King & Conqueror

I love historic dramas and was looking forward to one set at the time of the Norman Conquest of England.

The story is in no way historically accurate, but I don't mind that, as long as it is well written and believable. The problem is it is not believable - the use of race inappropriate actors for the period totally breaks immersion. Why bother with period costumes if they are going to change the race of characters? Both are equally important for a believable period drama.

There is no evidence at all of Africans at the Battle of Hastings and none in the Norman or Saxon armies. In no way was England "diverse" in the 11th Century.

In the film Prey all Native Americans were played by actors of Native American heritage, in Shogun all Japanese characters were played by amazing Japanese actors. The same respect should be given to white European dramas. I am fed up with these double standards.

So much money spent, such a brilliant cast, why turn this incredibly important story into such gung ho fantasy drivel. Really disappointed coming from the BBC.

Some good acting. Apparently filmed in Iceland. Didnt look much like Normandy or England. Nevertheless worth watching if interested in this period.

The cast is packed with talent. The cinematography is excellent. The stakes couldn't be higher. In these regards, it's a success as a drama.

The issue is everything else. The script couldn't be more boiler plate. It even has the trope of ending some sentences with "was it not" just to make it sound old timey. This is a cliche that has been used in numerous times in poor historical dramas. The actors are good, but they still have to spit out the lines that they're given and the script isn't as strong as the performances.

Then there is the history. Let's just leave it that despite this being a genuinely exciting time with larger than life characters and a genuine series of epic and exciting events. I have no idea why the writers just decided to make most of it up.

We have Anglo-Saxons wearing tartan, the armour is largely wrong as our most of the architecture. Battle tactics and interactions between key people are nonsense. The question has to be who is this for? If you're a fan of history, get it right. If you can't be bothered to tell the historical story then write a fantasy like the Witcher. This is an example of a project that will keep nobody happy.

I have literally written a book about the complexities of bringing the past to life. If you're interested, it's called- Hollywood and History by Jem Duducu. This is one of these examples where it has a veneer of quality to it but the reality is this is as high fantasy as the movie 300. It's a solid enough drama just don't call it history.

When I'm watching dramas about history, I do like them to be at least a bit historically accurate. Normans looked very different from Anglo Saxons, but in this the wardrobe department has dressed them all the same.

The production looks good but the script and the language are too contemporary. When one of the cast said wow! I gave up it's too painful to watch.

They have assembled some great actors. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau and James Norton as William and Harold are doing their best with what they've been given. Disappointing.

I really wanted to love this production & had big hopes BUT a boring script, corny lines, dont do it for me. Most of the actors are capable however a couple are dire (or their lines and the delivery of them is dire)..one character being the young Judith whom Harold's' brother Tostig has taken a shine to. Why is it the trend at the moment for some actors ('Judith')to deliver their lines in such a mind-numbingly flat and boring style with no impact whatsoever that i wonder why they got the role? The script is so dull that you fall asleep. The cast is pretty damn good (Edward Norton & 'William' especially stand out in this) but the whole thing could have been SO much better.