Un officier IPS sincère, qui s'attaque à un syndicat du crime, dirigé par un cerveau diabolique.Un officier IPS sincère, qui s'attaque à un syndicat du crime, dirigé par un cerveau diabolique.Un officier IPS sincère, qui s'attaque à un syndicat du crime, dirigé par un cerveau diabolique.
Parcourir les épisodes
Photos
Avis à la une
Waste of time" would be an understatement when describing my experience watching "Mathagam." I was intrigued by the prospect of delving into a unique narrative, but what I encountered was a convoluted mess that left me questioning the director's intentions and storytelling choices.
In an interview, Atharvaa, one of the key actors in the film, shared that he had questioned the director about the possibility of turning "Mathagam" into a conventional theatrical experience. The director's response, claiming that such a shift would compromise the depth of character portrayal, now appears to be a baffling justification for a truly misguided endeavor.
The film sprawls over five seemingly never-ending episodes, attempting to dissect and elucidate the intricacies of its characters. However, this approach backfires, as these extended episodes add nothing substantial to the plot or character development. Instead, they merely serve as a showcase of the director's inability to effectively communicate his narrative in a concise and engaging manner.
In an interview, Atharvaa, one of the key actors in the film, shared that he had questioned the director about the possibility of turning "Mathagam" into a conventional theatrical experience. The director's response, claiming that such a shift would compromise the depth of character portrayal, now appears to be a baffling justification for a truly misguided endeavor.
The film sprawls over five seemingly never-ending episodes, attempting to dissect and elucidate the intricacies of its characters. However, this approach backfires, as these extended episodes add nothing substantial to the plot or character development. Instead, they merely serve as a showcase of the director's inability to effectively communicate his narrative in a concise and engaging manner.
This series should have been rated above 8.5 but I don't know why it is rated 6.4
Excellent direction and acting especially atharva,Manikandan and lady commissioner atharva is a holliwood material he is wasting his time in tamil industry. The series carries out the phase slow and steady for a fitting climax.i can sense it. This series will be a great hit and It will open the doors for the director for a great future
This series is the best in tamil I have ever seen all the actors have acted splendidly and photography editing and everything is good in the series dd is a surprise package as always she did her job well.
Mathagam season 01 has five episodes.
The premise is interesting as it comes under the cop vs gangster theme which is always an interesting theme. But the problem with the series is that it is just expositions rather than showing. The series has a lot of interesting characters and performances but all of it is like a tease for the second season. The characters and their strengths are explained through dialogues but none of it can be experienced on screen. We can't tell if the series is interesting or not until we watch the next season. Screenplay is where it lags in this season, let's hope they write it better in second season.
The premise is interesting as it comes under the cop vs gangster theme which is always an interesting theme. But the problem with the series is that it is just expositions rather than showing. The series has a lot of interesting characters and performances but all of it is like a tease for the second season. The characters and their strengths are explained through dialogues but none of it can be experienced on screen. We can't tell if the series is interesting or not until we watch the next season. Screenplay is where it lags in this season, let's hope they write it better in second season.
Atharva looks handsome in this series. This series doesn't tell user what's happening and what's the conclusion,who won etc... I watched the entire series in one day only because of Atharva. Inspite of being multi-talented why Atharva didn't get break I don't know. I wish to see him as a big 🌟 hope he get succeed in upcoming films. Lots of love from Karnataka .his grandfather siddalingahai gave so many hit movies in kannada .His father also did good kannada movies.lot of respect to siddalingahai family. Atharva sir please select good scripts especially good music albums in your upcoming movies. I wonder why you are not asuccessful hero in Tamil industry please select good song please please.
"Waste of time" would be an understatement when describing my experience watching "Mathagam." I was intrigued by the prospect of delving into a unique narrative, but what I encountered was a convoluted mess that left me questioning the director's intentions and storytelling choices.
In an interview, Atharvaa, one of the key actors in the film, shared that he had questioned the director about the possibility of turning "Mathagam" into a conventional theatrical experience. The director's response, claiming that such a shift would compromise the depth of character portrayal, now appears to be a baffling justification for a truly misguided endeavor.
The film sprawls over five seemingly never-ending episodes, attempting to dissect and elucidate the intricacies of its characters. However, this approach backfires, as these extended episodes add nothing substantial to the plot or character development. Instead, they merely serve as a showcase of the director's inability to effectively communicate his narrative in a concise and engaging manner.
One of the film's central themes revolves around the titular term "Mathagam," which translates to "head" in English. The characters' voices attempt to convey that the main antagonist relies on his intellect rather than physical prowess. However, this proclamation falls flat, as the film fails to provide any concrete instances or sequences that truly showcase the villain's intelligence. This discrepancy between the voiceover's claims and the on-screen portrayal is emblematic of the larger issues plaguing "Mathagam."
The decision to cast the main villain as a weak, non-physically imposing individual might have been a daring move on the director's part, but it unfortunately doesn't pan out effectively. The character's supposed intellectual superiority is lost amidst a lackluster performance and poor execution. Manikandan, a director known for his innovative and thought-provoking works, appears entirely out of his element with "Mathagam." The ill-conceived character choices and the overall execution of the film do a disservice to his directorial prowess.
In the end, "Mathagam" is a prime example of wasted potential. Its ambitious attempt to showcase character depth and intellectual conflict falls flat due to poor execution, sluggish pacing, and a narrative that feels unnecessarily stretched. While the idea of exploring the power of the mind over physical strength is intriguing, the film's inability to translate this concept into a compelling on-screen experience leaves viewers utterly unsatisfied.
Save yourself the disappointment and invest your time elsewhere. "Mathagam" is far from the caliber of work we've come to expect from its director and the talented cast involved.
In an interview, Atharvaa, one of the key actors in the film, shared that he had questioned the director about the possibility of turning "Mathagam" into a conventional theatrical experience. The director's response, claiming that such a shift would compromise the depth of character portrayal, now appears to be a baffling justification for a truly misguided endeavor.
The film sprawls over five seemingly never-ending episodes, attempting to dissect and elucidate the intricacies of its characters. However, this approach backfires, as these extended episodes add nothing substantial to the plot or character development. Instead, they merely serve as a showcase of the director's inability to effectively communicate his narrative in a concise and engaging manner.
One of the film's central themes revolves around the titular term "Mathagam," which translates to "head" in English. The characters' voices attempt to convey that the main antagonist relies on his intellect rather than physical prowess. However, this proclamation falls flat, as the film fails to provide any concrete instances or sequences that truly showcase the villain's intelligence. This discrepancy between the voiceover's claims and the on-screen portrayal is emblematic of the larger issues plaguing "Mathagam."
The decision to cast the main villain as a weak, non-physically imposing individual might have been a daring move on the director's part, but it unfortunately doesn't pan out effectively. The character's supposed intellectual superiority is lost amidst a lackluster performance and poor execution. Manikandan, a director known for his innovative and thought-provoking works, appears entirely out of his element with "Mathagam." The ill-conceived character choices and the overall execution of the film do a disservice to his directorial prowess.
In the end, "Mathagam" is a prime example of wasted potential. Its ambitious attempt to showcase character depth and intellectual conflict falls flat due to poor execution, sluggish pacing, and a narrative that feels unnecessarily stretched. While the idea of exploring the power of the mind over physical strength is intriguing, the film's inability to translate this concept into a compelling on-screen experience leaves viewers utterly unsatisfied.
Save yourself the disappointment and invest your time elsewhere. "Mathagam" is far from the caliber of work we've come to expect from its director and the talented cast involved.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Mathagam have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant