The Nobody Zone: Interview with an Irish Serial Killer

Whole documentry was really odd so repetative i thought id accidentally skipped back.could of used more actual tape recordings and got to the point. Was an intresting story but.... It plays on your mind...... at times.

Whole documentry was really odd so repetative i thought id accidentally skipped back.could of used more actual tape recordings and got to the point. Was an intresting story but.... It plays on your mind...... at times.

Whole documentry was really odd so repetative i thought id accidentally skipped back.could of used more actual tape recordings and got to the point. Was an intresting story but.... It plays on your mind...... at times.

See what i did there.

By the second part I wished he would kill me.

Did you kill him?

Yes, maybe, no, yes...maybe. Great. So, whatever RTE do next, it shouldn't be more of this. Every single victim gets the same response and even when he is sure he killed someone, they tell him that he couldn't have because he was in prison when it happened. And then we're onto the next victim. Did you kill him? Yes, maybe, no, yes...maybe...

It just feels like someone's pulling your fingernails out one by one-which would have been far more entertaining I might add.

So what was the point of this? Apart from boredom, obviously. Because it's not very interesting.

It's impossible to understand how the production team could have watched the final edit, shared mutual congratulations on a good job and trotted off to the pub! The repetition is incredibly frustrating and beyond embarrassing. The whole story could and should have been told in 20 minutes which would have done more justice to the main actor who is excellent. As you listen to the same dialogue or tape recording for the fifth or sixth time you can't help but wonder at how this could have been more badly executed. Save your time and sanity: search google for the story. One can only hope the director learns from this shocker and finds a career to which he/she is more suited.

Roughly 20 minutes of footage and voice overs repeated over and over into two episodes.

Surprised that this was watched back by production and they went ahead with it.

Roughly 20 minutes of footage and voice overs repeated over and over into two episodes.

Surprised that this was watched back by production and they went ahead with it

Roughly 20 minutes of footage and voice overs repeated over and over into two episodes.

Surprised that this was watched back by production and they went ahead with it

Roughly 20 minutes of footage and voice overs repeated over and over into two episodes.

Surprised that this was watched back by production and they went ahead with it.

Ned Dennehy did an excellent job portraying the psychopathic Kieran Kelly.

The story itself is quite fascinating, however this could have been so much better.

The editing/direction was so poor. The constant repeating everything over and over quickly became very irritating, to the point I couldn't finish it. I assume the thought behind the decision to keep replaying the same scenes over and over was to try and build tension? It can't have been to recap, unless your pet goldfish is into crime docu dramas...the whole story could have been condensed into 30 minutes, and been much sharper and punchier. I think if you're interested, then read up about this case because watching this is unlikely to hold your attention.