NOTE IMDb
3,5/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Cassidy, une biologiste marine hantée par la mort de son père, part en expédition de plongée près de Madagascar avec son petit ami et d'autres plongeurs. Leur voyage tourne au cauchemar aprè... Tout lireCassidy, une biologiste marine hantée par la mort de son père, part en expédition de plongée près de Madagascar avec son petit ami et d'autres plongeurs. Leur voyage tourne au cauchemar après l'attaque de pirates..Cassidy, une biologiste marine hantée par la mort de son père, part en expédition de plongée près de Madagascar avec son petit ami et d'autres plongeurs. Leur voyage tourne au cauchemar après l'attaque de pirates..
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Scout Taylor-Compton
- Cassidy Branham
- (as Scout Taylor Compton)
Tofan Pirani
- Apache
- (as TJ [Tofan Pirani])
Maverick Kang Jr.
- Pierre
- (as Maverick Kang)
Avis à la une
I usually enjoy cheesy/campy "thrillers" like this, but this one was tough to get through. It's pretty obvious that the director only had about 30 minutes of plot, so he filled in the rest of the movie with long, boring, meaningless and unnecessary flashbacks in order to stretch the movie and give Richard Dreyfuss something to do so they could slap his name on the poster in order to give the movie some legitimacy. I wasn't expecting high art, but I was hoping it would at least be entertaining. Bad dialogue, plot holes, cheap looking CGI, and hammy acting were expected (and delivered) but they could have at least added some semblance of a plot and anything to hold your attention. The flashbacks were so redundant and drawn out. Dreyfuss was just mailing this one in. He probably received a nice big check, shot all his scenes in a day or two, took a nice vacation, then hoped and prayed that this movie would never see the light of day. Out of respect for the legendary Richard Dreyfuss, please skip this movie and we can all just pretend that it never happened.
I normally would not have watched this, but the hubby wanted to, so there you go. It was not the worst movie I've ever seen, but it certainly wasn't the best. There was one particularly bad effect that almost had me laughing out loud, but I was pleasantly surprised that most of the movie was not completely unwatchable. In fact, at times it was rather entertaining, and there were a couple of pretty good performances.
Richard Dreyfus was, of course, excellent, but I confess it makes me sad when I see an Oscar winner playing a supporting role in a B movie. But, as they say, "That's show business."
Richard Dreyfus was, of course, excellent, but I confess it makes me sad when I see an Oscar winner playing a supporting role in a B movie. But, as they say, "That's show business."
It's been a while since I've bothered to officially review anything on here, this, however, was a must !
I didn't expect anything groundbreaking or worthy of an Oscar. What I did expect, is better than this !
Holy cowabunga, is this what has become of Richard Dreyfuss ? After playing 'Hooper' in the legendary 'Jaws'......he then participated in this.......this.......this can only be classed as absolutely terrible ?!
Characters = no personality, you can't warm too or associate with any of them.
Dialogue = poor, at best.
Story = been done more than once.
Scenery = erm......not exactly great.
CGI = nothing more than abysmal.
I'm just going to leave it at that and hope there aren't too many others out there expecting better.
I'm disappointed in myself for thinking this could've at least been deemed 'acceptable'.
I didn't expect anything groundbreaking or worthy of an Oscar. What I did expect, is better than this !
Holy cowabunga, is this what has become of Richard Dreyfuss ? After playing 'Hooper' in the legendary 'Jaws'......he then participated in this.......this.......this can only be classed as absolutely terrible ?!
Characters = no personality, you can't warm too or associate with any of them.
Dialogue = poor, at best.
Story = been done more than once.
Scenery = erm......not exactly great.
CGI = nothing more than abysmal.
I'm just going to leave it at that and hope there aren't too many others out there expecting better.
I'm disappointed in myself for thinking this could've at least been deemed 'acceptable'.
If you love shark movies, you will probably watch this regardless of the reviews. This is nowhere as good as The Shallows or as fun as Deep Blue Sea, but it's better than most shark movies we get. Is it good? No, but for shark movie fans worth a watch on a lazy Sunday or with some friends (drinks encouraged!) who like bad movies. The main cast all do an adequate job. It is always nice to see Richard Dreyfuss, but his character (the leads grandfather, mostly seen in flashbacks) isn't really needed in the film. The Shark FX range from pretty good to pretty bad depending on the scene, but are generally better than most modern low budget Shark films. There is a good amount of Shark footage, though there actions are not believable. There is a lot of CGI blood, but not much actual gore. As for the story, it's basic but serviceable and gets our cast out in the ocean to be fed upon by sharks patrolling the same waters as drug dealers trying to obtain their sunken drugs. If you aren't a shark film fan, skip this unless you like bad movies, but if you are give it a watch (just keep expectations low).
Into the Deep (2025) is an absolute mess of a film. The plot is shallow and riddled with clichés, the characters are completely forgettable, and the dialogue feels like it was written by someone who gave up halfway through. It tries to be a serious thriller, but instead, it drags on with predictable twists and zero suspense.
The sharks, which should be the highlight, are laughably bad. The CGI is outdated and unconvincing, completely robbing the movie of any tension or excitement. Instead of creating a sense of fear, it feels like the filmmakers didn't even try to make the visuals remotely believable.
Honestly, even Sharknado is way better. At least that film is entertaining in its absurdity. Into the Deep doesn't even manage to be fun-it's just dull and forgettable. Don't waste your time.
The sharks, which should be the highlight, are laughably bad. The CGI is outdated and unconvincing, completely robbing the movie of any tension or excitement. Instead of creating a sense of fear, it feels like the filmmakers didn't even try to make the visuals remotely believable.
Honestly, even Sharknado is way better. At least that film is entertaining in its absurdity. Into the Deep doesn't even manage to be fun-it's just dull and forgettable. Don't waste your time.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRichard Dreyfuss' first shark film since his iconic portrayal of Hooper in Jaws (1975), not counting his narration of the 2007 Shark Week TV movie "Ocean of Fear". He portrayed Matt Boyd in the 2010 remake of "Piranha" which was a nod to his Matt Hooper character. Incidentally, the Piranha film series is in itself is a spoof of Jaws.
- Crédits fousThe end credits are played next to Richard Dreyfuss speaking about and for shark conservation.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Into the Deep?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 3 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 87 338 $US
- Durée
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant