no matter what I personally believe. Yea it's their cognitive bias but so is every single religious or supernatural experience. Regardless, I followed their logic. They touch on magic and the collective unconscious and tie it all together. They might have the goofy tools other ghost hunters have, but they use them in unique ways, and that's only the surface of what they do.
Even if this is all staged, it's still a good story. It's impossible to say what they actually believe, so I can't speculate on their intentions, but it was cool to learn about a goddess I didn't know about before. And I really like what Strand said about how studying the paranormal is like studying yourself. It's true. I think they manage to touch on something ancient that is a key part of the human experience we don't often get to connect with.
I didn't come out of this believing in ghosts or gods. What I got out of this was entertainment and I learned something new. And I did get a little spooked!
What isn't typical about the Newkirks' approach is that they're not afraid to get into the weird complexities. I can't stand typical ghost hunting shows but this is much deeper. They dive into the psychological muck, take their time getting the emotional experience and tone right. They research everything and show how gooey myth and folklore are. It's cool to watch them piece together their research and experiences - no matter what I personally believe. Yea it's their cognitive bias but so is every single religious or supernatural experience. Regardless, I followed their logic. They touch on magic and the collective unconscious and tie it all together. They might have the goofy tools other ghost hunters have, but they use them in unique ways, and that's only the surface of what they do.
Even if this is all staged, it's still a good story. It's impossible to say what they actually believe, so I can't speculate on their intentions, but it was cool to learn about a goddess I didn't know about before. And I really like what Strand said about how studying the paranormal is like studying yourself. It's true. I think they manage to touch on something ancient that is a key part of the human experience we don't often get to connect with.
I didn't come out of this believing in ghosts or gods. What I got out of this was entertainment and I learned something new. And I did get a little spooked!
This is quite blatantly a scripted, fiction film, that is- for some reason- listed here as a "documentary".
It's not.
And is quite clear about that fact.
That being said...the reasons for this become obvious when you learn who the filmmakers behind the project are: the husband and wife team of Greg and Dana Newkirk.
A couple who run a museum and podcast dedicated to haunted objects, and stories about haunted objects.
So...this is effectively just an elaborate marketing pitch, and call for you to send them your claimed to be haunted items for free...so they can put it in their museum, and make bank off it.
Now...I do believe in haunted objects...I have a painting called "Evil Man", which has a demonic entity attached to it.
So...I am by no means a skeptic.
However...the story presented here- about an effigy found in the Catskills mountain, with nails driven into the eyes, that is said to be haunted a "Crone" type entity- is quite absurd.
And backed by no evidence whatsoever...other than unfounded, unreliable, unreplicatable "ghost hunting" techniques that can easily be dismissed.
As previously noted...when all is said and done, it's actually quite clear that the whole thing is scripted.
They not only allude to this fact...but even poke fun at it.
So, as a documentary...it has zero value.
Though, as a mockumentary...you might argue it's cleverly done.
That is...if you ignore that it's mainly a feature length commercial for themselves, and their museum.
Acting as a desperate plea for you to send them your thought to be haunted objects.
So it doesn't deserve anything more than a 2.5 out of 10.
Which is being generous.
It's not.
And is quite clear about that fact.
That being said...the reasons for this become obvious when you learn who the filmmakers behind the project are: the husband and wife team of Greg and Dana Newkirk.
A couple who run a museum and podcast dedicated to haunted objects, and stories about haunted objects.
So...this is effectively just an elaborate marketing pitch, and call for you to send them your claimed to be haunted items for free...so they can put it in their museum, and make bank off it.
Now...I do believe in haunted objects...I have a painting called "Evil Man", which has a demonic entity attached to it.
So...I am by no means a skeptic.
However...the story presented here- about an effigy found in the Catskills mountain, with nails driven into the eyes, that is said to be haunted a "Crone" type entity- is quite absurd.
And backed by no evidence whatsoever...other than unfounded, unreliable, unreplicatable "ghost hunting" techniques that can easily be dismissed.
As previously noted...when all is said and done, it's actually quite clear that the whole thing is scripted.
They not only allude to this fact...but even poke fun at it.
So, as a documentary...it has zero value.
Though, as a mockumentary...you might argue it's cleverly done.
That is...if you ignore that it's mainly a feature length commercial for themselves, and their museum.
Acting as a desperate plea for you to send them your thought to be haunted objects.
So it doesn't deserve anything more than a 2.5 out of 10.
Which is being generous.
In its favour, the movie is entertaining and presents a "story" pretty well. It relies a lot in the confusing / missing information as to maintain the expectation and mystery.
Viewers are scratching their heads to make sense of it. That was well done. It maintains the focus.
On the negative side, the story is too weird and cringy. The ancient being manipulates things around in a magic way, too magic and too directly.
There are funny/silly parts such as when they carefully wrap the statue and lock the padlock carefully as to not disturb the entity and later they carry the box to the hill hanging it from the back while the box swings side to side... too much for carefully manipulating the statue...haha The "witch" is doing a great role as the "wisdom" talker and at times she says things darn well.
I think it is entertaining although it falls into the typical ghost / mystery enchanted objects movie but without the silly techniques other movies resource to.
Viewers are scratching their heads to make sense of it. That was well done. It maintains the focus.
On the negative side, the story is too weird and cringy. The ancient being manipulates things around in a magic way, too magic and too directly.
There are funny/silly parts such as when they carefully wrap the statue and lock the padlock carefully as to not disturb the entity and later they carry the box to the hill hanging it from the back while the box swings side to side... too much for carefully manipulating the statue...haha The "witch" is doing a great role as the "wisdom" talker and at times she says things darn well.
I think it is entertaining although it falls into the typical ghost / mystery enchanted objects movie but without the silly techniques other movies resource to.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe first livestream about the Crone was on September 6th, 2017. The stream was on their private Facebook page. It was also one of the first 10 streams after the Newkirks began their monthly museum membership, so not many people saw it live.
- Bandes originalesByssan Lull
Written by Evert Taube
Performed by Myrkur
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Unbinding?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 38 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant