Découvrez des dinosaures particuliers grâce à cette enquête où des paléontologues fouillent une créature spécifique, ce qui permet de décrire leur vie quotidienne avec une précision sans pré... Tout lireDécouvrez des dinosaures particuliers grâce à cette enquête où des paléontologues fouillent une créature spécifique, ce qui permet de décrire leur vie quotidienne avec une précision sans précédent.Découvrez des dinosaures particuliers grâce à cette enquête où des paléontologues fouillent une créature spécifique, ce qui permet de décrire leur vie quotidienne avec une précision sans précédent.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I was waiting for this to be released for a long time. I couldn't wait to see an updated dinosaur show, both in terms of CGI and in scientific understanding. We almost got both, but neither shines the way they should.
What we do have is a character-driven narrative style for each episode. These stories feel entirely unnatural and based more on the writers' ideas of what makes a compelling structure than what the science actually shows. Amongst these contrived scenarios we get some insight from actual paleantologists, which are quite good but feature far too prominently.
This is not Walking With Dinosaurs the way we know it. The show should have presented the animals as if we were observing them in a nature documentary. Instead we get a series of silly what-if situations, very loosely based on scientific evidence.
The storytelling element and lack of actual dinosaurs on screen ruin this. I get that it's cheaper to interview people than it is to make complex computer animations, but it doesn't work for this show. We want the dinosaurs on screen acting in a way that seems natural.
What we do have is a character-driven narrative style for each episode. These stories feel entirely unnatural and based more on the writers' ideas of what makes a compelling structure than what the science actually shows. Amongst these contrived scenarios we get some insight from actual paleantologists, which are quite good but feature far too prominently.
This is not Walking With Dinosaurs the way we know it. The show should have presented the animals as if we were observing them in a nature documentary. Instead we get a series of silly what-if situations, very loosely based on scientific evidence.
The storytelling element and lack of actual dinosaurs on screen ruin this. I get that it's cheaper to interview people than it is to make complex computer animations, but it doesn't work for this show. We want the dinosaurs on screen acting in a way that seems natural.
I have been so excited for this show to premiere, however first episode in and I was already disappointed, they called it walking with dinosaurs but it is anything but. I have never wrote a review for anything but I had and still have such a love for the original, I was so excited when I heard they were remaking it. The timing is so out of place with them flipping between a the dinos and the dig sites, they could've had an extra episode focused purely on the digs sites but chopping up the story was just difficult to watch, the animation is also sub par. All in all very disappointing. Definitely does not have the same feel as the original. The music, narration, storylines and script are all bellow my expectations for what this should have been.
Sincerely, a dinosaur nerd since the early 2000's.
Sincerely, a dinosaur nerd since the early 2000's.
The BBC should hang their heads in shame. CGI from the 50's, overly dramatic story telling, cuts to dumbed down palaeontologist commentary, horrible 'human like' dinosaur reactions, and ultimately a really boring series of shows. Honestly, if you don't love what you do - go home. Leave the making of these beloved shows to people who care and can negotiate a budget. No hope for your kids falling in love with dinosaurs after this mess.
Format should have been like the original. Long show of purely dinosaurs with good story telling and interesting interactions. Then, like Planet Earth sometimes does, do a 'behind the scenes' style show. Like what inspired the story.
If my legacy was to be depicted like this I'd have tried so much harder to survive the impact of the meteor just to make sure mammals didn't rise up to work in the BBC feature making department.
Format should have been like the original. Long show of purely dinosaurs with good story telling and interesting interactions. Then, like Planet Earth sometimes does, do a 'behind the scenes' style show. Like what inspired the story.
If my legacy was to be depicted like this I'd have tried so much harder to survive the impact of the meteor just to make sure mammals didn't rise up to work in the BBC feature making department.
Compared to the original this is something that belongs on Disney+
The dinosaurs are far to cartoony and look really CGI. In places it looks almost to computer-gamey and unrealistic.
How can something with 25 years computer and animation development look worse than the original?
The stories are happy-clappy woe is me with dinosaur behaviour you have no way of substantiating scientifically.
Stick to the science and stop trying to "tell a good story".
The narration is very poor and it is hard to get into.
Then there is the painful dialogue between researchers is cringeworthy to listen to - why make up obvious fake dialogue for people in the field.
Overall this is a major let-down - the original was (and still is) far superior.
How can something with 25 years computer and animation development look worse than the original?
The stories are happy-clappy woe is me with dinosaur behaviour you have no way of substantiating scientifically.
Stick to the science and stop trying to "tell a good story".
The narration is very poor and it is hard to get into.
Then there is the painful dialogue between researchers is cringeworthy to listen to - why make up obvious fake dialogue for people in the field.
Overall this is a major let-down - the original was (and still is) far superior.
It's ok. I can't help but feel Jurassic Park felt more realistic, and that was over 30 years ago. Even the first Walking with Dinosaurs 20 years ago seemed to have more believable animated dinosaurs, from memory.
I quite like the format of telling the story about a central character each episode, but the archeologist segments really take you out of the story. I prefer the usual format where you have 10 minutes at the end to meet the people behind the story.
The narrator sounds as bored as I was, or maybe I was bored because of his drone. There wasn't a moment of excitement or fascination in his voice.
I quite like the format of telling the story about a central character each episode, but the archeologist segments really take you out of the story. I prefer the usual format where you have 10 minutes at the end to meet the people behind the story.
The narrator sounds as bored as I was, or maybe I was bored because of his drone. There wasn't a moment of excitement or fascination in his voice.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAs explained by Thomas Holtz, much of the series' informative content was not always based on scientific consensus but rather on the personal beliefs and hypotheses of each episode's main scientific advisor. For example, the deep water swimming hypothesis for Spinosaurus presented in episode 2 has been heavily disputed by lab experiments and scientific papers years before the series' production. These suggest that Spoinosaurus would have more likely been at home wading in shallow water and its tail was not adapted for swimming. However, this episode was overseen by Dr. Nizar Ibrahim and thus his older, disputed ideas were favored.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant