Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsHoliday Watch GuideGotham AwardsSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Pluribus
S1.E5
Tous les épisodesTout
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
IMDbPro

Got Milk

  • Épisode diffusé le 26 nov. 2025
  • TV-MA
  • 46min
NOTE IMDb
8,0/10
5,1 k
MA NOTE
Rhea Seehorn in Got Milk (2025)
DrameScience-fiction

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueCarol doubles down on her investigation-loneliness be damned. Meanwhile, howls in the night reveal a new source of danger.Carol doubles down on her investigation-loneliness be damned. Meanwhile, howls in the night reveal a new source of danger.Carol doubles down on her investigation-loneliness be damned. Meanwhile, howls in the night reveal a new source of danger.

  • Réalisation
    • Gordon Smith
  • Scénaristes
    • Ariel Levine
    • Vera Blasi
    • Jonny Gomez
  • Stars
    • Rhea Seehorn
    • Karolina Wydra
    • Menik Gooneratne
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    8,0/10
    5,1 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Gordon Smith
    • Scénaristes
      • Ariel Levine
      • Vera Blasi
      • Jonny Gomez
    • Stars
      • Rhea Seehorn
      • Karolina Wydra
      • Menik Gooneratne
    • 60avis d'utilisateurs
    • 5avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos11

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 7
    Voir l'affiche

    Casting principal14

    Modifier
    Rhea Seehorn
    Rhea Seehorn
    • Carol Sturka
    Karolina Wydra
    Karolina Wydra
    • Zosia
    Menik Gooneratne
    Menik Gooneratne
    • Laxmi
    Rayaan Kamal Khan
    Rayaan Kamal Khan
    • Ravi
    Merritt C. Glover
    Merritt C. Glover
    • Nurse
    Tara Southerland
    • Tatted-Out Orderly
    Roy Ward
    Roy Ward
    • Stone-Faced Man
    Elliott Mayer
    Elliott Mayer
    • Placid Patient
    Samuel Appenzeller
    Samuel Appenzeller
    • Young Child
    • (as Sam Appenzeller)
    Loren Anthony
    Loren Anthony
    • Patient Other
    McKenzie Scott
    McKenzie Scott
    • Woman in Sweats
    Jamie Javier Guerrero
    • Burly Dude
    Anthony Xzavier Estrada
    Anthony Xzavier Estrada
    • Patient
    • (non crédité)
    Patrick Fabian
    Patrick Fabian
    • Answering Machine Other
    • (voix)
    • (non crédité)
    • Réalisation
      • Gordon Smith
    • Scénaristes
      • Ariel Levine
      • Vera Blasi
      • Jonny Gomez
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs60

    8,05K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    martinshh

    Would have worked better with more non-infected

    After 5 episodes I'm really getting bored of the series. Breaking Bad had the perfect mix of story-heavy and "fly"'episodes. This series only has "fly" episodes bar the first one. In my opinion, the decision to make it a one-(wo)man-show is a real bummer. It works for an episode, but not for 4. The other survivors are mostly plain stupid and annoying like the Indian lady.

    If they had a team of survivors working together, they could have kept the same story depth but bring more meaningful conversation to it.

    At the current speed every episode is getting worse and the whole storyline is absolutely getting nowhere.
    9jamiecearns

    Please trust Vince.

    We have seen from Vince Gilligan's previous shows Breaking Bad & Better Call Saul that he is a man that takes him time in storytelling. We can see this here in pluribus; slow yet maintaining an interesting story. Trust in the process. Vince said in an interview that show likely will go for 4 seasons, meaning there is a lot more world building to come.
    9IcyPickle

    Great episode! But some hate it!

    I'm astonished by the amount of people not taking the time to understand Carol's thinking process this episode, I even saw someone straight up saying they were on their phone waiting for something to happen, and I think that's not okay.

    If you're one of these people, do NOT watch the show, This show, like everything Vince Gilligan made, expects you to use at least two braincells to figure out what's going on. Normally this formula wouldn't work in your typical TV show, but since it's VINCE GILLIGAN for god's sake.. the viewer is ALWAYS gonna give the show the benefit of the doubt for anything weird that happens, and in the end, they won't leave disappointed. This has stayed consistent in everything he's made after Breaking Bad.

    Vince is the kind of guy that delves deep into a story, he wants you to be engaged in the experience, he wants you to theorize, he wants you to use your brain, he wants you to go wild! You'll probably end up theorizing right or something else will happen that's gonna basically scream "HAH! I knew you were thinking about that! Good try but nope, try again!"

    Vince takes the "un" out of "unrealistic", his shows have quite a rare attribute to them that not a lot of shows have: The main character has common sense & isn't so extravagantly smart to the point that it kills the immersion! You don't find yourself screaming at Carol behind the screen because she missed something so obvious, and she's not thinking of stuff that magically turns out to be true like it's some divine intervention, She's acting like a human being! And I think that's the part I love the most about the show, the immersion.. which sadly, most people seem to miss.
    7EllenG-24

    E4 & E5 could have been one episode

    This show still has me and I'm eagerly awaiting each new episode but 4 and 5 had several long drawn out sequences that could have been told much more efficiently and all of it combine into one episode. I mean E5 is the consequence of E4. Just pare down the unnecessarily long processes we see play out and get to it. Also the abrupt ending to E5 feels like a contrived cliff hanger after literally no suspense at any point in the whole episode. I love the show's premise but I do wish the episodes were closer to evenly paced.
    aftcastilho

    Not my show.

    Bro, Vince Gilligan is bad here - not just a little bad, he's awful. I'm watching his new series "Pluribus." The premise is fantastic, but the plot holes, the distrust of the audience, and the slow pacing are melancholic to the point of pain. It's like seeing the memorial page of your childhood Instagram account - you're surprised, but it hits you with this huge sadness.

    The show gives you a fantastic argument that gets you thinking about everything that could happen, but the delivery is stupid.

    It's like: everyone became one, everyone became a single consciousness, but that one consciousness became dumb. It can't understand sarcasm?! That's it? Like if we were in everyone's skin at once we'd be idiots? PLOT HOLE PLOT HOLE PLOT HOLE - full of holes, nothing makes sense, and when it tries to make sense it's just with some generic cliffhanger that offers nothing, because in the next episode the artistry dissolves. Art isn't supposed to be real life, it's supposed to be more (or less), but never exactly the same.

    It's a boring series, with a boring protagonist, boring pacing, and boring direction. It doesn't deliver, doesn't interest, and doesn't engage. It tries to engage through cliffhangers, but fails miserably, because we don't care about the story anymore (ATM, Episode 5). Just like Breaking Bad - the first season is painful! Maybe in five years it'll become a classic. But for now: BOOOORIIIING

    Imagine if everyone were a single consciousness, and everyone had access to all knowledge... except you remove all the important knowledge, and leave only the stuff from math and biology. Then throw away everything related to linguistics, philosophy, psychoanalysis, arts, dialetics, politics, religions and so on - what's left???

    Vince Gilligan has absolutely no competence to handle a plot of that magnitude.

    But I'm giving it 2 stars because the premise is good, and the first episode is fantastic. Maybe when the season ends I'll just watch a summary (youtube) to see how much the director managed to do with all that money.

    Sad.

    Centres d’intérêt connexes

    Naomie Harris, Mahershala Ali, Janelle Monáe, André Holland, Herman Caheej McGloun, Edson Jean, Alex R. Hibbert, and Tanisha Cidel in Moonlight (2016)
    Drame
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in L'Empire contre-attaque (1980)
    Science-fiction

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Throughout the entire episode, the voice of the person in the messages when Carol is on the phone is unmistakably Patrick Fabian who plays Howard Hamlin in Better Call Saul
    • Connexions
      References Better Call Saul (2015)
    • Bandes originales
      Deo gratias (Thirty-Six-Part Canon)
      Written by Johannes Ockeghem

      Performed by Paul Van Nevel & Huelgas Ensemble

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 26 novembre 2025 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 46min
    • Couleur
      • Color

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.