1988

The movie could've been so much better if the dialogue was good, it was bad very bad. And the movie didn't make you feel bad for the characters that die in the movie and it felt like the movie was very rushed. And it didn't show halabja being bombed far away, and when the bombing happened, you could barely even hear any screams, only infants crying, that's all. The only good thing about the movie was the visuals camera works and the explosions. That's all. The story was weak, characters were weak, no dramatic music was used. Overall it was the director's fault and not the actors nor the camera crew.

1988 is a powerful and emotional film that captures the complexities of Kurdish life and struggles during a tumultuous period. The movie touches on themes of identity, loss, and resilience, with strong performances that bring the story to life. The cinematography beautifully showcases the landscapes and atmosphere, immersing viewers in the emotional depth of the narrative.

However, there is one significant issue in the portrayal of Kurdish culture in this film: the inclusion of scenes showing Kurds drinking alcohol. This is a clear misrepresentation and does not align with the reality of Kurdish values. Such depictions are misleading and disrespectful to the cultural and religious beliefs of many Kurds, especially those who hold their traditions and faith dearly. It's disappointing to see such inaccuracies, and I urge filmmakers to be more culturally sensitive and truthful in their storytelling.

Overall, 1988 is a well-made film, but the false portrayal of Kurds drinking alcohol detracts from its authenticity.

The tragedy and massacres and genocide that happened to Kurdish nation can't be forgotten this masterpiece can describe a little of all the miseries that happened to kurds but it's just a drop in the sea. Meanwhile our neighbouring countries try to make people forget about our past but somehow we managed to survive and endure all these pains and slaughtering how a person could forget about how his/her grandparents or ancestors went through not only in Southern Kurdistan' but same thing or maybe worse things happened in northern Kurdistan (Southern and eastern) Turkey or western Iran and Northern Syria and other kurds who lived in Armenia and Russia we will be free inshallah one day.

Kurdish cinema still struggles to find its footing, and honestly, it's not surprising given the many challenges it faces. There's the constant issue of low budgets, which makes it hard to produce high-quality films. On top of that, there aren't many professional actors available, and government support is pretty limited. All these factors make it tough for filmmakers to take risks or invest in truly original ideas. Unfortunately, this has led many directors to lean on Persian and Turkish films as templates instead of exploring their own unique stories and voices.

That's why 1988 feels like such a breath of fresh air. Even with limited resources, the filmmakers managed to create something genuinely impactful and meaningful. It shows that despite the hurdles, great Kurdish cinema is possible. Of course, it's not perfect. With a bigger budget and a more fully fleshed-out story, 1988 could have been even more powerful. Still, it's an important step forward, and it gives hope that Kurdish cinema will continue to grow and develop its own identity in the years to come.

The film didn't have any good actors except Tola, but it was enjoyable, although it didn't leave any important message behind. But it's still worth watching. It's one of the most fun films about Kurdistan's history and you'll be excited for the ending. I hope more films like this are produced not about history, but about what you do if you fall in love, like the character of Tola, who we saw did everything for Shilan, what is interesting, the story of Tola and Shilan is based on truth,And my nice review of the movie I think 6/10 deserves in my opinion,Thank you Tola, thank you 1988 Movie :)...